<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stephen Limbaugh: Missouri’s Most Dangerous Liberal Judge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:02:46 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David R. Usher</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-77283</link>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/#comment-77283</guid>
		<description>anything moving the standard of proof and/or the standard of review closer to something trustworthy is a step in the right direction.  If the SupCt looks more carefully next time, they might just discover that the trying of these things by tribunals in a county several hours from the jurisdiction of the person being tried is also a violation of rules.  People must be tried in their jurisdiction, not at some remote place where, by trial by telephone, one cannot introduce evidence or effectively examine it, cross-examine witnesses, or read the facial expressions of those testifying.

There is much more that is unconstitutional about Missouri&#039;s handling of the child support process that would take a lengthy article to cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anything moving the standard of proof and/or the standard of review closer to something trustworthy is a step in the right direction.  If the SupCt looks more carefully next time, they might just discover that the trying of these things by tribunals in a county several hours from the jurisdiction of the person being tried is also a violation of rules.  People must be tried in their jurisdiction, not at some remote place where, by trial by telephone, one cannot introduce evidence or effectively examine it, cross-examine witnesses, or read the facial expressions of those testifying.</p>
<p>There is much more that is unconstitutional about Missouri&#8217;s handling of the child support process that would take a lengthy article to cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2parent</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-77282</link>
		<dc:creator>right2parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/#comment-77282</guid>
		<description>David, I hope you were paying as much attention to what the court did say.  The issue was the standard of review required before the court could proceed.  Sound familiar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I hope you were paying as much attention to what the court did say.  The issue was the standard of review required before the court could proceed.  Sound familiar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Selberg</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-77280</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Selberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/#comment-77280</guid>
		<description>Great article Ush:

Your comment&#039;s last sentence is ultimate truth.

Likely Justice Limbaugh was not impressed with my reminding the court of legal scholar,  Edmund Morgan’s infamous quote:  “There is no proposition so absurd but that some judge, sitting on some bench, has at some time solemnly proclaimed it to be the law.”

It brought a smile to the Mo Western District judges on oral argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Ush:</p>
<p>Your comment&#8217;s last sentence is ultimate truth.</p>
<p>Likely Justice Limbaugh was not impressed with my reminding the court of legal scholar,  Edmund Morgan’s infamous quote:  “There is no proposition so absurd but that some judge, sitting on some bench, has at some time solemnly proclaimed it to be the law.”</p>
<p>It brought a smile to the Mo Western District judges on oral argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R. Usher</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-77278</link>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/#comment-77278</guid>
		<description>It is better to write publicly.  When you send things to a judge personally, he is likely to take it personally.  Writing such letters is useless.  It is far better to spank these people publicly.  Courts know they have overstepped their boundaries when the respect for the courts goes south.  The court&#039;s deepest fear is that the public will not respect the law.  There is no faster way to impress this in the minds of citizens that for the courts to openly disrespect the law itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is better to write publicly.  When you send things to a judge personally, he is likely to take it personally.  Writing such letters is useless.  It is far better to spank these people publicly.  Courts know they have overstepped their boundaries when the respect for the courts goes south.  The court&#8217;s deepest fear is that the public will not respect the law.  There is no faster way to impress this in the minds of citizens that for the courts to openly disrespect the law itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MensIssuesObserver</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-77279</link>
		<dc:creator>MensIssuesObserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/#comment-77279</guid>
		<description>It is substantially easier for a woman to appeal a $25 parking ticket than for a man who was fraudulently convicted in secret of being a deadbeat dad and saddled with paying $350,000 over 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is substantially easier for a woman to appeal a $25 parking ticket than for a man who was fraudulently convicted in secret of being a deadbeat dad and saddled with paying $350,000 over 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonysprout</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-77281</link>
		<dc:creator>tonysprout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/10/31/stephen-limbaugh-missouri%e2%80%99s-most-dangerous-liberal-judge/#comment-77281</guid>
		<description>Is it legal to write a judge and tell them (politely) how disgusting their legal opinions are?

I wrote a judge in VA once (not politely) and had a visit from the local constables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it legal to write a judge and tell them (politely) how disgusting their legal opinions are?</p>
<p>I wrote a judge in VA once (not politely) and had a visit from the local constables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
