lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Call to Action! Romney Asks for Cases of Falsely Accused Fathers

2008-01-10
By

“In my state I do not recall a circumstance…where a law of this kind interfered with the rights of a parent in a way that seemed like it was out of keeping, but if you’re familiar with such, let us know.”–Mitt Romney, presidential candidate and governor of Massachusetts, 2003-2007

“The continual use of some men’s groups to spout bogus facts and statistics is a problem we need to correct…[the idea] that men are falsely accused of domestic violence and lose contact with their children unjustly as a result…is not accurate…just the opposite is true.”–Rita Smith, Executive Director, The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence

We’ve often discussed the way restraining/protection orders based on false allegations of domestic violence are frequently used to separate fathers from their children. At a recent New Hampshire gathering, fatherhood activist Richard Smaglick asked presidential candidate Mitt Romney about the problem.

In response, Romney, who was governor of Massachusetts from 2003-2007, said that he could not recall a circumstance where such a thing had occurred, but said, “If you’re familiar with such, let us know.”

We appreciate Romney’s offer, and will take him up on it. If you have had your parental rights interfered with because of a restraining order or a false allegation of domestic violence, please send me your name, phone number, and a brief (100 words max) description of yourself by clicking here. We have a method of getting the letters to Romney.

Since Romney is running for national office, we are looking for people from all over the United States.

Again, if you have had your parental rights interfered with because of a restraining order or a false allegation of domestic violence, click here.

To watch the video of Romney’s response, click here.

To read a Washington Post reporter’s take on it, click here.

To read Rita Smith’s press release criticizing the fatherhood movement, click here. Romney is under fire from Smith and the NCADV because he fumbled Smaglick’s question regarding the Violence Against Women Act.

To learn more about how innocent men are victimized by domestic violence restraining/protection orders and the domestic violence system, see my co-authored column Biden’s Misguided S1515 Will Exacerbate Domestic Violence System’s Problems (Philadelphia Daily News, 12/7/07).

62 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Denis

    Glenn-

    thanks for highlighting this and thanks for soliciting people who can provide proof. Your accomplishments in campaigning against publicly funded television programming that openly lie about husbands and fathers and your accomplishments in affecting the advertisement community and putting them on notice that someone is now watching them in regards to anti-male and anti-father bias have had an impact. I hope you will get compelling proof from readers and succeed in putting these cases on Romney’s desk. The truth about Romney will become apparent if he opens the case files and takes a position in favor of the falsely accused fathers-and promises to act upon this issue if elected.

    Thanks Glenn for being a doer.

  • David R. Usher

    Romney obviously is unwilling to admit or recognize that that VAWA is one giant loophole pretending that, due to lack of evidentiary standards, all allegations of spouse abuse made by a woman are in fact true, justifying “erring” on the side of protecting the child in 100% of DV allegations.

    Saying that errors or abuses is a state issue is the standard neo-conservative brush-off. These guys know damned well that VAWA funding and requirements levied on states is what determines what the states do. No judge will get thrown off the bench for granting 100% of restraining orders without hesitation, because VAWA says that is what he/she should do.

    In the position Romney is, and being a lawyer, he either knows or should have known about this. He should be held responsible accordingly, and staunchly opposed as a candidate until he openly becomes willing to back reforming VAWA to be a sex-neutral “Family Violence Act” that intervenes sensibly and properly.

  • http://www.geocities.com/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    The Washington Post article makes it clear that Romney favors family disruption due to false accusations. He comes right out and says so. Any reasonable person should support basic constitutional rights of parents and therefore oppose Romney holding any government position.

  • foxhole_104th

    Something else I forgot to say and I hope Mitt Romney sees this…My brother called his office in the past about this only to be told to go away.

  • foxhole_104th

    I am from Massachusetts and my younger brother has been through hell because of restraining orders. He has a daughter he has not even met yet is paying child support for. I don’t think the kid is his but the Massachusetts court will not let him get a DNA test. His ex-wife had done the same thing to 3 men including my brother that I know of.

    Massachusetts is the worst state when it comes to father’s rights. I saw it growing up in the 80′s, what my step-father and step-brother went through. It was awful but, my step-father’s ex-wife kept him from seeing his son many times and kept getting more and more child support even though she had a brand new BMW and my step-father was raising 3 kids that were not his own. That’s why we were on welfare growing up. The state took his money away from him forcing us to live off the state.

    I have so much more to say but not enough time. I did e-mail Glenn sacks with my # to contact me. I hope he does.

    http://www.move-off.org
    patriotsofamerica@move-off.org







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search