<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Judiciary: Tyranny&#8217;s Active Agent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:12:59 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger F. Gay</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/comment-page-1/#comment-56857</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger F. Gay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/#comment-56857</guid>
		<description>The view I&#039;ve developed from studying the downfall of the Constitution, marriage, and family is that the two parties run the country just as any two rival criminal organizations would. The judiciary is composed of people who have party affiliation, and follow the orders of the gang regardless of what the formal rules require.

When &quot;reform&quot; is driven by billions of dollars doled out to friends by Congress merely for the sake of corruption and the judiciary spits on the Constitution to allow it; i find simply blaming judges an inadequate explanation. Certainly, they should overturn laws that are unconstitutional, and deserve to have the blame for that squarely on their shoulders. But to conclude that the judiciary makes these changes on their own - out of thin air - is entirely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The view I&#8217;ve developed from studying the downfall of the Constitution, marriage, and family is that the two parties run the country just as any two rival criminal organizations would. The judiciary is composed of people who have party affiliation, and follow the orders of the gang regardless of what the formal rules require.</p>
<p>When &#8220;reform&#8221; is driven by billions of dollars doled out to friends by Congress merely for the sake of corruption and the judiciary spits on the Constitution to allow it; i find simply blaming judges an inadequate explanation. Certainly, they should overturn laws that are unconstitutional, and deserve to have the blame for that squarely on their shoulders. But to conclude that the judiciary makes these changes on their own &#8211; out of thin air &#8211; is entirely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snootfish</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/comment-page-1/#comment-56852</link>
		<dc:creator>snootfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/#comment-56852</guid>
		<description>The real problem is exactly the opposite.

The Courts sit on their hands and do nothing as Congress and the President endlessly violate the constitution.

The Courts have finally made some relatively limp wristed objections to the patriot act but it should have done much more, for example.

Roe v. Wade is an exception.  The day in and day out status quo is that the Court sits on its hands while the other branches of government violate the constitution endlessly and eggregiously.

I like Jay Leno&#039;s commentary.  It went something like:

       We are helping Iraq write a constitution.
       Why don&#039;t we just give them ours?
       After all, we aren&#039;t using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem is exactly the opposite.</p>
<p>The Courts sit on their hands and do nothing as Congress and the President endlessly violate the constitution.</p>
<p>The Courts have finally made some relatively limp wristed objections to the patriot act but it should have done much more, for example.</p>
<p>Roe v. Wade is an exception.  The day in and day out status quo is that the Court sits on its hands while the other branches of government violate the constitution endlessly and eggregiously.</p>
<p>I like Jay Leno&#8217;s commentary.  It went something like:</p>
<p>       We are helping Iraq write a constitution.<br />
       Why don&#8217;t we just give them ours?<br />
       After all, we aren&#8217;t using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Knight</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/comment-page-1/#comment-56837</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/#comment-56837</guid>
		<description>So then, how DO we enforce the Constitution when the legislative and executive branches insist on violating the rights set forth therein?

Such as when the Newt Gingrich Republican Congress threw divorced fathers under the bus!  And continued to expand the federal government in many areas outside Article I Section 8 and the Appropriate Legislation Clauses.  My reaction to the 2006 election is &quot;Thus ever to RINO&#039;s&quot;.

The failure to enforce the specifically enumerated rights: due process, equal protection, freedom from bills of attainder, freedom from slavery and involuntary servitude, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, freedom from excessive fines and bails, is a far more serious problem then letting a 17 year old girl get an abortion when her prom date proved more effective than she wanted.

The problem is not that the judiciary can enforce the Constitution.

The problem is the PERVERSITY of the judges who strictly enforce a right never agreed to by 2/3 of both houses of Congress and by 3/4 of the several states, abortion, while not enforcing those rights specifically agreed to.

I am sick and tired of so-called conservatives who go on and on about abortion while being thunderingly silent about the willful failure to enforce the specifically enumerated rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then, how DO we enforce the Constitution when the legislative and executive branches insist on violating the rights set forth therein?</p>
<p>Such as when the Newt Gingrich Republican Congress threw divorced fathers under the bus!  And continued to expand the federal government in many areas outside Article I Section 8 and the Appropriate Legislation Clauses.  My reaction to the 2006 election is &#8220;Thus ever to RINO&#8217;s&#8221;.</p>
<p>The failure to enforce the specifically enumerated rights: due process, equal protection, freedom from bills of attainder, freedom from slavery and involuntary servitude, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, freedom from excessive fines and bails, is a far more serious problem then letting a 17 year old girl get an abortion when her prom date proved more effective than she wanted.</p>
<p>The problem is not that the judiciary can enforce the Constitution.</p>
<p>The problem is the PERVERSITY of the judges who strictly enforce a right never agreed to by 2/3 of both houses of Congress and by 3/4 of the several states, abortion, while not enforcing those rights specifically agreed to.</p>
<p>I am sick and tired of so-called conservatives who go on and on about abortion while being thunderingly silent about the willful failure to enforce the specifically enumerated rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amfortas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/comment-page-1/#comment-56826</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/28/the-judiciary-tyrannys-active-agent/#comment-56826</guid>
		<description>Lex facit Regem, let&#039;s face it, has produced a host of mad, bad Kings. As society at large has largely replaced Kings, the law has turned its attention to producing mad, bad societies. Maybe it is time for a new legal declaration: The Law makes its own Opportunities for Power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex facit Regem, let&#8217;s face it, has produced a host of mad, bad Kings. As society at large has largely replaced Kings, the law has turned its attention to producing mad, bad societies. Maybe it is time for a new legal declaration: The Law makes its own Opportunities for Power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
