You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know

2008-02-13
By

“About the capitalist states, it doesn’t depend on you whether or not we exist… Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!”

-          Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, 1956

I considered titling this column “Where Are We Going and How Did I Get in This Handbasket?” but decided it would have been a bit unwieldy.

The term “Bolshevik” was derived from a Russian word that means “majority;” the party which bore this name went on – after some good old-fashioned 18th-Century style party warfare – to form the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R) and rule Russia and eastern Europe with a titanium fist for nearly a century.

Two things come to mind: One, that our society has become one which by design promotes the “forgetting of history” (as the saying goes), and two, that Khrushchev’s threat definitely takes on new meaning if one considers it as extending beyond the former U.S.S.R to include all with like philosophy and goals, past, present and future.

While the media (and therefore much of the nation) is fixated on the Svengali-like charismatic power of Democrat presidential contender Barack Obama and the death-struggle between the geriatric liberal senator John McCain and Mike Huckabee on the Republican side, reality continues to unfold in the real world.

“There’s just no doubt in my mind — under any set of rules — waterboarding is torture… One of America’s greatest strengths is the soft power of our value system and how we treat prisoners of war, and we don’t torture”

-          Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge Says Waterboarding is Torture, Associated Press, January 18, 2008

A false premise to start with, of course. For better or worse, informed Americans are well aware that questionable things have been done and practices undertaken throughout our history in order to preserve the nation. Is it nationalistic to declare that this is acceptable as long as it does not include violation of individual Americans’ Constitutional rights? Probably.

Do I have a problem with that? No way.

Had I hair, I’d likely want to tear it out at the former Homeland Security Secretary’s comments. Yes, “soft” is what we have become; Ridge’s use of the phrase “soft power” is not only an oxymoron, but it is intellectually dishonest, intellectually insulting and politically dangerous. A more accurate description of America’s practices concerning prisoners of war, spies and the like might better be viewed as “circumspect power.” For a person who once held Ridge’s position to publically reinforce the twisted geopolitical initiatives that the far left has used to reduce so many Americans and American politicians to rationally yielding larva is inexcusable.

Onto the stage set by the War on Terror, a president who has been more savagely maligned by the establishment media that anyone in history save Adolph Hitler (but who has also been vacillating and ideologically weak in key areas), a Republican party in identity crisis and a voting public that is incomprehensibly ill-informed as regards the machinations and objectives of the far left strides Barack Obama.

Obama speaks of change. What kind? We don’t really know; he’s saying what many presidential hopefuls have said over the years, but he’s saying it very well.

There’s a saying: “You don’t know what you don’t know… until you do.” I am reminded of the disenfranchised Russian masses who heard Lenin’s pretty words and fell for the Bolshevik con; they wanted change too, and wound up with a different master than the Czar – but a much crueler and ruthless one.

Barack Obama’s associations include ties to far left billionaire George Soros and others who claim solidarity with the Nation of Islam. Most Obama supporters are likely unaware of this or do not recognize the grave danger of these facts.

Bill Clinton proved how much one President could damage America culturally. Now, unfortunately, we are also in the crosshairs of enemies against whom the Democrats are by their own words not prepared to stand. They’ve minimized the threat and undermined efforts against our enemies, even to the extent of maintaining that this drama was somehow written, produced and directed by George W. Bush.

Now, Americans want “change,” and they are gobbling up empty rhetoric at a time when we can least afford it.

As with the teenager who thinks they have it all figured out, we adults can only fear for their peril – and, in this instance, the peril of us all.

5 views

  • wtexas

    All things considered, Obama instills hope for a better future. Don’t underestimate hope, psychologically it spurs people to exert themselves to try to bring about a better future. I voted for G.Bush and he turned out to be an uttur and complete disappointment, a RINO. I’m of the argument of Ann Coulter: better to have a known Dem than McCain (RINO), because for certain the Republicans will oppose many of his policies, whereas McCain, ostensibly a Republican, will get less opposition from the Repub’s in the Congress and Senate as he pushes his liberal policies on us.

