Steve Farrell
Compromising the Conservative Movement

by Diane Alden

The conservative movement compromised the day Ronald Reagan appointed George H.W. Bush his VP.

That decision allowed the Rockefeller/Dole/Ford/Bush wing of the Republican establishment to steer the party towards the big government left. It was a decision based on pragmatism, compromise, and “unity” at any cost.

This was the same Ronald Reagan who was vilified, laughed at, and marginalized by the Rockefeller wing of the Republican establishment. Whatever the reason for his decision, ultimately it meant conservatism would be defined by the left-wing press and abused by the big government wing of the GOP.

Ann Coulter refers to this wing as the “loser wing.” She is right. The only way this bunch wins is when they run left in a blue state or hide behind conservative rhetoric and agenda in the national election.

Recently, a shill for the Republican establishment blamed the 1992 loss of George H.W. Bush and the 1996 Bob Dole disaster on conservatives. Take it to the bank, that same establishment is going to hang McCain’s flameout in November on conservatives as well. Conservatives can do nothing right — so to speak, at least for the Republican establishment.

They want conservatives to sell their books or promote their agenda and tell them someday conservative goals will happen. When in power they promote “moderate” candidates over conservatives as George W. Bush has done time and time again. I wish conservatives would understand this and make the break before they become more insignificant to the establishment than they already are.

In 2008, many principled conservatives are standing their ground.

No more compromise on principle because there are so few conservative principles the establishment believes in. Conservatism as a political movement was hijacked and real conservatives for at least a decade read out of the party. An example of what the establishment thinks of conservatives comes from former member of George H.W. Bush’s administration, Bill Bennett.

On CNN, he referred to conservatives who can’t swallow McCain, as akin to “Trotskyites.” Nice going Bill, next time you want to sell a ghost written book let us know. Rush Limbaugh mentioned this episode on his radio show last week. It is one of numerous insults the Republican establishment is hurling at conservatives.

Conservatives involved in the illegal immigrant problem have felt the wrath of the Republican establishment for some time. Presently that wrath is spilling over onto anyone who won’t back McCain. Heaping coals on conservatives are Warren Rudman, Michael Medved, Phil Gramm, Rick Perry, Bill Kristol, Fred Barnes, Wall Street Journal editorial board, Trent Lott, Lindsey Graham — you get the idea.

They appear incensed that conservatives in and out of the media are no longer willing to carry Republican establishment water regardless of how deadly to this nation or which senseless big government Republican they back.

Where do conservatives stand in the Republican Party?

Writer/commentator Selwyn Duke has an insightful take on that topic.

“Some liberals know that the best way to ensure constant movement toward the left is by portraying the status quo as dangerously far right. If you repeatedly warn that we teeter on the brink of rightist hegemony, people will assume that to achieve ‘balance’ we must tack further left toward your mythical center.

“Then we have conservatives influenced by the natural desire to view the world as the happy place they’d like to inhabit. Ingenuous sorts, they confuse Republican with conservative, party with principles, and electoral wars with the cultural one.”

The left often refers to conservatives as racist, protectionist, isolationist, xenophobic, fascist right winger, hater, divisive, sexist, extremists, kooks, conspiracy buffs, etc. These words have been used so often by the left they no longer have meaning. Conservatives should have expected the establishment wing of the Republicans would attempt to denigrate and marginalize principled conservatives using those same insults.

Those involved in illegal immigration fight have felt the sting of those words for years.

To some extent, the only respite for conservatism and conservatives was in the Reagan years. The breathing space peaked in the conservative driven Republican revolution of 1994. Unfortunately, the advancement of conservatism was stopped in the U.S. Senate. Unlike the House, Senate Republicans invariably are about compromise no matter how awful — forget the conservative agenda they made sure it was never going to happen because their power came before principle.

Along with the Republicans in the US Senate whatever good conservatives accomplished over the decades was almost totally undone when George W. Bush came to power. National security was his issue. Nonetheless he left the southern border open as millions of Third World poor and others invaded with no real effort to stop them.

Any thinking American understands George W. Bush, like his predecessor, was more into living up to state sponsored charity than national security. Worse, he sent American troops thousands of miles away to fight a war on terror while buckling to the desires of a corrupt Mexican establishment and unthinking business interests.

The appalling “big tent” Republican Party is a nod to the leftwing fantasy favoring mediocrity, compromise above principle, and national suicide. For the ‘powers-that-be’ compromise is only to be practiced by conservatives giving up principle to advance the big government agenda of the left and the Rockefeller/Bush/McCain establishment. Conservatives have spent years watching as members of the Rockefeller establishment ‘compromise’ principle.

This wing of the party in cahoots with the left grew government faster than LBJ. The conservative media only paid modest attention rationalizing it as ‘taking an issue away from democrats. That is over now.

Finally, it is time to end conservatism’s deification of Ronald Reagan. The establishment captured his name imposing their agenda and goals using it to fool good people. Party before principle is not acceptable if conservatives want to keep conservatism relevant and the United States strong and secure.

