GameWaster.com: Online Games, Educational Games, Puzzles, Action, Cards, Arcade, Sports Games
Custom Search
David R. Usher
Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home

Christmas is the season when feminist judges and aspiring prosecutors appease the Pink Aristocracy by rounding up all those guys who can’t afford to pay fixed-sums of “child support” demanded to finance feminist divorce-for-the-hell-of-it. Combine this jolly style of secular Mussolinism with a Presidential election, and it all comes straight back down the chimney.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, the latest thought-provoking example for your reading pleasure:

The New York Daily News reports that Hillary’s youngest brother, Anthony Rodham, is a deadbeat to the tune of $158,000 in child support, alimony, and interest. It is known that Rodham is “cash strapped”, as is customary in the majority of feminist-styled “deadbeat dad” cases.

Anthony married the daughter of radical-feminist legislator Barbara Boxer. Needless to say, a marriage made in pink hell will probably also end that way.

Perhaps Democrats and Republicans alike can learn important lessons from this case. For starters: feminism eats all men for dinner — regardless of party affiliation – including guys on both sides of the aisle who were stupid enough to be foot-servants or henchmen helping feminists destroy the institution of marriage. That’s what men get for allowing themselves to be dragged around by the male appendage.

Feminism promoted Hillary into her unearned candidacy for President of the United States. To appear politically-saleable (since marriage is actually important in the minds of voters), she had to ignore Bill’s philandering — which also gave her sanctified privilege to commit acts of domestic violence against her husband — and additionally to wreak many acts of feminist legislative terrorism on the American plebiscite (and expect Bill to do the same). Now feminism has come full-circle to bite her in the nether end. (Please make special note of the strangeness cult feminism has inflicted on the American people as well, who often have not the finances or political connections to survive it).

This case presents a fascinating political conundrum. Normally, judges and prosecutors often lock up poor deadbeat hostages knowing that a close relative, usually the parents, will cash in their retirement savings to free the hostage. With this very large arrearage Anthony Rodham is near the top of America’s hostage list. He should have been watching Oprah in the can for some time now.

So why is he not writing letters from jail right now? If Boxer pushes for incarceration (to make Hillary and Bill pay), the Democratic party would instantly implode. Boxer appears to be withholding her endorsement of Hillary as the not-so-subtle wedge to push the Clintons into buying her brother out of penury. After all, Bill Clinton could redeem Hillary’s brother from the proceeds of just one speaking engagement (not so easy for the rest of us). Isn’t it lovely when feminist Goliaths extort their peers in the middle of a Presidential race?

Deadbeat feminist politics hurts everyone. Once everyone realizes that child support must be ordered as a percentage of actual income, and limited to items that actually “are” child support, we will end entitled destruction of marriage. While most folks do not know enough to verbalize the details, they know in their guts and soul it is wrong.

Feminist federal laws destroy about half of all marriages regardless of one’s party affiliation or rank in the party. The span of entitlements enticing women to legally trade husbands like whites once traded slaves is vast and powerful. This being the case, it is astonishing that neither party has adopted a strong marriage values agenda in either the congressional or Presidential races.

In closing: a word of advice for aspiring deadbeat politicians. Anybody who shills feminist policy in the future will have a short political career. Many prosecutors and politicians have lost races trying to play this card. If you don’t believe me, just ask former Senators John Ashcroft or Jim Talent what dragged them down. Those who are running with both sides of their brains functioning will find that Marriage Values policies will capture the minds and hearts of the majority of voters. Marriage Values policy will resolve the majority of Congress’s intractable legislative problems, such as poverty and health care coverage, which Congress can never possibly resolve via feminist approaches.

————————————————-

David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network, and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | Other posts by David R. Usher

Stumble It!

book mark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home in del.icio.us | Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home to Slashdot.com | Submit Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home to Digg.com | Submit Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home in Furl | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home in Spurl | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home in Reddit | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home in Tailrank | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home in Newsvine | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home to Yahoo! | Bookmark Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home to Fark

8 Comments »

  1. daveinga said,

    good stuff dave. thanks.

    i was wondering if you knew how these “exorbitant interest rates and fees all ’round” figure in on the Federal matching funds the states collect on CS dollars. do the FMF’s apply to these numbers as well?

    i thought you did a good job the other night. keep it up.

    December 20, 2007 at 9:55 pm

  2. roger said,

    Dave - the link to the aricle in NY newspaper does not work. Can you provide another link?

    December 21, 2007 at 9:37 am

  3. Robert Stevens said,

    It is going to take men and women too, standing up to these GiSKERS( government sponsore kidnapping and extortion racket. A friend of mine dreamed up that little term and I like it)
    It is going to be hard, but the “legal system” is never going to be any use against these GiSKERS. The only thing that will work is cut off the money. since they are dependent on federal matching funds to operate, this will get their attention and their anger. They will have to given a very simple but very tough choice. Either strainghten up and act right, or get your money cut off. After a while they will either reform or be on the unemployment line. This is a tough method, but it is the only thing I think is going to work. Thier system is far to corrupt to self correct without some very serious pressure being applied to it. We will have to make them do it
    As far as the political climate is concerned, everyone concerned about the future of this country ,needs to inform every politician and political candidate that this issue needs to be addressed and addressed correctly.
    Make it clear that will not accept any system that is not fair and reasonable. We will not accept an arrangement that discriminate against fathers/men and will not accept a system that is not accountable to us.
    That the system needs drastic reforms and the government needs to have a bunch of it power taken away. We need to protect marriage and hold women to the same stand of conduct as men have always been held to.
    We will also need to repeal a lot the laws passed in the past 30 years which give women the advantage. NO… I not saying we deny them rights or protection, just that the playing field be leveled. Make it to where a man has an even chance. The system will no longer be a ” shake down racket ” operating under the colour of law. Some people will be upset, but we can either solve the problems or one day have to have a revolution.

    December 21, 2007 at 11:01 am

  4. Scott Strohm said,

    Roger,

    While you’re at the newspaper’s Website, search for “Anthony Rodham.” You can see an abstract for free, but seeing the whole article from the Website will cost you. (Alternatively, if your local puplic library has the December 20 edition of the paper, you can see it there, too).

    December 21, 2007 at 11:17 am

  5. David R. Usher said,

    They apparently moved the article. Here is the direct link:
    http://www.nypost.com/seven/12202007/news/nationalnews/hills_brother_a_deadbeat_514395.htm

    December 21, 2007 at 12:42 pm

  6. DcFather said,

    Interesting conundrum. What does a man-hating neo-Marxist feminist do when everything she and her husband stand for comes back to ruin her own brother?

    My guess is she will sell out her own brother long before admitting to her own hypocrisy, based on her past actions of course. Anybody who can look the other way while his/her efforts ruin and destroy the lives of millions of children is unlikely to have any concern for their own family either.

    She’ll probably spend twenty times what it would take to bail out the brother on legal and consultant fees just trying to come up with some angle/approach to keep her (and his) dumbed-down followers ignorant and blissful, starting with censoring the media from discussing the situation in the first place.

    December 21, 2007 at 3:19 pm

  7. Roger Knight said,

    Wouldn’t it be great if Anthony Rodham loudly screamed for the enforcement of the Peonage Law against the Boxer bitches and the idiot judges who did this to him.

    I would also love to hear him condemn his sister for supporting this garbage.

    December 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm

  8. daveinga said,

    the politically expedient thing would be for the money to suddenly appear and “poof”, problem solved. this is chump change to her.

    December 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MND Opinion
editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter
RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY