Norweigan Gov. Minister Attacks Shared Parenting, Pushes Feminist Family Law Policy
Reidar Hjermann, Norway’s ombudsman for children, is now pushing one of vindictive divorced or separated mothers’ greatest hits–that shared parenting is bad for kids because it’s “inconvenient.” According to this recent Norwegian newspaper article:
“‘Children need individually tailored solutions,’ ombudsman Reidar Hjermann told newspaper Aftenposten on Wednesday. He thinks that splitting their time between their parents’ new homes should be the exception, not the rule.
“When parents split up, Hjermann acknowledges that they have to split up everything from their shared home to the cars, TV and stereo. Their children, however, shouldn’t be part of the math.
“‘You can’t just share children in accordance with what’s right for the parents,’ he said. Spending one week living with their mother and one week with their father is too stressful for many, he claims.”
I agree that such arrangements are inconvenient for children, but losing your father or turning dad into a few days a month “visitor” is not just inconvenient–it’s very harmful. Hjermann puts it in gender neutral terms but fortunately Labour Party politician Karita Bekkemellem (pictured), Norway’s former government minister in charge of family issues, explained what the Hjermann plan really means:
“‘It’s most unfortunate that in 2008, the children’s ombudsman doesn’t equate the positions of mother and father,’ she told Aftenposten. She claims that too many fathers feel short-changed, when their wives are all too often granted custody of the children.
“Without shared living arrangements, ‘only one of the parents gets to have close contact with the children in everyday life,’ Bekkemellem said. ‘All our experience shows that it will continue to be the fathers who are discriminated against.’”
The “inconvenient” and “individually tailored solutions” arguments are frequently put forward by American feminists, including the National Organization for Women, in opposition to shared parenting. Hjermann even trots out one of the feminists’ favorite straw men–that some divorced parents want their children to attend two different schools, in order to live part-time with the mother and part-time with the father. I agree that such a suggestion is ludicrous, but I very much doubt that people suggest it.
To learn more about the arguments in favor of shared parenting, including what adult children of divorce have to say on the matter, see my co-authored column HB 5267 Will Help Michigan’s Children of Divorce (Lansing State Journal, 5/28/06). One quick excerpt:
“When Arizona State University psychology professor William Fabricius conducted a study of college students who had experienced their parents’ divorces while they were children, he found that over two-thirds believed that ‘living equal amounts of time with each parent is the best arrangement for children.’ His findings were published in Family Relations in 2003.”
“Children need individually tailored solutions,” ombudsman Reidar Hjermann told newspaper Aftenposten on Wednesday. He thinks that splitting their time between their parents’ new homes should be the exception, not the rule.
When parents split up, Hjermann acknowledges that they have to split up everything from their shared home to the cars, TV and stereo. Their children, however, shouldn’t be part of the math.
“You can’t just share children in accordance with what’s right for the parents,” he said. Spending one week living with their mother and one week with their father is too stressful for many, he claims.
Hjermann told Aftenposten that he’s had to deal with some parents who even want their children to attend two different schools, in order to live part-time with the mother and part-time with the father. He advises strongly against that. He concedes that some children manage to move back and forth between their parents, but he thinks that only works well when the parents live close to one another and cooperate well.
Hjermann’s recommendation against commuting children “disappoints” top Labour Party politician Karita Bekkemellem, who until recently was the government minister in charge of family issues.
“It’s most unfortunate that in 2008, the children’s ombudsman doesn’t equate the positions of mother and father,” she told Aftenposten. She claims that too many fathers feel short-changed, when their wives are all too often granted custody of the children.
Without shared living arrangements, “only one of the parents gets to have close contact with the children in everyday life,” Bekkemellem said. “All our experience shows that it will continue to be the fathers who are discriminated against.”
|
| More from Glenn Sacks

Stumble It!

January 4th, 2008 at 11:56 am
This story shows proof that sometimes men are our own worst enemies, and that some women really do care about healthy father-daughter relationships.
Kudos to Karita Bekkemellem, a politician whom I sincerely wish she was here in the United States…
Thomas Lessman
. http://www.ThomasLessman.com
. http://www.WorldHistoryMaps.info
Blog: http://www.talessman.blogspot.com
Email: talessman@yis.us
January 4th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Don’t they have a Man Tax or is that Sweden?
January 4th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Why would you say that having the kids attend two different school systems is ‘ludicrous’? If the kids are attending two different school systems say an hour away from each other, I don’t see the harm.
School employees love making “special” arrangements for children. It validates that everything is “for the children” without any real hard work.
How much harder is it to coordinate lesson plans with another school compared to keeping copies of ID’s and having approved pickup lists for children that habitually disadvantage fathers.
These people are your servants. They’re supposed to do their best to take care of your special needs for your kids.
January 5th, 2008 at 12:35 am
More suggested interferences and family grave-digging, complete with mendacious ‘gender-neutral’ language. Even ’shared parenting’ swings that way. Oh the lawyers rub their hands with glee.
Look. It isn’t so hard. BOTH parents are jointly and severally, total and wholly responsible for the well being and raising of their children.
Now, hands up anyone who doesn’t understand ?… ok, you three stay behind and I’ll go through that again.
Now…. any who disagree? …. OK you two go through that door. Oh, kiss your arses goodbye.
Vote #1 Amfortas. Keep it cymmple, stupid.
January 21st, 2008 at 11:20 am
This is a picture of the old minister. The new one is Osmundsen and she stated November 23rd 2007 that women are more often violent towards children and that their violence is more dangerous than fathers violence.
It is the Children Ombudsman who made this stupid statement. He is a man. It would be fair for everyone to use pictures of the correct man, and a title that correspond to who actually made the statement.
In Norway we are working to get him fired after this…