lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Does Hallelujah, I’m a Bum prefigure the beliefs of Ronald Reagan and George Gilder?

2008-02-25
By

Does Hallelujah, I’m a Bum prefigure the beliefs of Ronald Reagan and George Gilder?

Released in 1933 and directed by Lewis Milestone, Hallelujah I’m a Bum is a well-crafted musical comedy set in the time period in which it was made. The legendary Al Jolson plays a happy-go-lucky hobo named Bumper living with a bunch of hobos in New York City’s Central Park. Bumper has been nicknamed the Mayor of Central Park by his fellow homeless. He appears content to go around in ragged and soiled clothes while leading an aimless life of casual adventuring.

Bumper has made the acquaintance of New York City’s Mayor John Hastings (Frank Morgan), who likes the shiftless hobo but believes he needs reforming, i.e. ought to get a job and live like ordinary folks with a roof over his head and clean clothing. However, Bumper prefers the life he already has.

Enter June Marcher (Madge Evans). Pretty, sweet, lithe, charming June. Bumper is smitten and determines to become a man whom she can view as a suitable suitor. For reasons I can’t explain without giving away too much of the plot – and I don’t want to spoil this delightful movie for those who have not yet had the pleasure of watching it – he must also, at least temporarily, contribute to the lady’s support.

The above leads Bumper to see the light and decide to get and keep a job. This decision does not sit well with his fellow hobos who form a self-described kangaroo court and call it the People of the Park vs. Bumper’s Going to Work. They soon conclude that Bumper has gone insane and allow him on his way.

That way is one of conscientiously working at a nine-to-five, being regularly cleaned up, and well dressed.

In some respects, Hallelujah I’m a Bum appears to champion the beliefs of major figures who would come to fame – at least political fame – decades after the film was made. Conservative Republican President Ronald Reagan spoke of those who are “homeless by choice.” The homeless of Hallelujah I’m a Bum appear to have made just that choice. They are quite happy to be living without roofs over their heads. They seem to be carefree and averse to work.

The movie also appears to anticipate the views of social conservative George Gilder. In his 1973 book Sexual Suicide, later revised and reissued as Men and Marriage, Gilder put forth the view that marriage to women civilizes the male sex drive and constructively channels men’s potentially destructive aggressive urges. The bums of the movie are unmarried as well as unemployed. The movie suggests that the desire for the love of a good woman is all that they need to lead them to clean themselves up, get jobs, and become good citizens.

Indeed, Hallelujah I’m a Bum may have taken the position that the homeless are vagrants by choice because the reality – that many if not most of them could not support themselves no matter how hard they try – was too painful for its Depression era audience. Many people went to the theater in order to escape from the gritty truth, not to be reminded of it. As musical comedies often do, Hallelujah I’m a Bum presented an invitingly dreamlike world.

While Hallelujah I’m a Bum is not intended to be realistic there is at least one sense in which it reflects the reality of life in the early 20th Century when it was released, the reality of life in our own 21st Century, and what appears to have been a reality throughout human history: those at the bottom, like those at the top, tend to be men. There is an exception among the park people named Apple Mary (Dorothea Wolbert) but she is a token woman among an overwhelmingly male population.

The film may also reflect the reality that, to the extent that homelessness IS a choice, it is one unlikely to be made by females. The reasons for this are not due to a sexist conspiracy, whether patriarchal or matriarchal, but to certain biological realities for which no human is to blame. Females get pregnant and give birth. It is extremely hard to adopt a vagabond’s carefree life of riding the rails or sleeping out in the open when one is pregnant or in labor. Giving birth usually means caring for newborns and it is unlikely that babies will flourish if they are cared for out in the open. Another factor that would dissuade girls and women from choosing the hobo’s life is that the way male and female genitals are constructed makes us especially vulnerable to rape. However, it should be noted that male homosexual rape is a reality among the homeless – and a horrible, life-scarring reality.

While people who choose to be homeless are indeed likely to be male, it is also true that relatively few of the homeless are the sort of devil-may-care hobos who populate Hallelujah I’m a Bum. People frequently become homeless because their labor is inadequate for self-support. Women of whom this is true usually receive enough aid through either public or private sources to put roofs over their heads; men do not. The truth that men are so disproportionately likely to crash through the social glass cellar should be a top concern for people who care about men.

63 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Oscar Jubis

    Denise,
    I am a film critic intending to become a film studies professor. I am currently in the process of writing a long, in-depth essay on [i]Hallelujah I’m a Bum[/i]. I commend you for recognizing the film as being important and “delightful”. However, it would appear that your reading of the film is rather superficial.

    HIAB proposes that the life of voluntary simplicity preferred by Bunker and his “son” Acorn is a viable alternative, to the more-is-better pursuit of comfort and luxury of the capitalist Mayor Hastings and the stifling dogma of the communist street sweeper Egghead. There’s no indication that the other denizens of Central Park have chosen this lifestyle. Bunker as the informal “mayor of Central Park” advocates on their behalf. The film manages to do what other so-called Depression musicals failed to achieve: to depict the reality of a tough economic climate (unemployment was at 25% when the film was released) while maintaining the musical genre’s characteristic joy,humor and optimism.It’s very important for the viewer to pay attention to the lyrics of the songs. The songs “Bunker found a Grand” and “What do you Want with Money” are particularly useful in understanding how life within the mainstream of society has clear disadvantages (at least during the Depression) and that a simple lifestyle, closer to nature and the spirit of freedom is enviable in many respects. HIAB is very close in spirit to one of the great works of American literature: Thoreau’s Walden. This notion is key to any understanding of what director Lewis Milestone was attempting to express in the film.

  • fourthwire

    “(Denise) Men have always been the vast majority of the homeless and that would seem to reflect a matriarchal tradition. That tradition has always provided greater protections for women in desperate straits than for men similarly situated.”

    fourthwire: Men have always been the vast majority of the homeless because they have been considered EXPENDABLE, which has nothing to do with matriarchal tradition, Denise.

    In fact, women have enjoyed greater protections well beyond those women “in desperate straits”, historically and currently.

    Denise: “fourthwire, I don’t believe that very many people, whether male or female, choose to be homeless.”

    fourthwire: I don’t either. For the vast majority of individuals, homelessness is no more of a “choice” than unemployment is.

    I was poking a bit at your logical progression that fewer women than men choose homelessness because women fear rape more than men do.

    And what sticks in many MRA’s minds is the hypocrisy of women claiming to want “equality” when it benefits them but also wanting to continue to enjoy greater protection and higher value in society when those benefit them.

    Denise: “I’m sorry you disliked it so, fourthwire. Have a beautiful day anyway!”

    fourthwire: Actually, I did not DISLIKE your blog, Denise. That’s not the case.

    In fact, I disliked your review of the crippled poet more, to the point where I couldn’t even think of any intelligible comment for it.

    I am sorry if my comments seemed overly harsh…….

    I was merely mourning the fact that in spite of your efforts to understand behavioral differences between men and women, you still have far to go in my humble but jaded opinion.

    And truth be told, I look forward to your writing on MND, more than ever.

    Even if I am disappointed in your choice of topic at times, and baffled or annoyed at the perspective shown, I give you credit for providing your perspective on MND.

    Denise: “It might interest you to know that my blog on William Hetherington was reprinted by someone else on the website antimisandry.com. There is a thread there that indicates several people on trying to take action on that very troubling injustice.”

    fourthwire: Thank you for the update on your William Hetherington blog’s reprint. I am pleased to see your conscience, and efforts in action, Denise! Amfortas is correct about the size of your heart…..:)

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/denise-noe/ Denise Noe

    fourthwire said,

    Denise, I would wager that the ACTUAL reason that homeless people are usually male is due to the fact that as a society we generally don’t give a rat’s ass about men, pure and simple.

    Men are generally viewed as having far less value in our gynocracy, and so are not provided with equal means to AVOID homelessness.

