Canadian Feminist Legislator Falsely Accuses, Humiliates Male Colleague

2007-12-13
By

Canadian New Democrat MP Irene Mathyssen (pictured), the shadow cabinet minister for the anti-male Status of Women Canada, chose to falsely accuse and humiliate a male colleague on the floor of the Canadian House of Commons last week. In a recent column, Canadian National Post columnist Barbara Kay wrote:

“New Democrat MP Irene Mathyssen looked over the shoulder of Conservative MP, James Moore where he sat in the front row of the government benches Tuesday night, and saw what seemed to her to be a seductively dressed woman on the screen of his laptop computer. This is his personal computer, you understand, so her inspection of his screen was tantamount to viewing his private papers or mail, and she had not asked permission or been invited to look at it. Just so we’re clear on the principle.

“OK, so let’s start again. Ms Mathyssen was eavesdropping on Mr Moore. She didn’t know who the ‘scantily clad’ woman on the screen was, but having brooded on the possibilities overnight, then rose the next day on a point of privilege to allege he was viewing inappropriate material. The implication in such an allegation, let’s be clear, is that the man is a pervert. As a result a mortified Moore was forced to issue a public denial that he was looking at pornography. Turns out it was his girlfriend. Oops, my bad, Ms Mathyssen realizes, so she calls Mr Moore and apologizes. Case closed for her.

“But perhaps not for Mr Moore. He just got put through a bit of a wringer for nothing.

“Let’s unpack this incident a bit. What MP would be so idiotic as to take the risk of visiting a porn site in the House of Commons on a computer whose screen is open to any busybody? What was Ms Mathyssen’s motive in ‘outing’ him when she had no evidence to support her supposition? Scantily clad women are all over the Internet and also all over real life. Scantily clad is in fact the norm in fashion.

“What would Ms Mathyssen have done if she happened to look over the shoulder of a female MP and actually did see soft porn? Would she rise on a point of personal privilege to humiliate a woman colleague? I think not. I think she would have protected her. And let’s not pretend that women never look at porn. Ms Mathyssen clearly relished the opportunity to embarrass a man caught in the act of being a typical man according to the feminist playbook.”

Kay suggests that the men in Mathyssen’s district vote her out of office. I heartily agree. The full article is False allegations claims another male victim, this time MP James Moore (12/7/07).

10 views

  • college activist

    ..It’s called female empowerment!!!

    Weve given women the omnipotent…”hysteria Klan lynch” power!!

  • amfortas

    Hansard, the next day.

    (James Moore – Cons) Mr Speaker. A Point of Order.

    (Speaker) Yes, The House recognises Mr Moore. You have the floor.

    (Moore) Mr Speaker, I draw members’ attention to the arsewipe Ms Mathyssen’s unfounded attack on the Character of one of Her Majesty’s loyal subjects’ Honourable Representatives. That facsimile for a lobotomy survivor contravened Standing Orders by corruptly, Mr Speaker, corruptly reading the email of another member of this august Parliament. This is, I understand, Mr Speaker, still a hanging offense in The Commonwealth of Canada. (shouts of ‘ang the bitch, bring a blindfold, eh? The Rope !).

    Further, Mr Speaker, she used her short sighted, squinty eyed glimpse at one such email – from a constituent , Mr Speaker, a CONSTITUENT, Mr Speaker who has a right to having her confidential communications with her preferred Member kept confidential, Mr Speaker, and not hawked around the chamber like Ms Mathyssen’s toy-person, Tobi, whom I understand she leads around with a chain attached to her collar, Mr Speaker – HER collar – and keeps chained to the foot of her manky bed, of which, Mr Speaker, I am lead to understand, she has not taken the sheets off for six weeks. SIX weeks Mr Speaker. I draw the Minister for Health’s attention to both Ms Mathyssen’s sheets and her need for spectacles., Mr Speaker. (Cries of , the Sheets, the sheets, a poke in the eye, eh)

    Mr. Speaker, my constituent sent me a private photo of herself, PRIVATE and confidential, Mr Speaker, dressed in shoddy clothes produced in Mathyssen’s own constituency, Mr Speaker, by one of her constituents, Mr Speaker, clothing made by women, for women, Mr Speaker, in appalling conditions, and SCRIMPING on materials in an egregious display of greed and depravity and total lack of concern for fairness and equity in their business dealings, Mr Speaker. In this cold weather. I draw the attention of the Minister for Consumer Affairs to this willful rip-off of our fine Canadian Women, Mr Speaker. Excluding the likes of Ms Mathyssen, Mr Speaker’

    Mr Speaker, my constituent was providing proof, Mr Speaker, clear evidence that her clothes barely covered her private parts, let alone kept her warm and protected from the harsh Manitoba winter. And please note Mr Speaker that she is from Manitoba and not Womanitoba. (cries of Private mail. Private parts, Parliamentary scrutiny, eh?)

    Further, Mr Speaker, Ms Mathyssen’s playground attempt to get me into trouble with the teacher by accusing me of reading ‘inappropriate material’ – and I ask you Mr Speaker, what is more appropriate than Constituents’ mail? – was in fact a wormy and immature attempt to ingratiate herself with the Alpha Girls on the opposite benches, and was at the expense of my cold and barely able to clothe-herself-properly constituent, Mr Speaker. (cries of , Scandalous, rip her clothes off, eh, lets see if she likes the cold)

    Mr Speaker, as a Man I am used to frivolous, false and vexatious allegations from feminazi scumsuckers, as indeed is my constituent, a fair and reasonable woman whom Ms Mathyssen considers to be no better than the millions of women who regularly display their private parts, for profit, Mr Speaker, on her OWN laptop. (Cries of Shame. shame, Show us yer tits, eh?)

    Women who support Feminism, Mr Speaker, demanding the right to express themselves with empowerment, Mr Speaker, and make their living income by BEING inappropriate, Mr Speaker !. (Excited cries of “Innapropriate. Millions of Feminists, eh”)

    Mr Speaker, I call upon the Party Whips to take Ms Mathyssen in hand and provide the required Disciplines as laid down in Standing Orders. Thank you Mr Speaker

    (Cries of Whips Whips, Bring on the Party Whips, Let’s have a party. Is it BYO?, eh ?).

    (The House enterd a short period of disarray! )

  • PolishKnight

    . What MP would be so idiotic as to take the risk of visiting a porn site in the House of Commons on a computer whose screen is open to any busybody?

    Rep. Mark Foley got busted for similar shenanegans.

    The best answer to this harpie would have been: “If I was looking at such material, I can assure you none of them would be feminists.”

    The problem with such a barb is that it would bring down the wrath of the whole commie/leftist/feminist machine in Canada on the poor guy’s back.

    The good news is that moderates such as GW Bush in the state, already have a big target on their back thereby making their moderation worthless.

  • jackal1994

    It’s interesting. I often argue with Israeli’s and Jews on USAToday bulletin board threads. Every article has a comments section where people can discuss the article.

    So I decided to read the Torah the five books of Moses. I just finished Genesis and was about to start Exodus.

    What’s interesting in this book is their is constantly this concept that A) women are property. Many times I read about some man doing a good deed for another man or family and a father will offer his daughter in marriage to the other man as a gift.

    B) the book seems to paint women only worth something for procreation. A number of stories I’ve read so far where the wives were barren were so shook up by it, that they offered their maids as concubines (apparently with God’s blessing) to have baby’s that would still ‘count’ as the wive’s bloodline.

    It’s interesting that the moment we started treating women as people they F’d all of society up.






Search