The Huffington Post (colloquially known as the “Ton of Huffing Post”) insulted American intelligence last Friday by publishing a pretzel-logic rant by one Erica Jong, titled “Who’s Tired Of Pink?”.
Fortunately, Ms. Jong speaks only for the few sociopathic women who wouldn’t know what to do with a good man if he fell out of the sky and landed right in her lap.
“Who’s Tired of Pink” is certainly an excellent question in this day of collapsing end-stage radical feminist theory and politics. Therefore, I will now answer this question on behalf of the 99% of recovering feminists in the mainstream, who know that feminism no longer stands for equality, and who are running away from the National Organization for Women in droves.
Who’s Tired of Pink? (The Matter-Of-Fact Mainstream Version)
We are tired of the Pink Feminist Klan and their bought-and-paid for Pink Politicians (of both sexes) telling us that only women are qualified to protect women. We are tired of the Pink Klan controlling our educational systems, law, psychology, and media. We are disgusted by those who insist that worshipping the Vagina Monologues and the Pink Oedipus Complex is a good thing.
We are tired of Pink Warriors of both sexes who converted marriage from a cooperative institution into a war for domination and submission. We are disgusted by those who tell us that marriage is a trap, when we know that it normally provides a much better life for the vast majority of women than anything that the Pink Klan ever accomplished. We are saddened because so many good women bore heavy costs in their personal lives because they were fooled following the Pink Piper down a troubling path that is difficult to get out of.
We are disgusted by those who deny that women are responsible for over half of all serious spousal altercations so they can control family law, child custody, and billions of feminist entitlements from perfume-marinated perches founded on political and scientific treachery. We are horrified that feminists refuse to spend these funds to help women get well so they do not willfully cause or escalate violence that too often leads to injury to women. We are sick of the violations of human rights that occur because so many allegations of abuse and rape are false or completely unsupportable.
We are tired of entitling elective illegitimacy and divorce-for-the-hell-of-it. We can not believe that one-third of women “accidentally” get pregnant out of wedlock when women have the most effective forms of birth control in history of civilization at their sole disposal. We know this happens because federal government has entitled illegitimacy and divorce – enticing women to do things that in the end put them in a position of “having to do it all”, on less money, in cities full of men they rejected in favor of a government check and Kinsey’s idea of perennial sexual liberation.
We are disgusted by movies such as “First Wives Club”, which would have us believe that it is funny for women to torture, extort, and economically abuse men who have done nothing evidently wrong. We are disgusted by television shows where men are commonly portrayed as near-idiots and punching bags for sneering violent women. We are horrified and the American Bar Association, who in conjunction with the APA and courts execute similar forms of organized misandry every day in our courts at the direct expense of marriage and the futures of children.
We are tired of Pink internationalists who export Femocracy in the name of Democracy and then wonder why some countries do not like us. We are tired of being bombed and tired of feminist politics attracting the ire of hyper-masculist radicals who are essentially as insane as their American and European feminist counterparts.
We are tired of Pink Politicians of both sexes wantonly serving men, women, and children up on the smoking platter of radical feminism for political or business profit. We will vote only for those running on pro-social “Marriage Values” changes to social policy and law. We want policies that expect and reward heterosexual marital responsibility, and improve marriage retention rates by helping spouses work through the common problems of marriage and aging when they ask for assistance. We expect legislation to reform discipline of attorneys by commissions operating independently of the state Bar associations. We expect oversight of the American Psychological Association to end the practice of psycho-feminism over that of established scientific knowledge.
We will not vote for any pink politician who plays the “deadbeat dad” card, or insists on passing marriage-negative programs such as nationalized health care for children of mothers who chose to marry Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Republicans who created the Millennium neo-welfare state in the name of “family values”. We will not support or vote for any candidate who refuses to run an aggressive “marriage values” campaign based on wholesome policies restoring heterosexual marriage as the norm in America.
————————————————-
David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network, and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition
Rate this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Stumble It!
NJBeachbum said,
She’s a hater, yes. She hates herself more than any ‘pink man’. She bought into that feminist claptrap 30 years ago, and now there is no turning back!
I don’t wonder what man would ever sleep with her.
January 15, 2008 at 3:59 am
The Vicar said,
What’s next, pink pants?
I wonder about a man who wears pink….
January 15, 2008 at 4:15 am
TheManOnTheStreet said,
Imagine if the sexes were changed? Imagine if the “color” was changed.. The writers head on a plater they would shout!
TMOTS
January 15, 2008 at 7:07 am
PolishKnight said,
The leftist philosophy is based upon blaming white males for all the problems in the world. It’s good old fashioned scapegoating. They hope to keep a coalition of non-white males and white male sell-outs to retain power. They even project their own racism and hatred upon white males even as they rely upon white males to protect and support them.
In all fairness, perhaps she has a point in that as long as there are white males servicing her computer, fixing her plumbing, and keeping the lights on,etc. they present an easy target. If she were to bash Islamicists she knows they’d pay her a visit and shut her up.
I know all along that they were ultra-hypocritical cowards, traitors, liars, and sleezeballs but seeing it in black and white like that was useful. I tell leftist white men that if their wife divorces them, or if they are the victim of a hate crime (which may not be catagorized as a hate crime since leftists don’t think it’s hateful to hate white men), then they deserve it.
This is the situation with Obama and Clinton who both think that they should get the presidency handed to them due to gender and race respectively. Welcome to the thunderdome!
January 15, 2008 at 12:59 pm
shatteredmen said,
I am tired of free this and that’s for women but men have to pay for everything. Oh we are told that PSA exams are not effective but breast cancer screenings are the the going rage.
http://www.shatterdmen.com/prostate%20cancer.htm
Spending in 1997 on research looked something like this: Breast
Cancer $12,800/death, prostate cancer $2,700/death.)
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in
American men. It is curable if diagnosed early. Early detection is
the key.
About 30,000 men will die from it this year alone. Men over 45 don’t
need another excuse to avoid taking care of their health.
But the argument against the use of the prostate specific antigen
blood test for detecting prostate cancer has provided that excuse –
pitting public health officials and primary care physicians, who
claim there is no evidence of PSA success beyond a reasonable doubt,
against many urologists who ask why a 27 percent decline in prostate
cancer mortalities in the past five years isn’t evidence enough
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/05/health/webmd/main1592359.sh
tml
Many women overrate their risk of breast cancer. But many also think
mammograms detect tumors better than they truly do.
Study challenges mammogram effectiveness in breast screening Regular
breast physical and self-examinations are an alternative for women
in their fifties
September 19, 2000 — Annual mammograms do not lower breast cancer
deaths in women aged 50 to 59 who are also receiving professional
breast physical examinations and have training in breast self-
examination, say University of Toronto researchers reporting on the
Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2 (CNBSS).
http://www.news.utoronto.ca/bin1/000919a.asp
I am also tired of hearing about men who have gotten a Pink slip because they have expressed their concern over Pink in various ways such as asking why a female news anchor can joke about castrating men while a man would be sent packing if he so much as insulted women.
I am tired of going through the cereal aisle and seeing boxes of special cereal for women although there are tens of thousands of men who may like cereal but the iron content is literally killing them…..still most cereals are still fortified with…iron.
Isn’t it time to value ALL our people?
January 20, 2008 at 4:53 am
steven deluca said,
January 27, 2008 at 1:07 am