Outrageous Entrapment of Men Using Half-Naked Women in Parks
“Take heed, ye red-blooded American males. The police are operating a new sting designed to destroy your life.
“The police are planting attractive women half naked in parks. They entice passing males, engage them in conversation, lay back, spread their legs and rest their feet on the men’s shoulders.
“After being as friendly and suggestive as possible, they ask to see your penis.“Don’t show it to them. You are being filmed by police. If you show your penis, you will be arrested as a pervert. “Only American police, judges, and juries could think that responding to a seductress’s invitation is proof of perversion….No, this is not a joke. It is actually happening. Last May in Berliner Park in Columbus, Ohio, Robin Garrison, a 42-year-old firefighter was lured into arrest by a half naked woman under a tree.
In reporting the story…ABC News describes the above: ‘Topless Woman Lured Perverts in Police Sting.’
“Get that, red-blooded American males. You are a pervert if you show your penis to a woman who is seducing you.”–Paul Craig Roberts, in Criminals With Badges
This incredible ABC story, discussed by Paul Craig Roberts above, details an outrageous assault on men. “Entrapment” is putting it mildly.
I highly recommend readers watch the ABC video of the sting, which can be found here. It’s from something of a distance, but the unfairness and absurdity of this sting comes across very clearly. The woman seems to be very attractive–she’s certainly in shape, she’s topless and very seductive.
She seems to like the guy a lot, at one point putting her leg on his shoulder (as pictured), at another spreading her legs in front of him. All the time topless. OK, I certainly agree that the guy should have said “let’s take this to a hotel room” instead of whipping it out, but he’s hardly a “pervert.” In fact, I think you’d be hard to find many heterosexual males who wouldn’t be turned on by this woman. While watching her I certainly wanted a closer view.
I suppose one could argue the guy should have known better, but that’s hardly a justification for charging him with a crime. It reminds me of a story my dad told me when I was a kid about Ralph Nader during the 1960s (I think). I don’t recall the details, but Nader was pursuing the auto industry for its allegedly unsafe cars and one of the companies decided to hire a woman to spy on him or create other mischief. The woman was very beautiful, and ran in to Nader at a supermarket, and came on to him very strong.
Nader guessed at what was happening and declined her advances. Later someone asked Nader how he knew it was a setup. Nader replied:
“I knew because this doesn’t happen to men.”
One odd thing–the ABC story says “The sunbathing woman is not affiliated with the police department and she was not asked to take part in the sting operation, according to a spokesperson for the department.” Was she simply a conveniently placed free-lance seductress? That seems questionable–anybody know more about it?
Thanks to Tony, a reader, for sending me the story.
|
| More from Glenn Sacks
Stumble It!
January 4th, 2008 at 10:37 am
Let’s see, she’s half naked in a public place and is not charged with indecent exposure. She convinces him to whip it out and he’s charged with doing something she wanted him to do. Hmm.
The test for entrapment is whether the idea originated with him or with her. In this case it obviously originated with her. That’s why the police are claiming she’s not one of them, since a non-cop can’t entrap someone. But she obviously had to agree to be the agent of the police. I mean this didn’t just happen. There were cops there waiting to swoop in, a videographer, etc.
January 4th, 2008 at 11:14 am
I can’t imagine what would induce a police department, given the demands on manpower and resources to devote such an effort to something as silly and liability heavy as this. The Chief of Police should be fired.
January 4th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
The girls down in the sex/domestic violence industry are getting ready to expand, and needed some agit-prop from somewhere.
If they can put enough hysteria out there, by “churning fear”, then missplaced heroes such as Joe Biden can come save the day, with A seemingly endless supply of feminist pork!!
Is Joe Biden A modern day Don Quiote????
January 4th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
feminists have turned our police sations into vehicles to churn out hysteria statistics!!
Self respecting officers should be ashamed of themselves!!
January 4th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Guys my suggestion is that if anything like this happens to you, call the police and report the street walker as accosting you. Beat them at their own game.
January 4th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
… but isnt every aspect of the hatred and illtreatment of males a manifestation of the sentiment of males towards themselves.
A society that revolves around the ideal that male sexuality and identity is a perversion needing correction must experience the worse of it before it gets better.
