93 Year Old American Men Teased, Arrested & Persecuted by 23 Year Old American Women
When the Spitzer scandal was in the news, I noted how Spitzer had been the puppet of anti-sex feminists and was possibly “acting out†in resistance to his subordinate position to them. Then I noted that it was dangerous for America when politicians have to pay so much money for sex and I asked why politicians could no longer get sex for free (answer: because both the right wing and left wing politicians surround themselves with feminists).
But while such serious analysis of the Spitzer scandal was published on blogs, the unserious rag New York Times went into overdrive trying to spin the anti-male-sex-drive feminist agenda. In a one-sided article begging the federal government to regulate prostitutioninside state lines, the feminist eunuch puppet Nicholas Kristoff mimics the way Spitzer himself used to talk when he says that Spitzer’s whore was apparently privileged unlike the proverbial teenage runaways who are victims of black inner-city pimps. Because Kristoff never directly mentions that the pimping of runaways is apparently a black inner city phenomenon, one would be led to believe that white teenagers are readily available for sex to sex-starved middle class males across the United States.
Kristoff mentions that there is now some sort of law moving through Congress (it apparently passed the House with the typical vote of 405 idiots vs Ron Paul) that would federally regulate prostitution (now misleadingly described as sex trafficking). Eunuch Gary Bauer of the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) apparently wants the Christian evangelist “movement†to work hand in hand with the NOW to make sure the feds have more power than ever via this law, the name of which Kristoff and/or the New York Times editors failed to mention in his article.Â
Why would Kristoff and the New York Times leave the name of the proposed law out of the above article?
Could it be that they are trying, as they have sucessfully done in the past with VAWA and IMBRA, to help get something ram-rodded through Congress without debate over its Constitutionality?Â
Mention is made in Kristoff’s article of how Sweden should be the model for the USA in that Sweden has a federal law where it is legal for a woman to be a prostitute but it is ILLEGAL for a man to want to be her customer. In Sweden, gorgeous young female policewomen carry out sting operations where they try to ruin the lives of older more successful males; the patriarchy.
In saying that the US should be as feminist as Sweden and have a federal law criminalizing being a john…is Kristoff trying to make some kind of joke? Apparently not. He is seriously auditioning to sing in the Castrati Choir which is where Spitzer sang when he was governor of New York.
Believe me, Swedish men do not consider their anti-male law fair and men in neighboring countries have made sure their politicians are warned not to vote for something similar in their parliaments. Last year, Finland and Estonia outlawed sex trafficking but defined it as having sex with a prostitute against her will or if she was mentally retarded. The Finnish feminists were furious that the law was changed at the last second to define sex trafficking as being against the will of the prostitute.
Would it be that the US Congress dared to even define sex trafficking.
Except for Sweden, Saudi Arabia and the USA, there is plenty of freedom for men in this world to buy time with a woman at least to try to talk her out of being a prostitute. I know plenty of men who have paid a prostitute for the chance to try to talk her out of being one. Some ugly men have to pay for sex and I don’t blame them on that either. Prostitution is a big business in American strip clubs where, in regions like the south and northwest, American coeds decide which guys are allowed to be their customers. Wherever it is clamped down upon in the US, the oldest profession just pops right back up again in the next county. It cannot be stopped.
Federal anti-male laws that criminalize men for being weak, curious or for wanting to talk with a woman are just not acceptable from a country that thinks it deserves to remain a world power.
This leads us to the focus of this article: In Florida, two 93 year old males were recently arrested because beautiful young female plain-clothes policewomen had indicated they were available to them and they were lonely and took the bait.
The journalists, who reported on these 93 year old men, never mentioned if the men had served their country in World War Two or Korea, fighting against fascism and socialism. The journalists never mentioned that, for 6000 years, prostitution might have been made illegal or legal, but never were men arrested for just being would-be customers. This is typical of the US media…they pretend that their progressive views are more natural than the views of 6000 years worth of various civilizations including superpowers like the Assyrians, Babylonians, Parthians, Goths, Persians and Greeks.
The US media don’t even bother comparing their latest legislative accomplishments with the history of matriarchal Celtic societies.
If a woman-run society like the USA wants to criminalize prostitution, then arrest the prostitutes and the pimps, but leave out sting operations where men are entrapped. Entrapment is defined as where a reasonable temptation is presented.
Men can tell if a woman has prostituted herself dozens or hundreds of times. This makes her very undesirable. Conversely, men can tell if a woman is an amateur who has never prostituted herself and this would cause fascination at the very least if she seems to be acting like she is a prostitute. This is the effect that a gorgeous young policewoman would have if she acted as a decoy. She would be presenting a level of quality that does not really exist in the real sex business. Heck, if men knew a woman was a cop, she would be that much more attractive for flirting with them.
