Change Causes Trouble By Bill Dickerson

2008-01-11
By

Many of the presidential candidates are running on the promise of change. Some are saying they will make more changes than the others.

Is this a good thing? No! Change causes trouble! Think about it. Most of the problems we have today were caused by changes we made in the past.

We changed the tax structure from the graduated income tax to an almost flat tax resulting in a nine trillion dollar national debt that is totally out of control.

We changed our foreign trade policy and went from a trade surplus to a five trillion dollar deficit and the loss of millions of industrial jobs.

We changed our immigration policy and now have twelve to twenty million illegal immigrants in this country and more coming in every day.

We changed our non-aggressive foreign policy and got the disasters of Vietnam and Iraq.

How many more changes can we take before we have to move to Bangladesh to improve our standard of living?

Does this mean that we should never make changes? Of course not. But make them keeping in mind that “change causes trouble” and be prepared to deal with it – something the authors of the above named changes failed to do.

27 views

  • Artfldgr

    How many more changes can we take before we have to move to Bangladesh to improve our standard of living?

    none, the rest is overkill…

  • cybro

    Here is a new change for you. No woman is illegal. Well ok we kind of knew that already. They kill their babys, kids, husbands, boyfriends already. Nothing seems to be illegal about that. The only tragedy was that they became upset and need therapy to help calm them down.

    I suggest inacting your own changes. Remove yourself as far as you can from these unacountable psychos. The Lizard Queen is a serious man hater who will unleash these murdering creatures to new lows of depravity. There will be no such thing as overkill.

  • Gus

    There is one thing that the apostles of change forget: not all change is for the better. Ask anyone over 40.

  • Artfldgr

    they didnt forget… what they are doing is replacing merit with social promotion by other socialists in collusion… in order to do that, you have to remove merit from the equation or else there is justification to remove a persom placed in position by someone who earned their position.

    you stand on a moving surface, while i stand on a platform. your surface is kept in constant change, prevents you or anyone climbing up and knocking me off my platform. and thats it in a nutshell.

    all these changes are in place to prevent the enevitable that is in ecoomic theory… that the oppressed actully do throw off their chains… but theyd ont do it for socialism…

    this is why the people of communist states cant revolt… no property, no supples… inability to communicate… random terror..

    all of it keeps a shifting bottom to prevent wha capitalism allows… movemetn from lower to higher… and movement from higher to lower if they cant compete.

    so the idea is to stop movement upwards, sothat movemetn downwards halts when they are on top.

    veddy simple..






Search