<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From WomenPayingSupport.com&#8211;&#8217;Be a Man&#8230;Don&#8217;t Ask for Spousal Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:36:56 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fourthwire</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53627</link>
		<dc:creator>fourthwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53627</guid>
		<description>&quot;Get f*cked, lady.&quot;

Best post that you&#039;ve written lately, Amfortas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Get f*cked, lady.&#8221;</p>
<p>Best post that you&#8217;ve written lately, Amfortas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonysprout</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53609</link>
		<dc:creator>tonysprout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53609</guid>
		<description>KRS said,

How about a new slogan for men&#039;s movement … &quot;Be a Woman. Pay your fair share.&quot;

Not quite. It should be &quot;Be a Woman. Pay your EQUAL share.&quot;

After all, who understands equality better than the AmeriKan fem-nuts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KRS said,</p>
<p>How about a new slogan for men&#8217;s movement … &#8220;Be a Woman. Pay your fair share.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not quite. It should be &#8220;Be a Woman. Pay your EQUAL share.&#8221;</p>
<p>After all, who understands equality better than the AmeriKan fem-nuts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobH</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53586</link>
		<dc:creator>BobH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53586</guid>
		<description>Face it, women, American or otherwise, are just prostitutes trying to be expensive prostitutes.

Actually, that&#039;s not such a bad thing (Prostitution occurs in lots of non-human species), except when women refuse to admit it and overdo their manipulative hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it, women, American or otherwise, are just prostitutes trying to be expensive prostitutes.</p>
<p>Actually, that&#8217;s not such a bad thing (Prostitution occurs in lots of non-human species), except when women refuse to admit it and overdo their manipulative hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRS</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53582</link>
		<dc:creator>KRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53582</guid>
		<description>How about a new slogan for men&#039;s movement ... &quot;Be a Woman.  Pay your fair share.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a new slogan for men&#8217;s movement &#8230; &#8220;Be a Woman.  Pay your fair share.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheManOnTheStreet</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53578</link>
		<dc:creator>TheManOnTheStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53578</guid>
		<description>Bu...but... the money is not for HIMmmmmmmm!  It&#039;s for the children!  Honest!

TMOTS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bu&#8230;but&#8230; the money is not for HIMmmmmmmm!  It&#8217;s for the children!  Honest!</p>
<p>TMOTS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti armchair generals</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53568</link>
		<dc:creator>anti armchair generals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53568</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court rules in Frontiero v. Richarson that both genders are entitled to same amount of support.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0411_0677_ZO.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court rules in Frontiero v. Richarson that both genders are entitled to same amount of support.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0411_0677_ZO.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0411_0677_ZO.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amfortas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53564</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53564</guid>
		<description>&quot;Be a man&quot;! 

What man is that? The &quot;all men are rapists&quot; man? The sucker? The Jerk? The Creep? The Useless Dork?  the &quot;Men !! &quot;(tm) ?

Get f*cked, lady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Be a man&#8221;! </p>
<p>What man is that? The &#8220;all men are rapists&#8221; man? The sucker? The Jerk? The Creep? The Useless Dork?  the &#8220;Men !! &#8220;(tm) ?</p>
<p>Get f*cked, lady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackal1994</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53555</link>
		<dc:creator>jackal1994</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53555</guid>
		<description>Notice how the need to disparage him is immediate and complete: he just smoked pot and complained he was sick.

HOWEVER(!), when the women is the beneficiary her status as a GOOD person DOESN&#039;T MATTER!

In fact, wasn&#039;t there just an article a few weeks back about a man who wanted to stop paying alimony to his ex because she was guilty of manslaughter in the slaying of their son?

Funny that she&#039;s entitled to alimony, but if any men happened to be lucky enough to get off the hamster wheel for a short while and enjoy being his kids primary care-giver he&#039;s supposed to &quot;man-up&quot; and not ask for support.

Nowadays when I&#039;m being told to &#039;man-up&#039; in some or other article (in my mind) it more accurately means &#039;chump-up.&#039;

Pay for dates? Chump-up. Work overtime to pay lavish &quot;the good life&quot; on a woman? Chump-up. Work long hours (or commute) so you&#039;re wife (and mother of your children) doesn&#039;t have to work? Chump-up.

