Keeping Dads Away from Their Babies

Background: The Boston Globe recently discussed Fathers & Families‘ shared parenting bill at great length in their editorial A fair role for fathers. While the Globe did not endorse the bill, the editorial essentially agrees with the main arguments behind shared parenting. Ned Holstein, MD, MS, Executive Director of Fathers & Families, responded to the Globe here.

I don’t know if anybody else caught it or thought of it, but I thought this paragraph from the Boston Globe editorial was particularly annoying.  The Globe wrote:

“Charles Kindregan, a law professor at Suffolk University, soundly argues that a presumption of joint legal and physical custody could handcuff judges who should be free to consider the best interests of children on a case-by-case basis. ‘You don’t need a presumption when you have facts,’ Kindregan says. The relevant facts include children’s age, temperament, emotional development, and medical needs, as well as how parents get along and how far apart parents live from each other. A judge looking at an infant will have to make very different decisions than a judge looking at a teenage boy.”

In case anybody missed it, what he said is code for “Dad can see the infant maybe an hour or two a week if he’s lucky, and if mom allows it.  However, we may be more solicitous of dad’s time when his kid is a teenager.  Of course, by then the kid will already be damaged from growing up without a father, but it’s okay for dad to spend real time with the kid, as long as mom is not unhappy about it, and as long as they still live within 1,000 miles of each other.”

The most irritating part of this is the presumption that an infant needs only its mother, not its father.  From time to time I get letters from mothers of infant children who are outraged that the fathers want to see the children and — gasp — want to spend some time with the infants in their own homes. 

Longtime readers of mine already know what I am going to say.  I have been the primary caregiver for my daughter, now almost 10 years old, from the time she was six weeks old.  Those first few years home all alone with her, before she went to preschool, were the greatest years of my life.  She and I shared everything together, and we were as happy and close as any two people could ever be. 

The only downside to it was that I worked in the evenings and my little girl would cry herself to sleep every night because she missed me and I was not there.  I still believe that one reason my daughter and I are so close are those special years we had together.

The Globe editorial and the expert it quotes are wrong–there is absolutely no reason why a father should be kept away from his baby or toddler, even if mom and dad are separated.


Stumble It!

Discuss this article

Print this page

Share/Save/Bookmark

More from Glenn Sacks

Trackback

Posted in: Vox Populi | 25 views

 


Comments • comment feed

How is it that this society finds it so easy to deprive male children of their fathers in a way female children are not deprived of their mothers ?

And then having thoroughly damaged male children in the abscence of fathers, the society then turns nasty, censorious and blameful on them for exhibiting consequencial behaviours of the bastardised son.

So corrupted and reckless have leading males and others in this society become regarding the walfare of males, even inadequate females are now held in greater esteem and wisdom regarding the needs of growing males.

In the good old days it was in a fathers pride and duty to groom his own sons’ from boyhood to manhood unrewarded. That is such that these sons themselves could take useful and lawful part in society and also rear good sons of their own.

But nowadays because we have so many rotten hearted and perfidious minded male leaders in office, we are told its in a womans social justice rights to usurp and monopolise the rearing of our sons. That is in return for, and expectation of cash profits to be forcibly snatched from fathers.

Well it is a good thing that young men are now waking up to the treachery of their seniors, whom will go on selling out the very ground on which males stand without a very sharp refute !!!

Posted by poiuyt Gravatar
February 29th, 2008
 

Hancuffing Judges. What a sound idea. Some gags would be useful too.

Posted by amfortas Gravatar
February 29th, 2008
 

Believe it or not there are some judges who support shared parenting (or access) but are not given the authority. Here in NY there is no provision for the courts to “order” shared parenting” or joint custody unless the parties agree. And even if the parties agree they can not if there are merely allegations of domestic violence or inability for the parties to get along. This is quite troublesome for some judges and law guardians who prefer to have the parties determine how to raise their family without court intervention.

Posted by NYC Family Law Attorney Gravatar
March 2nd, 2008
 

Please leave a reply...




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


 
 
 
 
 
tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily® © 2001 - 2009 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter