You mean enlisting the aid of tyrants to steal his property and to impose crushing monthly support obligations greater than his income is not doing anything wrong?

Violating Darren’s constitutional rights is not doing anything wrong?

Trying to impose peonage, a federal felony, 18 U.S.C. §1581, is not doing anything wrong?

Glenn, you can be as exasperating as Arnold running for Governor of California as a conservative Republican and then turning into a liberal girly man who drank the global warming Kool-Aid once in office. If Governor Arnold lifted a finger to restore the family courts to constitutional practice, it is a secret to me!

It is very hard to agree with the above statement. In the case of Winkler, it is pretty clear that Matthew did nothing wrong. But in the case of Mack, Charla filed for a divorce and tried to get Darren’s hard earned money for herself ….money which she did not work for and which she did not deserve one bit. Basically, she tried to indulge in court and government sponsored extortion and robbery. And it is not unreasonable to snap under such circumstances and try to murder the extortionist/robber in order to stop the extortion/robbery.

‘Darren Mack (pictured), a wealthy Nevada father who was involved in a divorce’ – Darren Mach became wealthy through his hard work and effort and smartness, but the divorce was making him bankrupt and making him lose all that he had worked for over many years. Had he not killed his wife, he would have become a bankrupt Nevada father.

That just about sums it up, even without the falling over oneself to condemn Mack. The fact that it only works for women – that it works at all – is the major reason why so many are completely angered by the Courts, the divorce system and the abuse claim abuse. Who needs to be considered a lunatic? Who in their right mind can retain any confidence in the Law and the Justice system?

Just as women in legions seem to think they have a ‘right’ to murder their husbands or dispossess them or rip their children from them and poison their minds with impunity, indeed with support from so many sections of society – not just femonazis – so there are going to be a legion of men who determine to take action on the situations they find themselves in. Men are just more patient about it so far. More hopeful. More trusting in the system. They are increasingly disabused of all three.

When the replacement for the Law of the Jungle gets overgrown with corruption weeds and populated by rapacious animals in suits, why are we suprised that the jungle looks a better option again?

Yes, let us all condemn Darren Mack. He killed, and tried to kill. He was seeking, as far as we can tell, Justice, self protection, redress. He wasn’t going to find them, was he? Society says, “No, no. That’s bad”. While we are at it, why not condemn all those who have killed with the blessing of society. In fact why not just say bugger society.

The Courts and our divorce system have.

Is this what we want? A return to the jungle? Each man persuing his own Justice in his own way? Of course not. But that is what will happen so long as the corrupt, family destroying, men condemning, corrupt , extortion racketeers – quietly applauded by the vast majority of women urging, “Let’s you and him fight” – continue to let Truth, Honour, Justice and the Integrity of individuals to be sacrificed on the alter of greed and hatred.

The old America was built on men taking up their guns to counter the wickedness that others visited upon them. I guess they were mad, bad folk too. Odd, isn’t it. We called them pioneers and admired them.