All of these things can and will be used against you in a court of law turning you into a virtual slave. LET NO GOOD DEAD GO UNPUNISHED!

Chivalry IS dead and feminist leaders are holding the smoking gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how the need to disparage him is immediate and complete: he just smoked pot and complained he was sick.</p>
<p>HOWEVER(!), when the women is the beneficiary her status as a GOOD person DOESN&#8217;T MATTER!</p>
<p>In fact, wasn&#8217;t there just an article a few weeks back about a man who wanted to stop paying alimony to his ex because she was guilty of manslaughter in the slaying of their son?</p>
<p>Funny that she&#8217;s entitled to alimony, but if any men happened to be lucky enough to get off the hamster wheel for a short while and enjoy being his kids primary care-giver he&#8217;s supposed to &#8220;man-up&#8221; and not ask for support.</p>
<p>Nowadays when I&#8217;m being told to &#8216;man-up&#8217; in some or other article (in my mind) it more accurately means &#8216;chump-up.&#8217;</p>
<p>Pay for dates? Chump-up. Work overtime to pay lavish &#8220;the good life&#8221; on a woman? Chump-up. Work long hours (or commute) so you&#8217;re wife (and mother of your children) doesn&#8217;t have to work? Chump-up.</p>
<p>All of these things can and will be used against you in a court of law turning you into a virtual slave. LET NO GOOD DEAD GO UNPUNISHED!</p>
<p>Chivalry IS dead and feminist leaders are holding the smoking gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotNOW</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53552</link>
		<dc:creator>NotNOW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53552</guid>
		<description>&quot;The surest way to mandate better treatment for men requires that women be treated legally as their equals.&quot;

I couldn&#039;t agree more.  It is in fact men who are challenging women&#039;s privilege, not the other way around.  Women HATE equal treatment.


&quot;I kinda hope it&#039;s a guy doing this. I like the idea of cry-baby women putting money into the pocket of some smart guy for a change.&quot;

What an awesome idea.....collect a crapload of free money, then tell &#039;em all you&#039;re really a guy.  Absolutely delicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The surest way to mandate better treatment for men requires that women be treated legally as their equals.&#8221;</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  It is in fact men who are challenging women&#8217;s privilege, not the other way around.  Women HATE equal treatment.</p>
<p>&#8220;I kinda hope it&#8217;s a guy doing this. I like the idea of cry-baby women putting money into the pocket of some smart guy for a change.&#8221;</p>
<p>What an awesome idea&#8230;..collect a crapload of free money, then tell &#8216;em all you&#8217;re really a guy.  Absolutely delicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dittohd</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53546</link>
		<dc:creator>Dittohd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53546</guid>
		<description>Notice the creator of this WomenPayingSupport.com website is charging $20 for each cry-baby woman paying child support to whine on the site about supporting their children.

Ha! ha!  This woman (if it&#039;s a woman) is smart.  She&#039;s trying to get her child support paid off the backs of her fellow cry-baby women.  I hope the guy she&#039;s paying the support to finds out about all the extra money she&#039;s making and takes her back to court to get the support upgraded.

I kinda hope it&#039;s a guy doing this.  I like the idea of cry-baby women putting money into the pocket of some smart guy for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice the creator of this WomenPayingSupport.com website is charging $20 for each cry-baby woman paying child support to whine on the site about supporting their children.</p>
<p>Ha! ha!  This woman (if it&#8217;s a woman) is smart.  She&#8217;s trying to get her child support paid off the backs of her fellow cry-baby women.  I hope the guy she&#8217;s paying the support to finds out about all the extra money she&#8217;s making and takes her back to court to get the support upgraded.</p>
<p>I kinda hope it&#8217;s a guy doing this.  I like the idea of cry-baby women putting money into the pocket of some smart guy for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big shooter</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53543</link>
		<dc:creator>Big shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53543</guid>
		<description>Gues it&#039;s womens turn to &quot;be a man&quot; and shut up &amp; pay up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gues it&#8217;s womens turn to &#8220;be a man&#8221; and shut up &amp; pay up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Knight</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53535</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53535</guid>
		<description>It is a crime of peonage either way.

Tom Leykis may be right.  If a mother was ordered to work at least 30 hours each week or make three job contacts to pay child support, she can challenge this as declared null and void by the Antipeonage Act and get a somewhat more sympathetic hearing.

