<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping Dads Away from Their Babies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/28/keeping-dads-away-from-their-babies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/28/keeping-dads-away-from-their-babies/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:46:59 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NYC Family Law Attorney</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/28/keeping-dads-away-from-their-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-59595</link>
		<dc:creator>NYC Family Law Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1864#comment-59595</guid>
		<description>Believe it or not there are some judges who support shared parenting (or access) but are not given the authority.  Here in NY there is no provision for the courts to &quot;order&quot; shared parenting&quot; or joint custody unless the parties agree.  And even if the parties agree they can not if there are merely allegations of domestic violence or inability for the parties to get along.  This is quite troublesome for some judges and law guardians who prefer to have the parties determine how to raise their family without court intervention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not there are some judges who support shared parenting (or access) but are not given the authority.  Here in NY there is no provision for the courts to &#8220;order&#8221; shared parenting&#8221; or joint custody unless the parties agree.  And even if the parties agree they can not if there are merely allegations of domestic violence or inability for the parties to get along.  This is quite troublesome for some judges and law guardians who prefer to have the parties determine how to raise their family without court intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amfortas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/28/keeping-dads-away-from-their-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-59514</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1864#comment-59514</guid>
		<description>Hancuffing Judges. What a sound idea. Some gags would be useful too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hancuffing Judges. What a sound idea. Some gags would be useful too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poiuyt</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/28/keeping-dads-away-from-their-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-59480</link>
		<dc:creator>poiuyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1864#comment-59480</guid>
		<description>How is it that this society finds it so easy to deprive male children of their fathers in a way female children are not deprived of their mothers ? 

And then having thoroughly damaged male children in the abscence of fathers, the society then turns nasty, censorious and blameful on them for exhibiting consequencial behaviours of the bastardised son.

So corrupted and reckless have leading males and others in this society become regarding the walfare of males, even inadequate females are now held in greater esteem and wisdom regarding the needs of growing males. 

In the good old days it was in a fathers pride and duty to groom his own sons&#039; from boyhood to manhood unrewarded. That is such that these sons themselves could take useful and lawful part in society and also rear good sons of their own.   

But nowadays because we have so many rotten hearted and perfidious minded male leaders in office, we are told its in a womans social justice rights to usurp and monopolise the rearing of our sons. That is in return for, and expectation of cash profits to be forcibly snatched from fathers.

Well it is a good thing that young men are now waking up to the treachery of their seniors, whom will go on selling out the very ground on which males stand without a very sharp refute !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that this society finds it so easy to deprive male children of their fathers in a way female children are not deprived of their mothers ? </p>
<p>And then having thoroughly damaged male children in the abscence of fathers, the society then turns nasty, censorious and blameful on them for exhibiting consequencial behaviours of the bastardised son.</p>
<p>So corrupted and reckless have leading males and others in this society become regarding the walfare of males, even inadequate females are now held in greater esteem and wisdom regarding the needs of growing males. </p>
<p>In the good old days it was in a fathers pride and duty to groom his own sons&#8217; from boyhood to manhood unrewarded. That is such that these sons themselves could take useful and lawful part in society and also rear good sons of their own.   </p>
<p>But nowadays because we have so many rotten hearted and perfidious minded male leaders in office, we are told its in a womans social justice rights to usurp and monopolise the rearing of our sons. That is in return for, and expectation of cash profits to be forcibly snatched from fathers.</p>
<p>Well it is a good thing that young men are now waking up to the treachery of their seniors, whom will go on selling out the very ground on which males stand without a very sharp refute !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