  • PolishKnight

    Let’s give Bill Clinton his due and criticize the Gipper

    For all the talk about how horrible Bill Clinton was (in the above case, to culture) I fail to see how this was due to his official actions as president.

    On the contrary, most of the damage occurred during the REAGAN presidency when affirmative action was being enforced all during his administration. He could have mitigated that with a simple presidential order: No reverse discrimination. He might have gotten a call from the supreme court, but he could used the justice department’s infinite resources to battle it out. In addition, he could have used the department of education cabinet to deal with this issue.

    He didn’t. Although he did make some strong statements about it.

    In addition, Ronald Reagan, that’s right the Gipper nominated Sandra Day O’Conner, Justice Quota, to the court. She only just retired recently.

    During the 80′s, I remember a distinct change in the tone of mainstream women from either being traditionalists _or_ feminists into a blend of the two of female supremacy. These were the fox feminists: Women who were out to make money the old fashioned way: at any cost. They wanted to get quota jobs in the workplace AND marry up and they quickly learned to play the victim card and train men to become lapdogs. This included REPUBLICAN women. Marriage rates PLUMMETED and it didn’t become clear until the 90′s at how middle and upper class career women were becoming spinsters and bastard child unwed mothers. But the beginning of it all was during the 1980′s and those Joan Crawford shoulder pad dresses that had b*tch written all over them!

    It’s well known that Ronald Reagan implimented welfare reform in the state of California that cut off families with a father under work requirements in addition to increasing benefits for recipients. It was like putting gasoline on the fire. He not only never fixed this, but he also did nothing about the harsh family court system in California.

    Lesson learned: The Republican party is now having an identity crisis (just as the Democrats are). We have to get the evangelicals to appreciate the value of men as fathers just as they care about abortion and gay marriage. In addition, moderate republicans who love the idea of soft socialism with a republican FDA label of safe for consumption have to be given a choice: stay in a party of conservatism OR go to the democrats. That’s a difficult choice for everyone, but the way things are going the country is sliding leftward again.

    Obama, like the Clintons, will probably be mired in scandal from day one and most likely will make grandiose proposals and watch them flop as voters care about more immediate things. They aren’t going to want to have their taxes doubled for national healthcare as they worry about losing their homes. They also won’t be too hip on giving illegal immigrants welfare and free college education while they are working long hours to pay the bills (I guess we could give all the former mortgage brokers jobs picking lettuce to pay for the newly legal immigrants living on welfare.)

    It’s judgement day, baby.

  • amfortas

    The whole western world has been taken down the garden path and pushed into the old weedy pond at the bottom by a succession of American Presidents who couldn’t, or wouldn’t, see the consequences of their own hubris. And no-one outside of America was given any say.

    Out here in the World – yes there is a world out there Virginia – we are fed a diet of American-grown TV garbage about the current crop of wannabees all of whom represent the multitude of hubristic strands, the narcissisms of America. And we cringe. We peek between fingers that cover our faces, watching in utter disbelief at the parade of mendacity and downright confidence trickery. The candidates are all so weak and pathetic. Not even a sign of what Martin King sought. Not only no Character, but a studied ignoring of character. They are Disney cartoons.

    The various nations and peoples of the wide world have been making a mess of their collective lives since Ur created the first State. But at least they were confined. America thinks it has suzerainty over the entire planet and maybe the experience of the modern mileu confirms it. Never before has there been a mechanism for such reach.

    With such a Power to affect how Humanity is to proceed, America proves over and over that it has not only failed to gain the maturity necessary for leadership but revels in the bigotry so easily developed along any of the old cracks of the Human Fault-lines one cares to see and the new, modern, up-to-date strain of human indignity that is Feminism.

    But even without the maturity and with the evil of Feminism, America is de facto the world’s leader. The ducking stool awaits at the bottom of the garden and whichever of the clods on the ‘Primaries’ hustings that eventually get their dirty, sticky hands on the lever is going to shove a hell of a lot of heads under the water.

    The Fall of the American Empire is immanent. It has blown its chance.






Search