• Log In
• Register
• Find Password

• home
• rss
• submission guidelines
• masthead
• letter from the editor
• mra principles and goals
• mnd lifestyles

Funny How That Job/Money Thing Doesn’t Work so Well When the Shoe’s on the Other Foot

Sunday, March 9, 2008

By Glenn Sacks

An interesting observation on dating, marriage and money via Non-Sequitur…

Families Against Confiscatory Child Support (FACCS) FACCS is the national voice for fair and reasonable child support. FACCS believes all parents have an obligation to support their children financially.  However, in high income cases, state and federal laws often result in excessive awards that are effectively alimony in disguise and have little to do with supporting children. Huge child support awards lead to protracted custody disputes, undermines co-parenting, and leaves children worse off financially.www.faccsonline.org / contact@faccsonline.org

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 9th, 2008 at 2:40 pm and is filed under Vox Populi. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. | 18 views | Trackback | Print this page |

| More from Glenn Sacks

Stumble It!

How to survive the coming food shortage.

4 Responses to “Funny How That Job/Money Thing Doesn’t Work so Well When the Shoe’s on the Other Foot”

1. 
   1
   amfortas Says:
   March 10th, 2008 at 3:29 am

   Women want 2 sorts of equality: the ’simple’ equality of men’s GOOD bits and all of their own good bits too; and ‘complete’ equality where the men keep all their bad bits and have all the women’s bad bits as well.

2. 
   2
   KRS Says:
   March 10th, 2008 at 9:50 am

   When it comes to money, most American women have an entitlement attitude. They live by the maxim… “What’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is ours.”

3. 
   3
   drex Says:
   March 10th, 2008 at 5:11 pm

   What does one expect from a gender that is basically highly dependant on men for its existance in civilised society?

   I found the advert for FACCS more interesting, I take it they dont have much interest in the financial difficulties that the vile child support laws create for poorer fathers?

   The main difference between a poor father and a rich father after the child support thieves have come along is that the rich father will be still able to keep his head above water while the poor dad is plunged into poverty.

   A millionaire who loses half his income is still richer than the average dad!

   Lets get real about the Financial Child Support issue, scrap the whole concept of it, rather than just make it better for the wealthy.

   Women only want rich men for their money, is that news here or something?

   Wake up!!

4. 
   4
   Bubba Says:
   March 11th, 2008 at 9:13 am

   “Rights without responsiblities” is the definition of a child.

   This is todays American female. All rights, but no absolute requirement to do anything.

   Get pregnant? Do whatever you want, he has no right.

   Pay for the child? He or the government will pay for her and the baby, she’s not required to do anything, but collect.

   “My money is my money, his money is mine too!” Sadly, is pervasive and expected. His money pays for the necessaries, hers for her hobbies/clothes etc.

   He tends to be an employee of the marriage, she the stockholder getting the benefits. Even when the partnership ends, she gets the continuing earnings even though she contributes nothing.

   Most women don’t want equality, they sure don’t act it. When it benefits them….it’s only fair, when it benefits him…it’s sexist.

Leave a Reply