Child Support Enforcement’s Endless Errors (Part I): Agency Demands Man Pay Ex-Wife CS for Child He Has with New Wife

2007-11-23
By

“Bungling cases isn’t anything new at Friend of the Court. In recent years Action News has repeatedly showed you how Friend of the Court has accused honest men of being deadbeat dads even when they had proof they were paying child support or didn’t owe a penny.”

Critics of divorced fathers and so-called “deadbeat dads” are often unaware of the many problems with the way child support is set and enforced. One of these problems is the phenomenal amount of errors Child Support enforcement agencies make. I’ll be running stories about them as part of my series called “Child Support Enforcement’s Endless Errors.”

According to the Detroit TV station WXYZ’s news report Friend of the Court (11/10/06):

“It’s a system designed to protect children from the hardships of divorce, but one family says Wayne County Friend of the Court made life miserable instead.

“The Wayne County Friend of the Court is a place with a history of botching simple cases and turning them into a maddeningly confusing mess.

“No one knows that better than Ruth and Dale Akers, who married 6 years ago and had a baby named Dale IV.

“But then they got a notice from Friend of the Court saying their son wasn’t theirs. Instead, it said, he belonged to Dale’s ex-wife and Dale owed child support.

“Bungling cases isn’t anything new at Friend of the Court. In recent years Action News has repeatedly showed you how Friend of the Court has accused honest men of being deadbeat dads even when they had proof they were paying child support or didn’t owe a penny.

“Terrance Hale said Friend of the Court misspelled his name and had him paying support for a newborn named Marjae to a stranger named Toni Etters.

“‘All they could tell me is this is your kid because the computer says it’s your kid,’ he said. (more…)

Erectile Dysfunction? Hair Loss? Call the Men's Renaissance Health Centers

MRHCs are specialty medical facilities dedicated to helping men. Call (866) 398-6086. Mention Glenn Sacks to receive special rates.

26 views

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    The Child Support Crusade is designed to support the children of government employees. It costs the taxpayers when you pay and when you don’t.

    It would be cheaper to support the children out of the Treasury, which we do when the father’s dead.

    You see, I was ordered to pay $860 per month for my two sons, now grown. Had I been dead or had the federal government believed that I am dead, the Social Security Administration would have paid survivor’s benefits for my ex-wife and two sons in the amount of $2400 per month.

    I kid you not.

    As for Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox Sucker, plead the Peonage Law, call him the federal criminal he is! Why treat him with kid gloves?

    Your alternatives are: 1) Plead the Peonage Law.
    2) Fake your death and watch your ex make out like a bandit collecting the SS Survivor’s benefit.
    or 3) Plead the Second Amendment. The First Amendment allows you to explain the problem. The Second Amendment is for when people don’t listen.

  • http://www.false-accusers.com TheManOnTheStreet

    “We’re working on it”

    Yea, sure you are. Just not the way you should be. You are working on ways to not get caught doing this sort of crap… that’s more like it.

    TMOTS






Search