Warner Todd Huston
Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic

Variety is reporting that conservative radio talker Laura Ingraham has been signed by Fox News Channel as a floating replacement host to fill in when the regular hosts of “The O’Reilly Factor” and “Hannity & Colmes” are not available. She is also pegged to appear on other programs not revealed.

In a press release, Ingraham said, “After years of guest appearances on FOX, I couldn’t be happier about the opportunity to add my voice to FNC’s stellar lineup.”

This is quite good news for both Ingraham and Fox. For that matter, it is good news for the viewer as well as conservatives because Ingraham is an articulate conservative that can easily go head-to-head against the best (or worst as the case may be) that the left has to offer. I look forward to seeing Ingraham taking on the left on Fox News in the near future. She also has been known not to let folks on her own side get off easily when they have disappointed her conservative principles, so she is not going to be just another yes man… or yes woman… for the right.

I wish Laura luck and look forward to seeing more of her.

So what, you may ask, did I mean by my headline about pugnacity not being telegenic?

Because, Ingraham is taking the place of the apparently departed Michelle Malkin and therein lies the tale.

Now, before you go imagining that I am attacking Michelle, let me disabuse you of that notion. Michelle is an incredibly beautiful, smart woman and is one of the few thus far who have been able to translate her presence on the Internet to wider exposure than the WWW. She has appeared on TV, published a book, and gotten columns in the MSM. She has been quite successful thus far and has deserved that success.

She is tireless in propounding conservative principles, quick witted, confident and forceful. But, she has one tiny little aspect that does not come across well and that is her pugnacity. And that pugnacity has made her a lightning rod for controversy. Now, don’t get me wrong, controversy isn’t necessarily bad, but what we have with Michelle is a bit of a wild streak and that wild streak reveals itself at times in injudicious language. She can be likened to Ann Coulter in style and that is the style of a polemicist…. that’s a crap stirrer for those of you in Rio Linda.

The upshot is, Malkin’s pugnacity tends to cause her to feud with people far too easily to be considered a “serious” commentator. By the quote marks around serious, I mean that her occasionally injudicious language and pugnacious personality detracts from her being taken seriously by those not already on her side. In short, she can too easily be portrayed as a ranter.

And this, I’ll wager, is the reason Fox now favors Ingraham over Malkin as fill in host. In fact, I’d also wager that this is about the end of Michelle’s rise upward on Fox and will represent the first step back down the rungs of the ladder sending her back to “just” a blogger. It is quite possible that Malkin may start to find her Fox appearances beginning to dry up.

I am not predicting Michelle’s demise, really, as I am sure she will continue to do well in the blogosphere. But, I feel her TV days could be appearing in her rearview mirror.

Now, with this tale comes a lesson. If you want to be considered a serious commentator, the Ann Coulter/Michelle Malkin school of pugnacity should be avoided. Again, let me be crystal clear. I am NOT saying that we should let our enemies define us by claiming that a sharp retort makes our positions untenable. I am saying that if we want to be considered serious commentators we need to keep the volatile language to a bare minimum and not make it a central part of our style.

It’s not just a way to appease those against our point of view, it’s just the civil and serious thing to do. Yes, there is a time and a place for the sharp retort, the occasional name-calling, but making it a common part of your argument diminishes the argument and your reputation, both.

So, hooray for Laura and a warning for Michelle is the end result of this Fox News Channel decision. I wish them both luck and good fortune.

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 1 views | Other posts by Warner Todd Huston

Stumble It!

book mark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic in del.icio.us | Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic to Slashdot.com | Submit Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic to Digg.com | Submit Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic in Furl | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic in Spurl | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic in Reddit | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic in Tailrank | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic in Newsvine | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic to Yahoo! | Bookmark Lesson: Pugnacity is Not Telegenic to Fark

2 Comments »

  1. barkingdog said,

    I agree with the “Hooray for Laura” part, and I think she will do well on the little screen. But I think (hope) you are wrong about Michelle, and I would not put her in the same category as Anne Coulter. The problem with Anne is that the libs cannot tell when she is pulling their chain, and they take everything she says literally. By doing that, they get ammunition from Coulter, which they use to paint all conservatives as raving lunatics. Michelle is a different story. Yes, she is “spunky” and does not allow liberal b.s. to go unchallenged. But she does not do it in an offensive manner. When you listen to the absolute garbage coming out of Alan Colmes’ mouth (every Colmes question starts with “Don’t you agree that….”) it amazes me that Michelle can stay on the rational, fact-based track as well as she does. Maybe she could tone it down once in a while, but she is not a firebrand like Anne Coulter.

    I could be wrong and you could be right, but I hope not. I hope there is room on Fox for both Michelle and Laura — and they can get rid of Geraldo!

    October 30, 2007 at 9:30 am

  2. Squiggy said,

    Ann Coulter may be a lightning rod, but she’s a good one. Now that her sixth book is racing toward number one, I doubt whether she cares what she’s called. She’s writing her own ticket, and it’s a very well-paying ticket.

    And even though the left keeps calling her a lunatic (couldn’t care less about that, like it even) they can’t argue with her because she’s right about them (they’re insane, and they hate God). They can only argue with her style. In other words, she wins the argument.

    With James Carville, and the other screaming loonies on their side, why should we give an inch on this? We should keep hammering on them like they do us, but the current crop of repubs are spineless, so it won’t happen. In a civilized world being civilized will get you points, but not in this Reid/Pelosi world. Only screaming louder will get you heard.

    October 31, 2007 at 3:45 am

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MND Opinion
Glenn Sacks on men and the world they inhabit Dr. Helen Smith on psychology, family, sex, and metropolis Bernard Chapin: political commentary, men and women Marc H. Rudov on men and women Marty Nemko: men's issues social critic, radio host, columnist Professor Stephen Baskerville on fatherhood and family in America David R. Usher on the gender wars Warner Todd Huston on politics and current events Denise Noe on women, crime, history, and society Carey Roberts on political correctness Jim Kouri: Crime and Security Zvakwana: on Africa and Zimbabwe Dr. Robert Wascher on health and medicine Blogwonks Humorist Doug Powers on society Roger F. Gay on politics and technology, robotics
editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter
RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
counter