On the subject of sex and politicians, the French are much more pragmatic than Americans (and I’m no fan of the French in most matters).

The French do not generally comment about the sexuality of their politicians.

Like any cross-section of the populace, and perhaps even more so, there’s a fair number of individuals who engage in multiple sexual partners, same-sex partners, fetishes, and just about every sexual tendency that you can shake a stick at.

Americans can be such effing PRUDES.

Where’s the logic in assuming that our politicians are going to be any less sexual, any less prone to variations from maritial sex in missionary position?

Who GIVES A RAT’S ASS about which senator is porking whom? Or wearing diapers……. Or looking for sex in a men’s room……

Fer cryin’ out loud, your Puritan ancestry is showing! Or at least your Puritan tendencies.

It’s difficult to care what one senator is doing for his or her sexual jollies, at least as much as how readily they are to REAM America’s men and boys, such as when they passed VAWA unanimously.

The sexual pleasures of ladies I do not pay for although I do like them quite a lot.

So I am not quite the material for the Senate. Insufficient moral corruption.

British MPs are noted for their peccadillos, particularly the gentleman members occasionally donning female garb for rumpy pumpy purposes, on and off duty. I doubt I am sufficiently qualified for the MP role either on that score.

But I am eminently qualified for the Presidency on the Durn Furriner ticket and to date, my dear, I have yet to win your vote.

What do I have to do? Do you have anything exotic in mind? I am full of Southern Promise.