    (Denise) Men have always been the vast majority of the homeless and that would seem to reflect a matriarchal tradition. That tradition has always provided greater protections for women in desperate straits than for men similarly situated.

    fourthwire: I don’t know many men who would say to themselves, “I have one less orifice than women do…. so it must be safer for me to be homeless!”……

    (Denise) fourthwire, I don’t believe that very many people, whether male or female, choose to be homeless. It was Ronald Reagan who referred to people as being “homeless by choice” and this movie reminded me of that statement.

    fourthwire: Frankly, most of your blog reads as yet another femicentric piece, with a few bones schizophrenically tossed in there for the more vehement MRA’s.

    (Denise) I’m sorry you disliked it so, fourthwire. Have a beautiful day anyway!
    It might interest you to know that my blog on William Hetherington was reprinted by someone else on the website antimisandry.com. There is a thread there that indicates several people on trying to take action on that very troubling injustice.

  • amfortas

    I think you make some pertinent points, Denise, but the nature of the medium – a musical comedy – necessarily glosses over the reality and can only go so far skimming across the surface of motive and response to situation.

    Happy-go-lucky? I would see that as the underlying need of people (particularly men) to find even the smallest humour and rationale for where they find themselves. It is likely that slaves on oar-driven ships 2000 years ago cracked jokes and talked of the joys of the sea-life even though the bilges just feet below them were awash with their excrement. Just think on that. Think also on those ships with several levels of slaves chained to their places. !! You have to have a sense of humour when even your fellows haven’t much choice but to shit on you.

    A sense of ‘freedom’ can be conjoured out of even the most rancid air but make no mistake, there is nothing in being homeless that one would chose. That the bums in the park organised themselves and had some semblance of a ‘culture’ ( a more benign one that some durn furriners enjoy, maybe) is another feature. I do not see that in such full blown reality (there are no street or park courts where I am, even though kangaroos roam the golf courses) although the comeraderie and even the ‘unwritten’ codes one can become aware of in places like Salvation Army hostels or soup kitchens again shows that some elements of civil behaviour can exist.

    The ‘woman presence’ is interesting. As was pointed out in an MND featured article just a few weeks ago (Glenn, perhaps ?) George Orwell made it clear that the homeless male bum does not even have the homeless female bum to aspire to. She is looking upward, not sideways. She seeks Professor Higgins who will browbeat her into Princesshood, and whom she can later criticise for his lack of sensitivity.

    But it is a commonly held idea that women can ‘civilise’ men. Women love that idea as it gives them some vestige of leadership authority. It is nothing of the sort of course. The genitalia issue goes a lot deeper than rape. Its more the attitudinal issue. Men seek. Women Take from men. He seeks her out but she isn’t going to respond unless he coughs up some loot. He has to give her something along with himself whereas she gives nothing in return but herself. Is this the civilisation we talk of? Dress it up in the childbearing and childcare swaddling clothes and we have a whole rationale for expolitation and extortion.

    Get a job? In order to provide for a woman? That is seen as ‘aspiring’ on his part and ‘civilising’ on her part. Come on. Pull the other one. That old joke has been seen through thanks to the crassnesses of feminism. Men have been inventing, creating, slaving away for a thousand generations and, yes, for the benefit and comfort of women. Providing, protecting, supporting. One way trade. It worked just so long as no-one spoke about it. But of course the natural criticism faculty of women wasn’t held in check in this past century and the whole ‘civilising drive’ excuse fell over. Whine, complain, blame, calumnise. That’s what men have had for such a while now. It is hard to maintain a fiction in the face of such a stark reality.

    Frankly being a bum is a better option today than ever before. No-one to whine and criticise you all day.

    Denise, it ain’t Reagan. It’s women.

    Women blew it.

  • fourthwire

    Denise, I would wager that the ACTUAL reason that homeless people are usually male is due to the fact that as a society we generally don’t give a rat’s ass about men, pure and simple.

    Men are generally viewed as having far less value in our gynocracy, and so are not provided with equal means to AVOID homelessness.

    I don’t know many men who would say to themselves, “I have one less orifice than women do…. so it must be safer for me to be homeless!”……

    Frankly, most of your blog reads as yet another femicentric piece, with a few bones schizophrenically tossed in there for the more vehement MRA’s.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search