After being sent to prison for 18 years of his life for an act of rape for which he was innocent, partially on the testimony of a 12-year-old girl…………..

……… now he faces having to share his poverty-level income of $20,000 per year for those miserable years in prison with yet one more greedy, self-centered American bitch!

Here’s a man who stands to be raped at least twice in his life, once for a sexual assault that he never committed, and once again for back child support for those years during which he was wrongfully imprisoned, to benefit a greedy scumbag with a vagina (the key to extracting money from men through the power of the state).

And who knows how many times Dail suffered from sexual assaults himself, while imprisoned……….

You had better believe that the feminazis running Womyn’s Studies programs to indoctrinate young people with their propaganda and who tell their lurid “horror stories” about men to legislators to help press through more misandry-laden bills like VAWA and IMBRA will never mention Dail’s case aloud.

Glenn Sacks, for all of his imperfections, does Mensnewsdaily readers a major favor for simply bringing cases such as this particular monumental travesty of justice to our attention.

How many men are rotting in prisons for rapes that they never committed?

And how much longer must men fear of being convicted for rapes that they did not commit…….. based on such a low level of credibility as a 12-year-old child’s testimony and hair similar to that found at the scene of the crime?

A woman is denied a restraining order, her ex-husband kills her and the responsible judge is not only out of a job, he’s the target of a legal inquiry into his conduct.

Yet a man is sent to prison for 18 years of his life for a rape that he did not commit, and there are no legal consequences for those responsible for sending him to prison.

We threw out the British government for far, far lesser abuses than that.

Kudos Christian!

Indeed, what kind of monster serves up a lawsuit to a man who just got out of prison where he’s been unjustly for 18 years looking to grab the little bit of money he has to get on with his life?

Sadly, this woman is not the exception but rather the norm in our culture. As KRS says, we don’t even have any confidence in “liars’ court” for basic administration of the law much less justice and fairness.

(I’m going somewhere with this) In addition, as I love to point out to the discomforture of feminist apologists, women now have the right to abandon their children because so many children have been killed. So society now has absolutely NO standards of women to act decently.

I’m reminded of a funny story about someone I knew in my hometown who was a brazen risk taker. He got some kind of adrenalin rush off of it. He decided to go on a shoplifting spree and went into the store and grabbed everything he could off of the shelves and stuff it into his jacket. He walks about with a big pot belly to the car and dumps it into the back seat.

Then he said: “Oh, damn! I forgot to get batteries!” and went back in again for another run.

He got nailed (well, almost) but the point of the story is that such brazen personalities don’t know their limits. I think they might have some kind of gray line and are experts at establishing it but as they get away with more and more, they lose control. Police say that’s how they catch these guys.

I wonder if feminism and this mad anti-male chivalry is going the same route. As women become more and more awful, what happens when enough men wake up? How will the Denises and Sommers convince them to just tweak a few things? There’s no “mend it, not end it” solution here. We need serious, radical reformation of these systems.

So in theory, her claim on his money should be dismissed based on how the law reads. He still doesn’t have any income from those 18 years.

In reality, this is case will be decided in family court, where laws are routinely ignored so as to give women as much power and money as possible, and where child support amounts are inflated so that the state gets its matching federal funds as per the Social Security Act.

My prediction: she will win, despite the law being on his side.