lumigan tramadol tadalafil

The resonance of Carrie, Part 1: The teased teenager

2008-01-28
By

Stephen King’s first published novel, Carrie, a book that launched his career as a horror writer extraordinaire, has recently been re-issued with a new introduction by King himself.

What was it that made Carrie such a hit? Certainly it is an exciting tale told in a taut style. However, I think what makes this story so very strong is that is strikes a powerful emotional chord for two major reasons. The first is that it captures so perfectly and poignantly the feelings of an ostracized teenager. (The other reason for its emotional resonance is the depiction of Carrie’s religiously fanatic and sexually repressive mother but that will be discussed in a future blog.)

Childhood can be an ordeal for the child who just doesn’t fit in. There are innumerable reasons why some kids stick out as King’s fictional Carrie does. I have read that children who are bullied are often “those who are different in weight, ethnicity, or clothing” from the average that is around them. I have also read that the inability of some people to be able to read and respond to the non-verbal cues of facial expression, body language, and vocal tone, a deficit that is probably genetic in origin, is a large contributing factor to the creation of the pariah child. (I believe I suffer from this problem).

While some children are perpetually bullied, all children are teased and tormented by their peers at some time or other. What’s more, almost every child acts as a bully at least sometimes.

Thus, the story of Carrie touches a responsive chord in almost everyone although it has a special resonance for those, such as myself, who were the frequent targets of childhood taunts.

What’s more, people may feel an uneasy identification with Carrie’s tormentors and that identification helps to draw them into the story. Almost every child has teased and enjoyed a sadistic pleasure out of it as well as a smug sense of security in being with the superior – because normal – crowd.

Of course, Carrie is not about teasing among small children but that among teenagers. High school can be an especially brutal time for the disliked kid as it is the period in which sexuality begins to bloom and popularity takes on an overwhelming importance.

I don’t want to spoil Carrie for anyone who has not yet read the novel or seen the film. However, for the purposes of this essay I must state that the worst harassment of Carrie takes place in a girls’ locker room when other females set upon the hapless Carrie in a very cruel manner.

Sometimes we can make so much of gender differences that we ignore the truth that most negatives – and positives – are common to us as human beings. In at least some cases, gender does not influence the behavior as much as it does the explanations for that behavior. Girls who harass may be called catty and boys who harass may be said to be aggressive. The truth is that the tendency to target those who seem odd is a quintessentially human failing and the terror of being so targeted a quintessentially human fear.

33 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Artfldgr

    Lucas is a another movie that shows how this dynamic plays out. rather than it being the simplefied way that the left wishes it to be seen, so that a simple sweeping non solution can be created, its actually more nuanced. the jocs do try to protect their status, but a few, one in particular, shows that a leader also maintains status while doing the right thing (vs the guy that gets them to be with him because he enables their stupidity).

    it also shows that children have secret relationships as a means of getting arond things.

    adn to add a tiny smidgeon to amfortas great post:

    carries mom was a lunatic, single mother, with zealotrous and ideological view of the world.

    so things acually are resonating on many levels. and its that ability to tap into that, and cause resonance without exposing the details that makes a very entertaining author (who can be considred great for that, but is not necessarily a great author, since many great works are not purely entertainment)

    such resonance is what made and makes movies like rocky horror and shock treatment stick and resonate (to give the bag, frankfurter is the head of the franfrut school. the transexual translvanians are others ‘intellectuals’ promoting the franfurt schools social expermentn of desensitization and behavior modifivation and normalization. and they are doing it symbolically to brad and janet, the white protestant main group that represents the west. shock treatment is the same thing but stage two, where it leads to the assumption of men as incompetent and drugged (brad in a straighjacket incapable of everythign), others dictating how we should live… the tv being reality more than reality.. and janet, the quintesential slutty feminist that sings the me of me! i should write the whole thing up, and point out richard obriens abstracting. but i dont know if others are interested)

    anyway… carrie resonates bevause its the same child fantasy that spans the whole genre of super powers and reasons to have them. after all, what did the super powers of harry potter do? did they make a better world, did they fix the pain? no, for the most part, it took a geeky kid that would be the brunt of some stuff, and make him able to handle the stuff and win, because of MAGIC ability not being equal to other magics. (this moves compariotive advantage into fantasy)

    ah well.. its all interesting.. no?

  • amfortas

    I felt for Carrie. I never read the book but saw the film. (Awful film!). Yes, despite the propensity to bully others that many young people have and most of us learn to overcome by our teens, some raise it to an art-form and give it euphemistic names like ‘communication skills’.

    Most chaps will see Carrie with some desire to cuddle her and say ‘there, there’. She, like so many teens, are pathetic and need all the help and pathos they can engender. The ‘protective’ sensitivity is sparked.

    Her mum was a monster. She too was a teen girl once and learned her communication skills well. Unlike most women, she didn’t have a captive husband around to torture on a daily basis, so Carrie had to substitute. Is that an underlying theme, I wonder. Maybe a revised book is on order. Will we see more of this as more and more single mothers raise children – of either sex – and torture them simply because they are handy and there isn’t a handy man around.

