Men and Marriage are very much alive in India. India has become a raucous battleground between radical feminists and marriage advocates in a very short time span. The Save Indian Family Foundation has approximately 8,000 members, which could make it the largest men’s and marriage organization in the world.
In my analysis, the explosive emergence of the Men’s Marriage Movement in India came about because of two major factors. First, feminists moved in on India like Ghengis Khan. They went overboard, extorted their way into politics, and passed some of the most radical, acid, feminist legislation enacted on earth.
Secondly, the sea-change from marriage to radical feminism occurred very quickly. Most adult Indian men and women alive today were raised in intact families, and marriage is a major piece of their cultural upbringing. They instinctively know that radical feminism is very dangerous and are not going to sit around meekly.
In contrast, feminism assimilated Western cultures much more slowly, and over a period of two generations. Most adults today were raised either in broken families, or according to feminist scripts where men are impressed from birth to not question feminism, to welcome the sexual freedom it bribes them with, and to sit around like toadstools when the pink reaper comes around to collect her due. It has always been difficult to extend the men’s movement beyond the mortally wounded, because men simply have eyes and ears closed to the possibility that radical feminism is ruining the futures of the majority of men and women, who will never know a good marriage or benefit from all the social and economic benefits it provides.
The Gipper made a tragic mistake signing the first no-fault law into existence when he was Governor of California, with Jane Fonda literally sitting at the desk with him. It took the men’s movement 30 years to take its first baby steps, and since 2000 has been finding its first popularity in the media and politics.
Unfortunately, neither political party has a clue that the Men’s Movement is substantively about ending the divorce revolution and restoring marriage values. It is a rare Christian activist who has any awareness either.
If you are sick and tired of our illusory, aimless political system, you must remember who Jane Fonda, Kim Gandy, Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan, Patricia Ireland, Eleanor Smeal are and what they stood for. It is feminist politics that turned the personal into the political, established the art of victim-politics, and formally established a variety of federally-funded political disinformation machines now ramified in the rise of the Hillary Clinton machine.
Feminism has done little since 1960 but legalize the killing of babies by mothers, made prostitution a right, brought about a wanton destruction of marriage, bore a ravenous welfare state constituting the largest line-item in the federal budget, and now demands same-sex marriage.
These are the people who put America into the weak social and economic position it suffers today. Economics dictates that America cannot enjoy a lasting social recovery until the programs and policies destroying the bedrock institution of marriage are cleared from the lawbooks.
When the rest of America gets it right, a magic and unstoppable convergence will occur between healthy social reformers and the political and religious organizations that can change America for the better.
Below is an example of SIFF’s excellent work in India. They are eager students of politics, and I have spent a fair amount of time with their leaders teaching them the ropes. Western men of all ages should take their cue and do the same. Your future does not have to be what it used to be.
����������������-
David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network
����������������-
Rate this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Stumble It!
roger said,
as a friend of mine says, “it is going to get much, much worse before it gets better”.
November 30, 2007 at 9:14 pm
mruffolo said,
http://498a.wordpress.com/category/fathers-rights
Feminism is prospering in India.
“The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 comes into effect Thursday in India.
According to estimates, about 70% of women in India were victims of domestic abuse in some form
Under this law, domestic violence offenders can be jailed for a maximum of one year or fined up to Rs 20,000, or both.
The new law provides an all-encompassing definition of domestic violence including not only physical violence by the husband, such as beating or physically hurting his wife, or sexual violence like forced intercourse, but also verbal or emotional violence such as insulting the wife or preventing her from taking up a job, and even economic violence such as not allowing the wife to use her salary.”
http://hindumommy.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/no-more-domestic-abuse-indian-government
November 30, 2007 at 11:27 pm
snootfish said,
December 1, 2007 at 1:24 am
college activist said,
December 1, 2007 at 2:03 am
David R. Usher said,
The “70% of women in India were victims of domestic abuse” is a flat-out feminist lie, originally published in a UNPF Report that was used as bait for the U.N. Secretary General’s report on domestic violence last year. I thoroughly debunked the report, and demonstrated that the chart this number was lifted from was not even labeled in any recognizable form along the X and Y axis.
The title of the graphic reads “Women Who Believe Wife Beating is Justified for at Least One Reason”. But vertical axis of the graphic contains a misspelling and reads “Percent of ever-married [sic] women ages 15-49 who have ever experienced domestic violence”. Some idiot feminist cooked this up in Excel on evening and dropped it on the world.
