Typical.

Abortion is legal; women are no longer housewives; women graduate at greater rates; the government incents women business ventures with low cost loans; divorce is easy (unilateral and no-fault), and mom’s are rewarded by the government after divorce with kids, 18 years of tax free income, and property; women live about 10% longer on average than men; more money is spend on women’s health care; they have women’s right groups and men do not; men are blamed for the things that go wrong in family, business, and religion; women demand and mostly still get chivalry; men still get stuck doing jobs they can get hurt on or die; a man is imprisoned for failure to pay cild support while a women has never been imprisoned for the same; that America has only 5% of the world’s population, yet America is home to 25% of the world’s inmate population – 95% of American prisoners are men; churches are feminized (for example,mothers day women are honored, father’s day men are challenged to serve their wives); the media worships woman and goofs on men; academics care little attract men and or retain men; elementary and high school teachers are women’s clubs;

Yeah, things are not equal between men and women.

You may think that being a feminist means you support equal rights between the sexes, but that is not what Denis describes. For us “feminist” means “feminazi”.

MaireadL, I like to believe that you are not a feminazi. I would feel better, however, if you did not behave like the “good Germans” who were in denial of what had been happening to the Jews.

If you conclude that what Denis describes should be stopped, we welcome you.

Just remember, you need not be in denial to assert that you are not a man-hater. Being in denial makes us men wonder and gets on our nerves. When all you have to do is strip away the denial, and clearly state that you oppose this crap.

That’s all we ask.

2.) Women take sole custody of the children more than 70% of the time.

3.) Family Courts routinely ignore the visitation rights of fathers.

4.) Women use the nuclear option of “domestic violence” to gain sole custody of children and ownership of assets as this tactic is now routinely recommended by Family Law lawyers even though it has been shown that domestic violence is committed by women about as frequently as domestic violence committed by men, and most reported cases of DV in divorce proceedings are untrue but never questioned in court.

5.) Women via preferential affirmative action laws have for decades been hired and promoted over men simply because they have a vagina.

6.) Women have been handed the dominate position of greater rights and greater economic position and opportunity in the world of work (formerly the male dominated sphere) due to affirmative action laws going back decades while the female dominated sphere, the family, continues to be owned solely by females. See 1.), 2.), 3.), & 4.).

7.) Whereas throughout history, however diificult life was for women, it has always been more difficult for men. Men used to have concurrent rights with responsibilities while women always had privileges and favored status. Men no longer have concurrent rights. They are fourth class citizens behind women, children, and pets.

8.) Due to the VAWA men can be ejected from their home and separated from their children by the state without any due process rights on the basis only of a phone call by a woman.

9.) Three young men at Duke university almost spent 30+ years of their lives in jail on false charges of rape on the word only of a woman. Their families today have over $1 million in legal fees each. The state, the media, and univerisity officials almost succeeded in their high tech lynching of these innocent men. Almost everyday we read about DNA test exonerating men who were falsely accused of rape and who, in many cases, spend years behind bars.

10.) Women routinely get a slap on the hand for the sexual molestation of minors-a crime that will get a man 20+ years in jail.

11.) The wife of a preacher was recently set free after being found not guilty in the murder of her preacher husband. In this case, the woman shot the man in the back while he was asleep. There was no verifiable proof of any DV against this woman or the children at anytime in their marriage. In fact, the children are on record as saying there was no violence in their home. This same crime by a man would result in a life sentence or the death penalty.

I could go on and on and on. I haven’t even scratched the surface when considering how much I have posted about this the last 6 years. And you are telling the men here about fairness that affects YOU!!!

Perhaps my fellow MRA brothers can continue this list. (It does get tiring at times to have to respond to such female ignorance so often.)

It is so predictable that American women call themselves feminists and harp about fairness when it is not they who get treated unfairly but rather the men who do. What is also predictable is that women will never defend men and never fight against the injustices against men. They will only talk about themselves.

For them, it’s always about them.

Always is.

Always was.

Mature adults realize that every group has some idiots, but that dismissing an entire group of people because you know one idiot is a silly thing to do.

I’m a feminist. I’m very attractive and I have an amazing boyfriend who I love very much. I have lots of men friends and relatives who I adore. I think that men as a whole are awesome people. I do want to be paid the same as men are paid for doing the same job, but that hardly makes me a bitch or a man-hater, it just makes me sensible.

..Ive never met a feminist that was about equality!!

….Most of the feminists I’ve met were about hogging more state/federal femi-pork by promulgateing more and more women-as-victim agit prop on every billboard that could hold another poster!!