Keep in mind that most prostitutes are ugly and/or lower class and/or underprivileged non-whites. It is for this reason that most middle class white American males would never consider touching a prostitute. We are scared of disease first and foremost. Even on the Turkish Riviera, where US and British feminists pretend exists a burgeoning sex slave market, the Ukrainian prostitutes are all chain smokers who are extraordinarily undesirable (and are thus probably not there involuntarily).
Imagine, however, a middle-aged man out on a date with a clean-smelling middle-class American college coed who surprisingly and amateurishly tells him after dinner that going further will cost him $200 and she’s never done this before…I can guarantee that 95% of the men in that scenario would consider the proposition. Marc Rudov wouldn’t have gotten his start criticizing men for buying their girlfriends and wives, if it were not true that most men are, in fact, willing to pay for sex. Prostitution, in theory, would be as natural as breathing. Humans just want it to be done discretely.
Stopping the entrapment of males by attractive young sex police should be a top 10 priority for the Men’s Rights Movement.
Whereas the courts have successfully argued that those men caught on To Catch a Predator could not claim that sex with a minor under 16 was a reasonable temptation, it would be horrifying to see the Supreme Court claim that a 93 year old man should not consider it a temptation for a buxom 23 year old woman to offer to let him touch her for $20 (I assume a 93 year old man could not do much other than that).
If a gorgeous American policewoman told me that I could touch her for $20, and I did so and got arrested, I would have to dedicate my life to getting those arrested who created those laws and the officer arrested and charged with entrapment. Other countries and their media should consider shaming American men into finally standing up for themselves.
After living in so many other countries with more freedom, I would be so shocked and outraged at even having my name smudged for doing something as natural as breathing with someone else and then watching a government get involved in the relationship. It simply must not be a crime to be a male and be willing to pay for a date or for any kind of social interaction, which is what men do all the time anyway. The female police officers who arrested what are possibly World War Two veterans should have been the ones who were arrested in the Florida sting operation. Where are the names of these offending police officers in those reports?
We have a right to know their names.
| More from Jim Peterson
Stumble It!
March 26th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
Carry pepper spray and spray the “prostitute” in the face–ESPECIALLY if you think she’s a plain-clothes cop.
You can always say that you thought you were being targeted by these prostitutes who use their pimps to roll and murder their Johns.
When these undercover (usually bull-dyke) cop-prostitutes guess WRONG about a guy being interested if they had consequences (instead of the target saying “no thanks” and moving on) maybe they would start to reconsider.
March 26th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
One is better of just being single. Dating and marriage just isn’t worth it anymore. And with so many other things to keep a guy occupied computers, etc. Why bother with girls?
March 26th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
“The debate over the bill comes amid broader questions over how many victims are trafficked into the United States. The government estimated in 1999 that about 50,000 slaves were arriving in the country every year. That estimate was revised downward in 2004 to 14,500 to 17,500 a year. Yet since 2000, and despite 42 Justice Department task forces and more than $150 million in federal dollars to find them, about 1,400 people have been certified as human trafficking victims in this country, a tiny fraction of the original estimates.”
Washington Post Nov 29, 07
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/28/AR2007112802282.html
March 26th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
A 23 y/o policewoman who entraps a 93 y/o man for a sexual offence, using her sexual appeal to do so, is corrupt. Morally corrupt.
I do not agree with prostitution nor the excuses offered for its existence. I do accept its universality and longevity as a human activity but neither are sufficient to justify continuing it. Nor do I accept the hormonal excuses for men paying for sex or agreeing to pay for it. The entire edifice of prostitution is built upon the concept of male low self esteem and female faux self esteem. Both are driven by women.
Now it appears that men having a low regard for their own worth and value are to be further punished by deliberately inciting its evinced behaviours.
The tactical responses suggested (pepper spray, bargaining) can be added to until the cows come home, swinging their udders ‘in ya face’. How about reversing the bargaining? If she wants $20 for a ‘touch up’, then MY price for the privilege of my touch is $30. She suggests $150 for a f*ck, well MY price is $250.
Marriage. Let’s get back to some compensation for taking on the daily punishment of a home-harpy. She can put a deposit of $100,000 down at engagement (and pay the friggin’ wedding costs) and pay an annual $50k for a thrice-weekly f*ck. I will give discounts for quickies.
March 27th, 2008 at 1:40 am
Jim Peterson,
What a contrast between Florida and Nevada laws? Could not the 93 year old men if Florida be senile or suffering from Alzheimers disease. So much money is spent on female decoy officers, while crime is high in Florida
I don’t no if this quote is acurate, but Nevada rural counties use reverse technique.
“Nevada is the only state in the U.S. where houses of ill repute are a legitimate business. Prostitutes are licensed. Owners pay property taxes, and county sheriffs nab customers who leave without paying. Las Vegas, by state law, is brothel-free, but in rural Nevada sin is alive if not thriving.”