This UNPF report is perhaps the most glaring example of feminist hoodoo ever written. Since the information was derived from surveys of battered women’s advocates, using uncontrolled methodologies, the whole report is about as reliable as a spam message from Nigeria asking you to wire a distressed queen some money.
See Fig 5. in my article at http://www.newswithviews.com/Usher/david38.htm
As a result of this article, which was magnified by RADAR and perhaps thousands of advocates working with us, Ambassador John Bolton applied pressure, and the U.N. Third Committed unanimously rejected the U.N. Secretary’s report on domestic violence. A unanimous rejection of anything is extremely rare at the U.N. I reported this event at http://www.newswithviews.com/Usher/david39.htm
But it shows you how stupid people are, and how persistent the feminist rumor mill is. These wackos start a rumor, and even after it has been torn to bits, they still carry on like nobody’s business, demonstrating the fact that they are liars and con artists to anyone willing to take a few minutes evaluating their outrageous claims.
December 1, 2007 at 2:23 am
amfortas said,
With a little adaptation and focus on more local issues and people it would make a fine encouragement for one or two of our smaller and more recent Family oriented political parties here. May I do that, with acknowlegement, of course?
December 1, 2007 at 8:22 am
mruffolo said,
This website also attemps to explain the future disastrous results of badly formulated and gender biased law “Domestic violence against women law - 2005 which grossly violates the liberty and dignity of an average man and his family members. Anyone who is educated and reads the guidelines of the law can see how vicious this law is and what it’s social implications will be.”
http://498a.org
December 1, 2007 at 9:50 am
mruffolo said,
Even an Animal has a Ministry and Welfare Division.
Why not Indian Men?
An appeal to Indian Government to Form Ministry of Men’s Welfare
As per Crime Bureau of India, more then 72000 men commit suicide every year
http://498a.org/contents/Publicity/Invitation_Int‘l%20Men’s%20Day_Nov19th2007.pdf
December 1, 2007 at 9:52 am
Denis said,
December 1, 2007 at 10:30 am
GreatMRNI said,
1. “But it shows you how stupid people are, and how persistent the feminist rumor mill is. These wackos start a rumor, and even after it has been torn to bits, they still carry on like nobody’s business, demonstrating the fact that they are liars and con artists to anyone willing to take a few minutes evaluating their outrageous claims”.
Excellent point
Using lies, rumors, and innuendoes as weapons of control has been a feminist strategy for quite some time. If you observe schools girls interacting with each other you will notice these juvenile techniques employed at a very early age. Even though these techniques are juvenile, they are also affective. Its end result is chaos, not conflict resolution, or social cohesion. Males use hierarchical social structures in determining leadership roles based on merit (intelligence, wealth, physical stature, athletic prowess, and skill).
Using lies, rumors, and innuendoes works to sever established relationships and undermines existing power structures. So once again, do we really want to be moving towards a more feminized society?
December 1, 2007 at 12:08 pm
mruffolo said,
Suggest me how to overcome from this situation.”
http://www.498a.org/victimStories.htm#v3
“i got married in the month of may in 2004, she stayed with us for two months then suddenly she raised a issue to separate to live from my parents,(since her parents came to the city where we r living).
i refused to stay without my parents…then immdtly she has given me two options
1.i have to transfer all my assets on her name if she lives with my parents
2.i have to live separately with her along with her parents
i refused for both options……
since then the negotiations r going on but ultimately they have taken extreme step to file the case.
so finally they filed the case on three of us(myself,mom and dad).when they filed the case i was out of town so my parents faced this worst situation and one night they were behind the bars.
now they came for out of court settlement…..could u pls help me how to go about it?”
http://www.498a.org/victimStories.htm#v4
December 1, 2007 at 1:15 pm
college activist said,
Esther Vilar in her bestseller..”The manipulated man” states that it is a very bad mistake to put the welfare of men into the hands of the women,…. she say’s women are more selfish, and callous, and will flush the welfare of men down the toilet in a heartbeat!!
Filter through all the hysteria propaganda, and look at the facts…And you will see that putting the welfare of men and children into the hands of the women…Is disastrously barbaric!!
..Esther Vilar…states her case much more eloquently than myself!!
December 1, 2007 at 3:38 pm
daveinga said,
this is a fight we cannot afford to lose, for the sake of future generations.
keep hammering ‘em. it is working. not so long ago it seemed i stood alone. thanks to the internet we now have a voice. before there was nothing. we now have friends in other countries fighting against this same family virus. many men and women all over the world are now aware of the problem. our numbers grow w/ every diseased court decision. destroying families to appease women and make money is wrong. we are in the right. we can win.
we must win.