..They are feeding like hogs at the trough on state/federal pork…And farmers know when hogs are feeding you have to remove the young hogs because when these girls get feeding, they will in fact feed on everything in their path including their own young!!

This person summed this page up best:

“OMFG! I had no idea! Prior to reading the comments I actually liked men just fine… even dated them! I had no idea I was defying the paradigm of what a feminist could be…. I need to leave work right now, get my Birkenstocks, grab a great big knife (I’m naming her Emasculator), and head out to do some man hating. I haven’t even eaten man in, like, a month. So much to do, so little time. My partner is going to be so sad to find out that I need to become middle-aged, unattractive, and (presumably) a lesbian now, lest I cease to fit into the box the republi-bots decided I fit in. Damn. Damn, I say.

I can’t even really be mad at those men. It’s like getting mad at a cross eyed cat for running into your rose bowl. It’s not their fault their brains don’t function correctly. Seriously, that much hatred has to burn out vital neurological functions.”

That feminist are pro-abortion. The doctor could not perform several abortions on baby in a mother without her consent. This mother attempted to have her child aborted a few times, so this mother is probably a feminist.

I sense by your style of logic and quickness to anger that you too may be a feminist. Welcome to our site.

In the future note that sometimes I post on this site for other pro-equal rights people to only share articles. Sometimes it is relevant some time it is not.

I think that Glen is correct to point out that you don’t want to sink to the level of gradeschool taunts. It accomplishes nothing and only reinforces the worst that people will believe in you. It is not constructive (and not particularly accurate either) to characterize liberal women as ugly. For one thing, why is that important? You may not like Hilary Clinton, and you may find her utterly unattractive, but that has no affect on her ability to govern, nor has it impeded her success. Pleny of unattractive men have become very powerful players in Washington, regardless of their ease on the eyes. It’s a silly argument, and while I’m sure that Glen and I disagree on nearly everything else, he’s right to want no part of it.

Right, so female feminists want to cut off the penises of their lovers and husbands and fathers and cousins and … where are you getting this research from? Oh right, almost forgot…your own deluded imaginings.

Not all feminists are women, by the way. And though I find it completely irrelevant and honestly idiotic to pin so much worth on their looks when men can do nearly everything they want in life even if they were born as ugly as the back of a donkey, many feminist women are attractive.

“What makes American women so unattractive isn’t their looks, which are probably evenly distributed between feminists and non-femininists, but the attitude of hatred and entitlement that make them unbearable.”

Let me get this straight. You think that all American *women* are hateful and prone to entitlement? Entitlement to what? Have you looked scrupulously at the actions of any American men lately? Oh wait… this is a men’s publication. How silly of me.

“They think that all men are stupid, have no idea of how to respect much less
love a man and have vast delusions about what they deserve.”

No, they just don’t love shortsighted idiots who, for example, post such articles of drivel in men’s publications. What you fail to realize is that many feminists find quite decent men and often *gasp* even marry them. But they don’t have to. And why should a woman’s worth be determined by her ability to love a man?

And what, exactly, are these cast delusions about what they deserve? Could you elaborate? What exactly should our fellow human beings be denied?

“The 50 and over American women are riddled with anger and seem to to have nothing that gives them pleasure.”

You feel that you can speak for a whole section of the American population. How impressive.

“This post is slightly exaggerated, I admit, but only slightly.”

Oh my. I can’t contain my grin.

So I leave you with this:

“Feminism is the radical notion that women are human beings.” –Cheris Kramerae

do your research before you spew such mindless hatred.

Thanks.

Elliot B.

So grow a set, Glenn, and stop attempting to be “decent” to a group of bitches who would happily neuter everyone born with a penis!

They don’t respect you, they will hate you anyway, and they are certainly rather uninterested in your opinions about them under all circumstances.

Good looking people can sell most anything, and Rupert Murdoch knows this.

But CNN is catching on. Now, they too have all good-looking liberals to sell their views. We are a nation that goes on physical appearance.

This habit probably started with the first caveman. Even animals evolved for appearances…which explains the peacock…which explains Bill Clinton.

It’s all about the money. Hillary has had plenty of plastic surgery, and she will have more.

Women who were not born with “good Looks” were an easy mark for the feminists, weren’t they? I get the feeling Janet Reno would have done anything for Bill.

Now— you have to be good-looking as well as smart to really stay on top. The culture seems to demand it. And being good looking presents it’s own problems.

AND there has always been a double standard for men…but that is changing as we speak. Tell me Mr. Sachs…does Fox make you wear Makeup?

This subject about “looks” is many faceted.

Having said that, I’ve always gotten the feeling that Madeline Albright THINKS she is just a killer in the looks department. I don’t know why.

Maybe Bill wrote her love notes.