    Note too that the only person to really befriend her, at some cost to his own reputation and standing – equally important to a gangly boy as to a girl – was a boy. A reasonably ordinary boy. The architypal ordinary good lad. Initially conned into it, he came to like Carrie in a teen-genuine way. He had a modicum of empathy and a movement toward looking into her interior with affectionate wonder. Not that it did him any good. His star performance at the final Graduation Ball didn’t cover him in glory – he got a substantial share of the gory.

    Someone else said it on MND recently – well put too – but I cannot recall who. Discussing female harassment and psychological murder: -

    “Destroying a person’s reputation is a very common passive-aggressive tactic that girls learn how to use fairly early in life, and typically it starts during their adolescent “girlfriend wars” when they employ it against their rival females.

    Starting rumors, social ostracism, shunning, shaming, using friendship as a weapon, getting a third party to do your dirty work, making false accusations — these are all tools in the psychological arsenal — which are refined and perfected to be used later on in relationship wars with men.

    The genius of this kind of emotional terrorism is that the perpetrator can always claim innocence, being uninvolved or being misunderstood, yet the predatory power-and-control aims are achieved.

    Corporate sexual harassment policies are a good example of the psychological coercion of big-girl culture built on the ever-present threats of innuendo and hearsay.

    The best read on this subject is Rachel Simmon’s ‘Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls.’

    Of course, it goes without saying that not all women are like this; however, they all know the tricks of the trade and have the capacity to use them if necessary.”

    I wish, sometimes, I had Carrie’s powers!

  • Artfldgr

    I dont think we ignore it. we rewrap it. we make it funny, or silly, or we put it behind doors and then pretend it isnt there.

    in this way a movie like HEATHERS, or several others can show this behaivor, and because its really pretty young women, we cant take a step back and think about what we are finding to be entertainment.

    if we could ignore it then, we wouldnt remember it now, or when we read the book… by definition, ignore does not mean pretend to ignore.

    and gender DOES influence the behavior more. men tend to air things in the open. in the most primiitve its fighting. however their incidents are usually done when done. in this way, its not that uncommon for two who were fighting, to end up being friends.

    but girls/women? nope, that behavior wasnt really seen till today where women are trying to be small poor copies of men reflecting mens more negative qualities.

    girls attack the mind, not the body. the old darwin saw means that they need a differnt field for most of their fighting. so htey fight in political collusions, smears, hurtful language, going after sore spots, kitchen sinking, etc. whipsaw mindf**k comes to mind. or they get ‘authority’ to meet out punishment throuhg manipulating authority. to this there are a whole bunch of tactics…

    when i was little sis knew them, and i was older. she played my parents like a fiddle. except mom and dad said it didnt add up, and so watched things closer. she wasnt an angel, she had already figured out how to manipulate the adults and set up others to get her way. and she wasnt even 5 yet.

    she knew where the sympathies lied. the extra burden of age. the snap judgments adults would make. she even knew to use the fairness respons of kids get me to act right on cue.

    mom and dad were smarter, so things smoothed out…

    so there ARE very different ways that genders go about things. many things that work for one, will not work for another.

    for instance, even if a cop is gay, my opening my shirt and fondling my chest will not get me out of a speeding ticket. care to do a online survey and ask women to tell their stories?

    all kids pick on other kids. we generally opt for the primitive ways of action and manipulation… parents and such are supposed to teach us about being empathetic, and give us better tools to deal with each other in the world.

    as far as your ending statment… its way off…

    dont you think that its quite interesting that now that there is no god, we can find nothing but fault in everything? that we look at our behaivores and think ourselves smug and superior, and then claim that some other quality, which we dont understand, have no context for and propably havent even contemplated, is some sorry failing of nature.

    hows that?

    the tendency to target those that are odd is a VERY important survival instinct. strangers are odd, mom and dad and family dont seem odd. but to others they are odd.

    would you love to automatically trust a sociopath? how bout a con artist? in the land of the blind the one eyed man is king, and so eveyrone that trusted the way you imagine.. all died out.. as you woud if you actually tried to live the way your thinking.

    what your missing is the development of personalities, and heirarchies and those are not things that are negative. we cant function without them. they are fundemental to multiplying our abilities through creating order and function out of a system that can never balance.

    we target odd, because if we didnt, and everyone trusted, the first sociopath that came along would work the whole system to everyones demise.

    if someone is different… say a hominid that walks upright… they force that person to test the change… if the change is bette,r they are higher on the heirarchy and our genes then follow (which is why taking from the better skilled the smarter, etc and giving to the lesser skilled and so forth, will be a bad thing as it will breed out the very spark of progress inventivenes, etc)

    all these ways to act are ways in which we as adults have to deal with the world. we need to know that there are vicious people out there. that there ARE people out there that will hurt us no matter how nice we are to them. we need to know that there are people that will trick us. and on and on.

    in childhood, those lessons do the least amount of harm… and the lessons end up protecting us later. which is why sheltered people cant function outside of their small ponds. they are missing quintisential human failings that would allow them to function in a general way everywhere. they tend to be victims as adults, rather than teased as children.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search