‘I have to pay for 17 years for a kid I will never lay eyes on who may not even be mine’
A recent letter from a reader. As you read it, make sure to remember that the men’s and fathers’ movement is just a bunch of pampered, whiny men who have no real grievances…
“Dear Glenn:
“My girlfriend got pregnant after we had known each other just a few months. I was a 1 in 4 possibility as Dad…She refused to submit DNA when requested by DCSS until just days before a court hearing. I was told if I did not supply DNA that I would be assessed as the father and charged with support. I submitted DNA. DCSS refused to give me full results.
“I only received 11 out of 16 markers as a result. I was assessed as a ‘Presumed Father’ and I am now getting nearly $1000 taken from me via my paycheck each month. DCSS refuses to tell me where the mother or child are or if the child is really mine or even alive. (Child suffered health issues due to mom smoking all through her pregnancy).
“I have no idea where they are. I will have to pay for 17 years for a kid I will never lay eyes on who may not even be mine. No one will help me.
“When I called DCSS to get assistance from the social workers, one told me that I should have ‘Kept it in my pants.’ Another told me, ‘Children belong with their Mothers.’ I kid you not.”
|
| More from Glenn Sacks
Stumble It!
January 20th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
ain’t love a cackle cackle cackle?
i was the same when i was in my twenties. the difference is that women were just starting the control thing and i escaped with minor damage ($35.00 a week for 15 years. not a win for me but a loss i could live with). of course, i am just now getting to know my son. its a little late for sure.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Back when the onus was on mothers (i.e. when mothers had to seek out men for support instead of big daddy government) people often said that women “should have kept their legs shut/crossed”
As a matter of fact that was won of the galvanizing moments of the true feminists the suffragettes. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was fighting for the rights of a woman who had a newborn with a dad who left her in the lurch.
For whatever reason this woman had no help or family. She was forced to go to work, and the child died while she was at work. This was in the gr8 depression era. This woman was sentenced to death.
Obviously it isn’t a solution or justice to say blame a person’s libido for harsh governmental injustices. But everybody agrees that when we tell a woman “you should have kept your legs crossed” it’s too harsh.
But when the same is told to a man, we are met with an audience that says “f**king A!”
These are beer-swilling football watching dumbasses from we are drawn. The truth (I’m sure) is that very few of us cared about these issues until they befell us.
That is why there needs to be a galvanizing statement to garner attention, then when we get the air time you can mediate this bold statement.
Something like – single mothers equal child death would be good. Or end mothers who kill their children.
AFTER you get air time you can go onto say that you’re fighting for two-parent families and that in the event of a breakup both parents need to be involved.
Any idiot who thinks for a second and reflects on the millions of people who have non-diagnosed mental disorders will realize that allowing the state to leave the children (post divorce) in the hands of one parent is insane.
January 21st, 2008 at 7:32 am
Usually where there are more than 2 or 3 Loci differences, the alleged is excluded…. Sounds like you are getting played… Demand a new test.
FYI:
http://vita-med.com/feature_details.cfm?id=01Jan02
TMOTS