The system, however, is reluctant to burn the mothers as much as it burns the fathers.

Because if they did, the Child Support Crusade not only would not be so popular, but its constitutional flaws and its violation of the anti-slavery laws would not be so invisible to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a crime of peonage either way.</p>
<p>Tom Leykis may be right.  If a mother was ordered to work at least 30 hours each week or make three job contacts to pay child support, she can challenge this as declared null and void by the Antipeonage Act and get a somewhat more sympathetic hearing.</p>
<p>The system, however, is reluctant to burn the mothers as much as it burns the fathers.</p>
<p>Because if they did, the Child Support Crusade not only would not be so popular, but its constitutional flaws and its violation of the anti-slavery laws would not be so invisible to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolishKnight</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53533</link>
		<dc:creator>PolishKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53533</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Career women sacrifices&lt;/b&gt;

This warrants it&#039;s own seperate comment.

Gentlemen, wouldn&#039;t it be hilarious if millions of career women, who already have a reputation for being miserable about a lack of upper income men to date and marry up to, were to openly tell these men that in addition to him busting his hump to compete with her in the workplace that he should also sign off on being liable for her &quot;career sacrifice&quot; to quit her hobby job when it suits her?

Don&#039;t laugh!  Get this!!!  I actually KNOW young men who have been in this position.  They told me that they dated a hot looking but slightly older woman (in her late 20&#039;s early 30&#039;s) and they were desperate to have children and quit their jobs and get married ASAP and they acted like the man was somehow a beneficiary.

The skid marks these young men left are still in the carpets.  

Glenn, the women are right: &quot;Being a man&quot; means accepting responsibility for one&#039;s life choices and to be happy if someone paid the bills for them.  Or more accurately, that&#039;s what being an ADULT should mean.  Unfortunately, &quot;women&quot; and &quot;helpless entitled spoiled adolescent&quot; are synonymous terms in our culture.  

If a man wants a good housewife whom do you think he will pick?  The entitled and bitter former career woman with a divorce lawyer on speed dial OR a young woman who maybe had that in mind all along?  Someone who maybe worked at decent, but not high paying jobs she won&#039;t miss (medical receptionist, dental assistance, secretary, etc.) and built up a repetoire of personal skills in her spare time (music, art, cooking, conversation, etc.) and spends time on her appearance?

I went out with career women and they were AWFUL.  Lessee: They sat around on the other side of the table because they, like many men, outside of the workplace they don&#039;t have much to do or talk about.  They didn&#039;t keep a very clean house.  They didn&#039;t have any hobbies or if they did, they used them against me (_I_ know about world history.  You don&#039;t?  You don&#039;t deserve me then!)  They had the table manners and grace of Donald Trump.

Why, oh why, would ANY man want to have these women &quot;sacrifice&quot; their career to become a housewife?  I see Queer Eye for the Straight Guy and these kinds of women are slovenly housekeepers and then the men get nagged by the queers for not being more helpful around the home.  Well, _he has a job!!!_  What&#039;s her excuse?