March 28th, 2008 at 12:26 am
Get three men together, make a citizens arrest, have the stooge arrested, and demand prosecution. Be sure to call the media so the cameras are rolling when you arrest the person.
March 28th, 2008 at 12:27 am
if possible have a friendly attorney with you to argue with the police and prosecutor.
March 28th, 2008 at 1:55 am
[Now it appears that men having a low regard for their own worth and value are to be further punished]
In most cases of men visiting ugly and diseased whores, the estimation of low self worth on the part of the man is accurate. Basically, if a man pays for someone who is far below what he could easily get if he had some confidence…there is a problem.
Often that problem is laziness: in Germany, men visit prostitutes because they don’t want to go through the process of dating someone new especially as their wife would be more likely to find out about an ongoing relationship than something that started and ended in half an hour.
But there is another factor in the hypothetical direct purchase of sex:
Everybody stands, more or less, on a hierarchy of *what they can get*.
Prostitution should be illegal if the prostitutes are on the lowest rung of the social ladder and their customers are men who could do better if they only had more confidence or were not so lazy or trying to quickly cheat on a wife.
However, what if all of America’s upper middle class college coeds suddenly put themselves out on the open market? That would create an entirely new motive for the customers because now men would be buying what they probably would never have been able to get otherwise.
Then it would not necessarily be a case of “low self esteem” if some unhappily married men took advantage of the suddenly favorable market conditions.
I am at a beach resort right now, kind of like a Carnival Cruise, where there are tons of gorgeous women. After a few days of settling in, it seems that one highly intelligent and interesting woman over 30 likes me and will get my time in the remaining days that I am here. Some younger women seem disappointed, but still others who are wildly gorgeous, not only don’t seem to notice that I seem to have found someone, but are now seen walking on the beach with musclebound studs.
Now…e ceterus paribas, if I was not really attracted to the woman I am spending time with and I really, really wanted to be with one of those 18 year old hotties walking with the musclebound dudes…then I would, theoretically, be open to paying $500 to divert their attention (theoretically).
I have mentioned that the hottest women will never work directly as prostitutes because the hottest women will want to pick and chose their customers. This is why strippers are much hotter looking than prostitutes and why the best looking available women simply wait innocently for rich guys to approach them and offer to pay for dates and vacations.
So, for me, if because of my looks (if I were 93 and my wife long dead), I was being totally shut out of all action at this resort and I was watching hundreds of gorgeous young women hook up with other guys…I would theoretically want to buy some action on the open market. But I would NEVER call an escort agency or go to actual whorehouses and official prostitutes like Spitzer’s gal would still be a NO GO for me for two reasons:
1) Only ugly women work as the kind of prostitute who takes all customers. A call girl is likely to be the ugliest of all because she is willing to have sex with a man who is unseen. Even in the Antalya region of the Turkish Riviera, the socalled desperate Ukrainian women whores are all ugly chain smokers (there are no slaves as the BBC dishonestly reported recently).
2) Fear of disease. The study the other day found 1 in 4 normal teenage girls in America to have HPV or worse….prostitutes would probably have a worse statistical outlook.
I would want the same quality that I saw myself being shut out from at the resort. I would want what the musclebound dudes were getting.
So, if I were ugly or 93 and lonely, it would have less to do with my “self esteem” than my situation if I had a hypothetical willingness to pay one of the gorgeous young women at the resort $500 to hang around me and not the musclebound 22 year old man she’s been getting to know.
And the “transaction” would probably not be a direct one (in Europe the women are not as direct as American women can be). What I would do is start chatting with the young pair and get across that, if I could only find a single woman, she would get dresses and jewelry and free trips everywhere else, etc. She might then dump the bore she is with.
I differ from Marc Rudov in that I recognize that some men will pay to be with an American woman that, no matter how much confidence and conversational skill he had, he would because of his looks or age NEVER be able to get otherwise but greatly desires to have.
Where Marc and I would agree is that we VOTERS must not allow ugly old men to buy their sex by selling our rights.
A few years ago I was on the beach in Florida and I tried an experiment with a girlfriend with me. We offered $20 to beautiful women on the beach to take photos for an Internet site. Most women accepted happily.
I know that I could have then offered more money for more things as they felt relaxed with me and my girlfriend. One young woman took us to lunch (on my dime) and basically begged for us to help her prolong her vacation for which she would do anything we wanted with us within reason. We refused politely.
I tried the same experiment in Germany but it would not work there because German women are not money oriented like Americans.
March 28th, 2008 at 10:49 pm
It seems as if the 12 female only excuses to get away with crime is not a BAKERS DOZEN. In reality it is most likely many more then that.
March 28th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
that should have been…Now a BAKERS DOZEN