Exhibit “A” is that of a sexually explicit act in the form of a pencil sharpener.
Exhibit “B” is that of a plastic knife block in the form of a human male, it’s color incidentally, is blood red.

One of these exhibits brings to mind horrific, mindless rampages of death and destruction. The other, something that most adult people would find enjoyable.

One exhibit reminds us of the grotesque and brings to mind, even by it’s very color and the placement of the holes, the nature of true evil. The other brings to mind that which most adults regard as an extremely intimate encounter.

But for some people the icing on this cake isn’t that males being portrayed as an object to be massacred, so Sir, it’s that a female is being portrayed as a sex object. Never mind the very clear and startling message the blood red, male-shaped, knife block brings to ones mind, feminazis rail against their kind as being portrayed as a sex object!

I don’t know about you, but I’ll take sex over death any day.

When I was younger, I always thought that a writer had ‘made it’ when they got published. Sad to see that virtually anyone can ‘get published’ today. Especially gender and race baiters.

And for the record, she has never condemned the knife block. I seem to recall her telling someone to “get a sense of humor” when challenged….

Ahhhhh eqalllliteeeee!

TMOTS

In your dreams.”

You see the sexual notion that women hold: men like sex, and wish women liked it. This is learned behavior. We teach this to our children, boys and girls alike. It makes men believe we need women more than we really do. Women believe it too. It is patently untrue. It can be un-learned.

But it is a very useful social convention. Were men to realize how little we really need women, society would unravel. Men have not yet even gained the ability to conveniently and easily control our fertility, and women are already bemoaning the lack of good marryable men. Middle aged middle class single women are, as Glenn pointed out elsewhere, choosing to have children without benefit of marriage. There are, I believe, two reasons for this. One is the marriage strike; the other is much much more troubling to me.

“Liberated” women seem unwilling, or unable, to endure the compromise necessary to actually marry and live with a man. They will say they have been in relationships that they hoped would lead to marriage and children, but “none of the relationships worked.” What these women really mean is they were unwilling to accept someone else at face value, as another imperfect human, and actually compromise some of their deeply-held beliefs in the name of making a marriage work, and for the good of children. Women have been told they can have it all, and that is what they believe. Choosing to become a mother without a father is the ultimate act of self-indulgence. The lack of marryable men is partly due to a genuine shortage; the rest is merely a reflection of women’s uncompromising attitudes.

Olivia, maybe you will be able to find someone you can manipulate long term with that thing you were born with. And then again, maybe not.

There is always one isn’t there. The typical nay-sayer, denier of anything bleeding obvious.

Really need to grow up and smell the anti-male sexism before even considering the privileged princesses “feelings”..

In your dreams.

Don’t ya know? Thats differentttttttttttt!

TMOTS