It would seem that alimony is just another straw on the camel&#039;s back of pricing these women out of the market.  Way way way overpriced.  Like a 2 bedroom condo in the Bay Area...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Career women sacrifices</b></p>
<p>This warrants it&#8217;s own seperate comment.</p>
<p>Gentlemen, wouldn&#8217;t it be hilarious if millions of career women, who already have a reputation for being miserable about a lack of upper income men to date and marry up to, were to openly tell these men that in addition to him busting his hump to compete with her in the workplace that he should also sign off on being liable for her &#8220;career sacrifice&#8221; to quit her hobby job when it suits her?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t laugh!  Get this!!!  I actually KNOW young men who have been in this position.  They told me that they dated a hot looking but slightly older woman (in her late 20&#8217;s early 30&#8217;s) and they were desperate to have children and quit their jobs and get married ASAP and they acted like the man was somehow a beneficiary.</p>
<p>The skid marks these young men left are still in the carpets.  </p>
<p>Glenn, the women are right: &#8220;Being a man&#8221; means accepting responsibility for one&#8217;s life choices and to be happy if someone paid the bills for them.  Or more accurately, that&#8217;s what being an ADULT should mean.  Unfortunately, &#8220;women&#8221; and &#8220;helpless entitled spoiled adolescent&#8221; are synonymous terms in our culture.  </p>
<p>If a man wants a good housewife whom do you think he will pick?  The entitled and bitter former career woman with a divorce lawyer on speed dial OR a young woman who maybe had that in mind all along?  Someone who maybe worked at decent, but not high paying jobs she won&#8217;t miss (medical receptionist, dental assistance, secretary, etc.) and built up a repetoire of personal skills in her spare time (music, art, cooking, conversation, etc.) and spends time on her appearance?</p>
<p>I went out with career women and they were AWFUL.  Lessee: They sat around on the other side of the table because they, like many men, outside of the workplace they don&#8217;t have much to do or talk about.  They didn&#8217;t keep a very clean house.  They didn&#8217;t have any hobbies or if they did, they used them against me (_I_ know about world history.  You don&#8217;t?  You don&#8217;t deserve me then!)  They had the table manners and grace of Donald Trump.</p>
<p>Why, oh why, would ANY man want to have these women &#8220;sacrifice&#8221; their career to become a housewife?  I see Queer Eye for the Straight Guy and these kinds of women are slovenly housekeepers and then the men get nagged by the queers for not being more helpful around the home.  Well, _he has a job!!!_  What&#8217;s her excuse?</p>
<p>It would seem that alimony is just another straw on the camel&#8217;s back of pricing these women out of the market.  Way way way overpriced.  Like a 2 bedroom condo in the Bay Area&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolishKnight</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53532</link>
		<dc:creator>PolishKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53532</guid>
		<description>Glenn wrote:
&lt;i&gt;Unlike many in the men&#039;s and fathers&#039; movement, I believe that alimony does have a place. I believe alimony is warranted when one partner--male or female--really has put aside or cut back his or her career to be the primary caregiver for his or her children, and is economically disadvantaged because of it.&lt;/i&gt;

I like his article and respect his views, but I think it&#039;s up to him to support, even in a form of a one paragraph summary, his beliefs especially when stating a contrarian view.

I shall support mine: The notion of someone being &quot;disadvantaged&quot; due to their own 100% personal choices and expecting someone else to foot the bill is something only women can get away with in our culture.  These women aren&#039;t martyrs: They are enjoying someone else footing the bill which is what few of them are willing to do for men.  Women with this world-owes-me-a-living attitude are now often finding that there aren&#039;t men lining up with open wallets ready to support their &quot;sacrifice.&quot;  The men NOW OFTEN say quite simply that if she loves her career so much, she can keep it.  And then the rationalizations start:

&quot;I&#039;m making this sacrifice FOR THE CHILDREN!!!&quot;  

Does this mean, then, that these women must automatically view women who DON&#039;T make this noble, heroic sacrifice as not loving their children?  I&#039;ve seen these mommy wars take place and the feminists take a page out of The Life of Brian: &quot;Let&#039;s not forget sisters who the real enemy is... men!&quot;

So it&#039;s a necessary sacrifice FOR THE CHILDREN unless... the woman decides to just dump them into cheap day care or pay an MS-13 gang member below market wages as a nanny.

Balderdash!

Here&#039;s how it should work: If a woman wants a man to support her, she should treat him with the utmost respect and consideration both before, during, and after courtship and the marriage.  Having someone else pay the bills is a HUGE luxury, not an ENTITLEMENT.  Glenn likes to sell himself short.  I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn wrote:<br />
<i>Unlike many in the men&#8217;s and fathers&#8217; movement, I believe that alimony does have a place. I believe alimony is warranted when one partner&#8211;male or female&#8211;really has put aside or cut back his or her career to be the primary caregiver for his or her children, and is economically disadvantaged because of it.</i></p>
<p>I like his article and respect his views, but I think it&#8217;s up to him to support, even in a form of a one paragraph summary, his beliefs especially when stating a contrarian view.</p>
<p>I shall support mine: The notion of someone being &#8220;disadvantaged&#8221; due to their own 100% personal choices and expecting someone else to foot the bill is something only women can get away with in our culture.  These women aren&#8217;t martyrs: They are enjoying someone else footing the bill which is what few of them are willing to do for men.  Women with this world-owes-me-a-living attitude are now often finding that there aren&#8217;t men lining up with open wallets ready to support their &#8220;sacrifice.&#8221;  The men NOW OFTEN say quite simply that if she loves her career so much, she can keep it.  And then the rationalizations start:</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m making this sacrifice FOR THE CHILDREN!!!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Does this mean, then, that these women must automatically view women who DON&#8217;T make this noble, heroic sacrifice as not loving their children?  I&#8217;ve seen these mommy wars take place and the feminists take a page out of The Life of Brian: &#8220;Let&#8217;s not forget sisters who the real enemy is&#8230; men!&#8221;</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s a necessary sacrifice FOR THE CHILDREN unless&#8230; the woman decides to just dump them into cheap day care or pay an MS-13 gang member below market wages as a nanny.</p>
<p>Balderdash!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it should work: If a woman wants a man to support her, she should treat him with the utmost respect and consideration both before, during, and after courtship and the marriage.  Having someone else pay the bills is a HUGE luxury, not an ENTITLEMENT.  Glenn likes to sell himself short.  I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53526</guid>
		<description>Waaaaaaa, what a bum!