January 4th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
This is also typical of law enforcement when they have female officers dress up as prostitutes and go out and wait to be solicited for sex by males. Then the MALES get arrested because they responded to a sexually suggestive female undercover officer. Of course, the same departments do all they can to ignore the real prostitutes on the streets…….they would rather arrest the men.
January 4th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Not even safe to go “parking” anymore…geez
January 4th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
Women have the right to lie topless in a park, flirt heavily with a man, caress his earlobe with her toe, and ask him to expose his wiener. If he actually exposes himself then he is a pig. He’s used the sight of his penis (a symbol of the patriarchy) to suppress and intimidate her.
January 4th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Response to #7. “Of course, the same departments do all they can to ignore the real prostitutes on the streets”
I think in the case of u/c cops arresting “Johns” word of mouth and publicity in the papers would lead to “Johns” avoiding that area and the prostitute’s business would dry up or move elsewhere.
January 4th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
I blogged on this a few days ago. How “criminal” and “perverted” is a guy who responds to a half-naked woman after she just spent several minutes bombarding him with sexual signals?
Furthermore, isn’t it solicitation for her to ask him to commit a crime? What about battery–didn’t she caress him with her foot without first gaining permission?
And something smells about the gal who allegedly wasn’t “in” on the entrapment op…I ain’t buying that for a moment. She had to be involved, otherwise the cops should have busted them both…him for indecent exposure (like she wasn’t!), and her for solicitation and battery.
Based on Columbus’ crime stats, the cops would do better to pay attention to more serious crimes, rather than busting lonely guys in the park who succumb to the advances of an attractive woman.
January 4th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
My heavily tattooed and multiply pierced chick cousin is an undercover cop in Austin TX. Her regular beat is to get all tarted up at night and go prowling as “bait,” impersonating a hooker to help vice bust johns in the tourist sector of the city.
She’s very good at what she does and enjoys her work.
What’s really funny is that she is a lesbian!
Now that’s gotta hurt for some poor dude to have to do the perp walk and get cuffed and fingerprinted for coming on to a dyke.
That’s just morally wrong. There oughta be a law…
January 4th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
I guess the moral of this story is:
When a woman advertises herself in a way that could be expected to draw male attention, behaves flirtaciously and seductively, and expresses a sexual interest in a man, then –
— it’s a lie and a trap.
Kind of like marriage, eh?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
sting underway: set up shop (cameras, men, equipment, etc.) and wait and wait and wait for some poor schmuck to show eventually and then get him to expose himself to a random woman so they can get a shaky exposure bust?
if that is true i see why crime does pay so well.
how about this scenario. the cops were videotaping topless women in the park and accidentally came across this guy.
either way… i smells a rat.
January 5th, 2008 at 7:06 am
People still don’t get it. It’s not about men against women. It’s about population control. When you make men afraid to consort with those that can have them thrown in jail on a whim, men tend to avoid those same people. That poor woman is probably having a hell of a time finding some poor sap to enter her marriage web. When she finally gets a “bite” by laying around half naked in a public park, the damn fool cops rush in and arrest him. Yup, they arrested the fly and not the spider. If you think about it, they probably did him a favor in the long run and now this poor female will have to find other reproductive options.. LOL
January 5th, 2008 at 9:11 am
This is what you get when you funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to man-hating feminists – feminist control of the judiciary. They already control family law, and increasingly control criminal law.
The female is allegedly allowed to go topless because males are allowed to go topless, because as the theory goes, anything a man can do a woman should be able to do, although not vice versa. Entrapment is allegedly ok as long as there is some technicality to obfuscate it, as long as only men are being entrapped of course.
You know it’s bad when even ABC news recognizes it as entrapment, although the above links are now dead, possibly because ABC is afraid to cross the feminists.
It is disconcerting to see men react in a way that says, ok, I need to watch out for a new form of criminalizing maleness because now they are obfuscating entrapment just like they did with debtor’s prison, again, so long as it only applies to males. That’s a higher level of entrapment, just getting men to go along with the idea that anything a female does is fine because it’s her choice, while anything a male does can be criminalized.
What should be happening here is that ABC and the rest of the media should not be afraid to report it, the woman should be prosecuted for indecent exposure, and the police in question, and their superiors who put them up to it, should at least be fired if not prosecuted for entrapment. But what will happen instead is that the judiciary will become further entrenched in feminist jurisprudence, while real criminals continue to go free.