Conservatives, therefore, must ask whether or not Ronald Reagan would remain a prisoner of the Republican Party in this era or be a real maverick and put conservatism and America first.

My belief is that if he were alive today he would tell conservatives to move on. He might even tell them to become revolutionaries and retake the United States and protect it from the destructive instincts of his own party. Above all I think he would tell us in our own era — be American first, last, and always.

Stiff Right Jab contributor Diane Alden is a pundit with America’s News Page, NewsMax.com


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 0 views | Other posts by Steve Farrell

Stumble It!

book mark Compromising the Conservative Movement in del.icio.us | Compromising the Conservative Movement to Slashdot.com | Submit Compromising the Conservative Movement to Digg.com | Submit Compromising the Conservative Movement to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement in Furl | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement in Spurl | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement in Reddit | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement in Tailrank | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement in Newsvine | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement to Yahoo! | Bookmark Compromising the Conservative Movement to Fark

3 Comments »

  1. Denis said,

    The future guarantees more disillusionment for Americans-not only conservatives. Everyone.

    John McCain is too stupid-too arrogant in his beliefs-to listen to others who do not tell him what he already believes. He has no capacity to grow anymore and to learn-he’s an old man. With what he has been through he has the body of a man 10 years older than his chronological age. He should have learned something from the recent New York Times hit piece against him. The lesson he should have learned is that conservatives are the only true friends he could have. He thought he knew the MSM. He thought he had insiders on his side in the MSM. He was wrong. Too bad he hasn’t learned. Conservatives could be there for him, when he needs them, if he was there for them, when they need him. That ain’t gonna happen. He has stuck his thumb in the eyes of conservatives for too long. It’s payback time.

    Hillary would be very bad for America. Especially men and fathers. She is vile. She has great appeal to American women. Especially white women. Poor, middle class, and well off white women-single and married. Big surprise there.

    Obama will be bad news for America. Half of America won’t vote for him. Not because he is half Black. No, because he is the most liberal Senator on record. He is an Evangelist. When he becomes President the half of America that voted for him will be looking for the same magic they felt when he campaigned. He will have to deliver his magic as President. He will fall short-far short. The half that did’nt vote for him will have their fangs at the ready. The message that can be taken from Obama’s campaign is that many American’s are disillusioned by what is happening to America-and what is happening to their own lives.

    They will be disappointed.

    American’s are in for a very disappointing next 4 years.

    February 25, 2008 at 7:58 pm

  2. PolishKnight said,

    It’s funny, but Denis… do you miss Bill Clinton?

    Granted, he was a sleazy evil snake, but he really didn’t get a lot done and at least whatever bad he did wasn’t branded as a Republican agenda like GW has done with big government spending and amnesty programs.

    So… stay with me here: I don’t fear the reaper. I don’t fear Obama or even Hillary. GW has shown us hell and misery and insults and epithets from the likes of Bennett or comparisons to Reagan are not going to frighten me to the polls. Do you feel that way?

    So I wonder… will we see 8 months of the Rockefellers and apologists out there sending a dual message of pretending to appeal to conservatives while at the same time belittling them? This is more or less the same message they’ve been sending for decades but the volume is set to 11 now. Should be fun to watch.

    At the same time… we’ll watch a cocky Obama tear down poor Hillary. Then… he’ll start trying to make a more substantive compaign against a moderate Democrat (McCain) and reveal himself as more than a liberal. I think he’s an outright marxist. He’ll terrify wall street.

    All this before summer.

    February 26, 2008 at 5:21 pm

  3. Denis said,

    This election brings me much entertainment. Hearing Hillary whine, hearing Dee Dee Myers whine, hearing Cokie Roberts whine, and hearing many other white American whine, and seeing the Democrats attack each other, and knowing that Jesse Jackson’s and Al Sharpton’s message of Black exclusion has been undermined severely-all of these make my day. Women we have seen, can no longer muster national political clout as they once did. Hillary will have to be more than simply the first woman running for the Presidency, and more than a victim. All these things make me smile.

    I too do not fear for the future. I can live with whoever gets in.

    I don’t miss Bill Clinton. But knowing that he is steaming as he watches his world closing in is also a source of great happiness.

    I hope that the era of the Clinton’s is forever over (but won’t be surprised by a resurfacing HRC 4/8 years from now).

    And I hope soon that the Bush era is forever over.

    Good Riddance.

    February 26, 2008 at 8:01 pm

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MND Opinion
Glenn Sacks on men and the world they inhabit Dr. Helen Smith on psychology, family, sex, and metropolis Bernard Chapin: political commentary, men and women Marc H. Rudov on men and women Marty Nemko: men's issues social critic, radio host, columnist Professor Stephen Baskerville on fatherhood and family in America David R. Usher on the gender wars Warner Todd Huston on politics and current events Denise Noe on women, crime, history, and society Carey Roberts on political correctness Jim Kouri: Crime and Security Zvakwana: on Africa and Zimbabwe Dr. Robert Wascher on health and medicine Blogwonks Humorist Doug Powers on society Roger F. Gay on politics and technology, robotics
editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter
RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
counter