= Tuesday, November 20 – Media Matters posts article saying the claim that “women are equal-opportunity domestic abusers” is false.
= Tuesday through Friday – Media Matters editors post 32 of the 63 comments submitted.
= Sometime Friday or Saturday – Media Matters disables posting of any further comments on this article.
= Late Sunday night – RADAR issues an alert, notifying the public that Media Matters is not allowing factual comments that disagree with them.
= Sometime Monday – After RADAR’s alert is distributed, Media Matters’ editors post an additional 31 comments critical of their position, 29 of which had been submitted the previous Wednesday, 1 submitted Thursday, and 1 submitted Friday.

A number of people who received our alert have asked who Media Matters is. The best information we’ve been able to find is at

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299056,00.html.

http://www.mediaradar.org/alert20071127.php

It is pretty well known that DV rates increase with divorce, most likely surrounding the divorce itself. Tremendous emphasis is put on what men do. But my experience suggests that both men’s and women’s violence escalates: there are many control issues, a shortage of personal power, a feeling that things are out of control, jealousy (real and imagined), and of course custody battles.

Given the fact that their article is dumb as a bag of ball peen hammers, I think they should do a follow-up alert/article to straighten the issue out. If they intend to be credible, this is the only option to pursue.

Oddly enough – Media Matters finally started posting comments in favor of Rudov – now the blog looks a bit more realistic and the points are strong that the “Women are the only victims” paradyne took a big hit despite mediamatters attempt at twisting it the other way.

One of my favorite posts though – goes to a misandrist who says and I paraphrase “what a P*ssy” Is this comical or what. Here this guy is claiming to treat women as equals and that Marc is not man enough to do so and then calls Marc a dergatory term which denigrades women as well. As the liberals say – Priceless.

the top three contendors for menscollegeactivist.org…most effective activist of 2007 are..

Marc Rudov
Dr.warren Farrel
Mr. Glenn sacks

I’lle be nominateing MENSCOLLEGEACTIVIST” ..Most influential person of the year very soon….There are 6 contenders and its a very close race!!…

Hey the Menscollegeactivist of the year 2007 might not seem like much, but for historians…It might mean something!!!

See: Online Slime Machine Media Matters Co-Founded by Hillary Clinton
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299056,00.html

That Media Matters took notice of Marc is a great compliment to him.

“like so many right-wing macho men, he probably has a little, itty-bitty pee-pee”

On the bright side, Media Matters has inadvertently done us the service of proving LaSalle’s Law yet again….

LaSalle’s Law: “As an online discussion on the topic of human sexuality grows longer, the probability that someone will impugn a male opponent’s manhood approaches one.”

I think we are going to see a lot of big lawsuits over these things, and see them removed from the consumer market. I do believe the manufacturer may be liable for selling a product that is much more fatal than it is represented to be.

Police are now getting lazy and using tasers as a one-size-fits-all problem solver, instead of saving them for situations involving a large person who is actually physically violent — a person they might not be able to subdue using martial arts skills. Substituting the use of a weapon that is now known to be regularly fatal for good police work is a key legal issue yet to be tested.

From what I can see, none of the recent three deaths involved individuals where a taser was actually called for. This means that huge lawsuits against cities and/or states should be forthcoming, as well as the manufacturer.

There is no substitute for good police work — and this includes tasers. If I had my way, police would spend some time training as cowboys, and learn to use a lasso. There are other “legacy” devices that can also be used to take a person down easily without risk of killing them.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312753,00.html

“Media Matters” Censors Inconvenient Facts

http://www.mediaradar.org/alert20071126.php

Women are just as likely as men to engage in partner aggression.

Men experience over one-third of domestic violence (DV)-related injuries.

Men are far less likely to report DV incidents than women.

The myths about domestic violence are numerous.

Many of these myths are based on DV studies that use biased survey methods.

For support of these statements visit:
http://www.mediaradar.org/media_fact_sheet.php

Also if you have not already this month, donate money to an organization that helps create awareness of the injustices in a feminized America.

http://www.mediaradar.org/donate.php

https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=vP18gtvhF4iOjmN-52g3SbywzZYH-LedRLTPB3a3cCvegcctVIEluX1fZgu&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f3893a48c4ade7e5f78c7750e78748f2bfb42a31f0919a77a

http://www.stephenbaskerville.net

Today American government and media worships women, so they ignore or do not punish a woman for crime. Feminism/s attitude is held strong in America that men are bad and women are good.

In family court there is no jury. In criminal court for domestic violence charges, there are mostly no juries. Most of the discrimination and injustice is at the front end in government enforcement and hearings, while the media, family, and friends show little understanding or compassion.

For a man this makes women a risk to be around (Marc’s point and our point – baby, dating, or marriage strike), and develops a general distrust in the media and government, and I do not want that.

I want justice – consistent decsion making by judges and police and other government employees, and I desire a media and culture that does not worship women.

Gordon Bennett, Roger. That’s a tad harsh. God help us if we got what we deserved for our weaknesses but to equate the punishment to that deserved by the guilty is over the top.

Never mind though, I have a good job in line for you when I become President. I have a little list….

Vote #1 Amfortas. The Fair but Firm One.

If you pled because you QUIT, not because you did it, you deserve the punishment as much as the defendant who did it.

ALWAYS fight it out to the jury trial, and then give the jury a chance.

Unfortunately we don’t get juries in protection order cases and divorces.

But is this a monopoly method exclusively used by feminism, whom themselves must have mastered this from somewhere ?

Perhaps its a legitimate political strategy reserved for worthies to use on unworthies everywhere.

He gets an assault charge. The mother in law is advised to return home (hundreds of miles away) and file a protective order there.

His lawyer quits (doesn’t return his money) when he refuses to agree to a protective order. A protective order is granted (rubber stamped).

He is harassed by the Court hundreds of miles away in an abusive fashion. A “status hearing” is set on the day his grandmother had life threatening surgery. When he asked for a different court date, he was called a liar. When he got an affidavit from the doctor’s office, the doctor was called a liar, etc.

Absolutely incredible. Once he got to a jury on the assault charge the jury acquited him after about 5 minutes deliberation.

There is a lot to be learned from this — one thing is the importance of juries. Most of the extreme abuses whether family law, protective orders, or ERISA all occur in the absence of juries. A lot of the crap would end if we took seriously our constitutional rights to juries (federal and state both) — stop making exceptions and stop denigrating juuries. I have seen juries rule in favor of common sense including in the area of family law and female related criminal allegations over and over and over again. The true abuses usually occur when juries are not involved.