Hillary Clinton, Cultural Marxist
When Hillary Rodham arrived at Yale Law School in the fall of 1969, the long-awaited Revolution seemed to be at hand. Students declared a “liberated zone” on the main quadrangle and erected tents for endless teach-ins. The university was forced to adopt pass-fail grading. And the pungent scent of sweet-smelling marijuana was redolent in the autumn air.
Within months of her arrival, Hillary signed on to the board of editors of the newly-established Yale Review of Law and Social Action. The Review’s purpose was “to present forms of legal scholarship and journalism which focus on programmatic solutions to social problems.” The cover photo of the first issue depicted police brandishing weapons to illustrate an article on “University and the Police: Force and Freedom on Campus.”
One of Hillary’s closest faculty mentors was Thomas I. Emerson, a constitutional scholar affectionately known as “Tommie the Commie.” It was in his class that Hillary first laid eyes on a bearded William Jefferson Clinton. She sported Gloria Steinem glasses and board-straight long hair – the former Goldwater Girl had turned iconic hippie.
That spring Rodham signed up for Emerson’s civil liberties class, notes Carl Bernstein in A Woman in Charge. The course entailed monitoring the local trial of Black Panther Bobby Seale who had allegedly murdered a former Panther-turned-police-informant. Hillary was charged with scheduling the student watch-dogs so every minute of the trial would be scrutinized. After all, who could trust White Man’s justice?
A subsequent edition of the Review of Law and Social Action was devoted to the Black Panther trial. The issue featured drawings of policemen depicted as decapitated and eviscerated pigs. By now Hillary had been promoted to associate editor of the magazine.
Interesting note, Hillary’s personal involvement with the Black Panther trial or the Review of Law and Social Action is never mentioned in her autobiography.
Barbara Olson, writing in The Final Days, reveals how Hillary studied the Critical Legal Studies school. Unabashedly Marxist, Critical Legal Studies uses a “deconstructionist” model to subvert the law and engineer social transformation.
During this time Rodham met Marian Wright Edelman of the Children’s Defense Fund who soon became Hillary’s confidante. Hillary spent the summer of 1970 in Washington DC working at her side. Edelman would later admit to the truth of her duplicitous agenda: “I got the idea that children might be a very effective way to broaden the base for change.”
Beginning her second year at Yale, Hillary devoted herself to the cause of abused and neglected children, once helping a local hospital to develop legal procedures to deal with suspected child abuse. Another time she helped represent a foster mother adopt her two-year old ward.
Those experiences led Rodham to publish “Children under the Law” in the Harvard Educational Review. That article ridiculed the antiquated notion that families should be seen as “private, nonpolitical units.” Making the over-the-top comparison that, “Along with the family, past and present examples of such [dependency] arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian reservation system,” Rodham argued for the need to “remodel” the family and grant children a legal right to sue their parents.
The summer of 1971 Hillary traveled to California to work at the Oakland law office of Robert Treuhaft, described by the New York Times as a “radical law firm that specialized in fighting every kind of discrimination and social injustice.”
Treuhaft was a former member of the Communist Party USA, leaving the party only after Khrushchev’s revelations about Stalin’s massacres. Treuhaft later confided that Hillary “certainly … was in sympathy with all the left causes.”
The following summer Hillary found herself working for the George McGovern presidential campaign in Texas. McGovern, the anti-war candidate, had earlier headed the Democratic commission that mandated quotas for women and Blacks in state delegations.
By the end of her stint at Yale, friend Sara Ehrman described Hillary’s politics as “liberal, ideological.” Representative Dick Armey was more candid: “Her thoughts sound a lot like Karl Marx. She hangs around with a lot of Marxists. All her friends are Marxists.” Author Barbara Olson put it this way: “Hillary was a budding Leninist, Menshevik, Bolshevik, Trotskyite … What really mattered to Lenin – and what Saul Alinsky taught Hillary to value – was power.”
Pinch yourself — this is the same Hillary Rodham Clinton who is now serving as the honorable senator from New York, who aspires to the United States presidency, and who seeks to “remodel” our families to conform to a socialist utopia.
| More from Carey Roberts
Stumble It!


December 13th, 2007 at 8:33 am
WE all know that Hillary is a devout socialist who has accomplished nothing in life other than being “married” to the POTUS. The question is: how do we get that message across to the bulk of the American people, who are continuously brainwashed to adore Hillary by the fauning media? Carey, you are totally correct in this article, but you are preaching to the choir. We need a new Swift Boat equivalent to identify her for what she is.
December 13th, 2007 at 10:24 am
Hillary is truely a scary person. If she obtains the predidency we are in big trouble. That is why I have a website dedicated to talking about what she and the dems really is all about.
http://www.move-off.org
patriotsofamerica@move-off.org
December 13th, 2007 at 10:45 am
Her college years were almost forty years ago. How is that relevant? Why don’t you go back to kindergarten as was done to Obama?
People change over time. Maybe Hillary hasn’t, maybe she has. Are you implying that she still smokes pot or what? This was an entirely pointless read.
December 13th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
Tony – certainly if Hillary goes back to Obama’s kindergarten for HER material, others should look at the foundation from which hillary springs. Know your opposition. That is just basic strategic thinking.
Hillary’s group is now leveling charges against Obama regarding his drug use.
Is it fair for HER campaign to do that?
Has anyone asked HER if she has every smoked pot or done other illegal drugs?
If not, why not? She most likely has.
And, why hasn’t the press started asking her how her husband’s infidelity affected her marriage and relationship with the President? Dems have gone after Guliani on this, why not Mrs. Bill Clinton? Wife of an impeached president, and apparent collaborator in character assassination for all of President Bill’s women.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:34 am
The Wife’s Role In The Home by Dr. Tony Evans
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_Alternative/archives.asp?bcd=2007-12-12
December 16th, 2007 at 10:38 am
The Husband’s Role In The Home by Dr. Tony Evans
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_Alternative/archives.asp?bcd=12/7/2007
December 16th, 2007 at 12:43 pm
Carey, God bless you! You are a gem. I have wondered for years how the Baby Boomer white, upper-middle class, America hating gang came into being. I found some light in “The Revolt of the Elites”. Your article provided more.
What sickens me most was the section on Marian Wright Edelman. The left have used children mercilessly to advance their cause and neglected and abused them at the same time.
Tony Ananda: What you are implying, Mr Ananda, is that the fact that Lenin’s brother was shot by the Czarist police had nothing to do with the Russian Revolution. I think you’d better take another look at that.