<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Feminist Intentional Walk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/09/the-feminist-intentional-walk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/09/the-feminist-intentional-walk/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:49:00 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: daveinga</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/09/the-feminist-intentional-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-57532</link>
		<dc:creator>daveinga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1628#comment-57532</guid>
		<description>&quot;...loonies, misogynists, conspiracy theorists, homophobes, and others who inhabit the nether regions of the fatherhood movement.&quot;  ???

well, that sorta covers all of the &quot;fatherhood movement&quot;, doesn&#039;t it? 

what&#039;s that word? oh yeah.... condescending? 

guess that&#039;s defines what happens to men who have their children stolen from them by honorable, just, fair, equitable, and honest judges out to sustain a corrupt system by destroying marriage and the family. 

is that the conspiracy theory? or the looney part? we have all been called woman haters just by wanting our rights to be fathers to our children. 
guess Am covered the homophobe part. and you &quot;others&quot; know who you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;loonies, misogynists, conspiracy theorists, homophobes, and others who inhabit the nether regions of the fatherhood movement.&#8221;  ???</p>
<p>well, that sorta covers all of the &#8220;fatherhood movement&#8221;, doesn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>what&#8217;s that word? oh yeah&#8230;. condescending? </p>
<p>guess that&#8217;s defines what happens to men who have their children stolen from them by honorable, just, fair, equitable, and honest judges out to sustain a corrupt system by destroying marriage and the family. </p>
<p>is that the conspiracy theory? or the looney part? we have all been called woman haters just by wanting our rights to be fathers to our children.<br />
guess Am covered the homophobe part. and you &#8220;others&#8221; know who you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amfortas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/09/the-feminist-intentional-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-57478</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1628#comment-57478</guid>
		<description>&quot;it was Lenin who said that the proper way to win a political debate is to counter your opponents&#039; best arguments, not their worst.&quot;

But he quickly gave up that patient nonesnse and just got on with shooting people. Not a great example there, Glenn.

&quot;It’s one thing to be respectful of gays and gay parents. It’s quite another to ..&quot; Substitute something else and see what it sounds like.... sodomites, for instance. Why on earth should I be expected to &#039;respect&#039; an arse bandit or a vibrator virtuoso? It is their business of course and nothing to do with me, so why the need to gratuitously &#039;respect&#039; them? Let them Earn respect like everyone else has to.

Of course there are folk with even less tolerance than I have, who do react quite strongly when faced with f*ckweasels like Drexler. And they don&#039;t have the grasp on the measured retort that you have.  Its a plural world and if Ms Drexler can only find comfort in arguing with the seedier chaps, the terse and unimaginative wordsmiths, and chooses to imagine them as her only opposition, so be it.

We have you, Glenn, to take the brunt and deploy a battalion of patience and reason and calmness. And I for one appreciate it. I also appreciate the lessons of Lenins&#039; later work, if not the people he chose to share it with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it was Lenin who said that the proper way to win a political debate is to counter your opponents&#8217; best arguments, not their worst.&#8221;</p>
<p>But he quickly gave up that patient nonesnse and just got on with shooting people. Not a great example there, Glenn.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s one thing to be respectful of gays and gay parents. It’s quite another to ..&#8221; Substitute something else and see what it sounds like&#8230;. sodomites, for instance. Why on earth should I be expected to &#8216;respect&#8217; an arse bandit or a vibrator virtuoso? It is their business of course and nothing to do with me, so why the need to gratuitously &#8216;respect&#8217; them? Let them Earn respect like everyone else has to.</p>
<p>Of course there are folk with even less tolerance than I have, who do react quite strongly when faced with f*ckweasels like Drexler. And they don&#8217;t have the grasp on the measured retort that you have.  Its a plural world and if Ms Drexler can only find comfort in arguing with the seedier chaps, the terse and unimaginative wordsmiths, and chooses to imagine them as her only opposition, so be it.</p>
<p>We have you, Glenn, to take the brunt and deploy a battalion of patience and reason and calmness. And I for one appreciate it. I also appreciate the lessons of Lenins&#8217; later work, if not the people he chose to share it with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