Yawn. 

Guess the dark sid of the moon ain&#039;t paved with gold after all. Well, here&#039;s the prize: &quot;You Won!&quot;. Ain&#039;t gonna have to depend on no man no more no more! Hit the road Jack and don&#039;t ya come back no more no more. No siree! You go grrrrrl. You free now, you a strong in-de-pend-ant w-o-o-o-o-m-a-n!

Oh, one more thing, &quot;check&#039;s in the mail Jack&quot;

Man, what a hoot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waaaaaaa, what a bum!</p>
<p>Yawn. </p>
<p>Guess the dark sid of the moon ain&#8217;t paved with gold after all. Well, here&#8217;s the prize: &#8220;You Won!&#8221;. Ain&#8217;t gonna have to depend on no man no more no more! Hit the road Jack and don&#8217;t ya come back no more no more. No siree! You go grrrrrl. You free now, you a strong in-de-pend-ant w-o-o-o-o-m-a-n!</p>
<p>Oh, one more thing, &#8220;check&#8217;s in the mail Jack&#8221;</p>
<p>Man, what a hoot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourthwire</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53525</link>
		<dc:creator>fourthwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53525</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;The only way to abolish alimony is to make women pay it.&quot;--Tom Leykis, nationally-syndicated talk show host.&quot;

And as he so often is, Tom is spot-on with respect to this particular issue.

Pain and suffering only seem to count in our society when a person with a vagina is the one feeling the pain.

The surest way to mandate better treatment for men requires that women be treated legally as their equals.   

Like rastus, it&#039;s difficult to feel ANY sympathy for women who don&#039;t enjoy paying hundreds or thousands of dollars monthly to men, even men who may have cheated on them..........

You&#039;ve come a long way, baby.  Enjoy the fruits of your battle for &quot;equality&quot;.

And for those sorry bitches who stated on womenpayingsupport.com that a guy should &quot;be a man&quot; and refuse to ask for alimony - TOO EFFING BAD!   

YOU MADE YOUR BED!  NOW SLEEP IN IT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;The only way to abolish alimony is to make women pay it.&#8221;&#8211;Tom Leykis, nationally-syndicated talk show host.&#8221;</p>
<p>And as he so often is, Tom is spot-on with respect to this particular issue.</p>
<p>Pain and suffering only seem to count in our society when a person with a vagina is the one feeling the pain.</p>
<p>The surest way to mandate better treatment for men requires that women be treated legally as their equals.   </p>
<p>Like rastus, it&#8217;s difficult to feel ANY sympathy for women who don&#8217;t enjoy paying hundreds or thousands of dollars monthly to men, even men who may have cheated on them&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve come a long way, baby.  Enjoy the fruits of your battle for &#8220;equality&#8221;.</p>
<p>And for those sorry bitches who stated on womenpayingsupport.com that a guy should &#8220;be a man&#8221; and refuse to ask for alimony &#8211; TOO EFFING BAD!   </p>
<p>YOU MADE YOUR BED!  NOW SLEEP IN IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rastus</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/23/from-womenpayingsupportcom-be-a-mandont-ask-for-spousal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-53524</link>
		<dc:creator>rastus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-53524</guid>
		<description>That slow, dripping sound you hear is my heart bleeding for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That slow, dripping sound you hear is my heart bleeding for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