December 1, 2007 at 9:52 pm
redrajesh said,
December 2, 2007 at 2:19 pm
amfortas said,
Psyche loses Eros by trying to ‘look upon him’ in his sleep after ignoring Hera - a prohibition to young girls, not to even try to see into a man’s soul to understand him. Don’t we ever see that in teen girls! They ‘intuitively’ ‘know’ everything about men!! ™ by 15. Some of the advice is wise after a fashion but nevertheless wily.
The old crone sets tasks for young psyche and tells of how to do them and avoid disaster: taking ram’s wool (male power) from the field’s hedges instead of confronting the ram and taking it from his back; lowering a cup into the river (sexual life) instead of jumping in with a bucket and being swept away; gaining the salve of femininity from the old mothers in Hades after finding their hidded island in a lake, she warns ‘do not save the drowning man’ when she is rowing back. Well, most women seem to grasp that one all right.
It is interesting that in the legends, a women has to go into the depths of hell to find her womanliness, and ignore men’s humanitarian needs. I guess Indian women are like women all over and Greek myths are as powerful at explaining them as Hindu ones.
December 2, 2007 at 6:37 pm
Indian_Crusader said,
because men were ashamed to tell thier flight and struggle; because of insult and even they are telling truth no ne will beleive in them.
In India women are treated as DEVIs (godess) which no other country in the world, treat women like that.
media always listen to women, and people also want to read about them.
but in reality is, reverse of this.
Read whats going on really behind four walls, in every home
http://mynation.net/study-report-indianhusbands.htm
or http://mynation.net
December 3, 2007 at 5:02 am
Elusive Wapiti said,
The courseware for that class was largely provided by the UN. One of the course textbooks was “Development as Freedom” by Amartya Sen, a prominent Indian scholar with strong ties to the UN. Another of the course texts was published by the UN University Press itself. Not surprisingly, much of this scholarship was shot through by feminist thought–researched as it was by feminist groups with funding from departments within the UN dedicated to the elevation of the condition of woemn–and a not insignificant portion of course time was dedicated to women’s rights, children’s rights (somehow those two always were conflated together), and missing women in the backwaters of India and Sinkiang.
At any rate, one of Sen’s central theses to his book was the use of mortality statistics as a proxy for human security and prima facie evidence of discrimination. Sen expounded that, since infant girls face unusually high mortality rates in India, there must be de facto social discrimination against girls. Thus, higher mortality, lower human security, and therefore there must be discrimination somewhere that’s making that happen.
Fast forward to the end of the term. For my final project in the class, I applied Sen’s thesis to the state of the human condition in India. Except that I went the opposite direction. You should have seen the looks on the faces of the young female feminists in the class (as a grad student, I was about 8-9 years older than the rank-and-file students) and the unawakened men when I applied Sen’s thesis to the higher across-the-board mortality rate for men and boys in India, especially in the urban areas, and concluded that it was not women who were systemically discriminated against, it was men. To the instructor’s great credit, he was happy to see a different perspective than usual.
I then questioned the morally dubious practice of dedicated budget items and dedicated governmental departments for a numerically majority group that enjoyed the lowest mortality rates (except for sex-selecting abortions, which the feminists hate since it kills girls disproportionately. I guess abortion would be okay if it killed as many or more boys than girls).
If there’s interest out there, I can post my research paper on my blog.
December 4, 2007 at 11:20 am
chuck said,
We might well use it to our advantage – if it applies to a significant part of what’s happening around the world where victim feminists are attacking men by means of attacking marriage.
The opposition here is the Women’s Anti-marriage Movement; a loose confederation of immature females who combine greed, scapegoating, and self righteousness. Women who want the rights of marriage; money, property, children– without the responsibilities; commitment and sharing.
And all of this is made possible by a huge and publically funded propaganda system.
December 4, 2007 at 5:57 pm
mruffolo said,
I’ve heard the socialzation arguement before.
Here’s another. Sen. Hillary Clinton has a trust problem because America is socialized not trust strong, capable women compared to strong, capable men.
http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-opger045486775dec04,0,7259476.story
Post your paper please.
December 4, 2007 at 8:13 pm
Elusive Wapiti said,
I will do as you ask. Will take me a couple of days, though…it’s big. Let me know what you think when I complete posting it.
Cheers,
EW
December 5, 2007 at 10:29 pm
Elusive Wapiti said,
The first chapter of my paper is up. Will post more chapters over next few days. Click here to read all that I have posted.
Cheers,
EW
December 6, 2007 at 12:57 pm
bharati said,
December 11, 2007 at 8:52 am