YouTube, Duked: Teen Boys Victims of a "Rape" Staged by A Mother

Thursday, April 3, 2008
By David R. Usher

This week YouTube found out why radical feminism is dangerous — particularly the aggregated N.O.W., V-Day, Vagina Monologues, Avon, Mary Kay Cosmetics, UNIFEM cult that hides a variety of unsavory core elements comprising the true feminist agenda behind a veil of false claims about domestic violence and demanding language about “Empowering Women”.

It turns out that a YouTube video clip of a 24-year-old mother who was supposedly being raped by three teen boys while her children screamed was apparently an event she planned, but subsequently alleged rape after a cell-phone video of the event ended up on YouTube.

False rape claims have always been commonplace. But these days, DNA and modern electronic evidence gathering technology is catching more of these false claims along with the women who commit these horrid crimes against men and boys. This does not help the many innocent men convicted on hearsay evidence years ago who are still waiting to be freed by the Innocence Project.

In the case ju-jours, Scotland Yard has arrested the mother on suspicion of having sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old and perverting the course of justice. Scotland Yard says it will take no further action against the boys, who we find out are the victims.

I would like to know who shot the video. It could be an accomplice of the mother, but could be another teen who decided to secretly document the event and “out” the mother.

This woman should be locked up for a very long time. To sexualize children in the context of a one-act feigned rape crosses all the limits. She essentially acted out the “good rape” that is the centerpiece of the Vagina Monologues — but with a twist: she taught the young boys that, as feminist Robin Morgan claims, even consensual sex is “rape”. To have her children watch it adds another layer of guilt: she was teaching her own children that sex is a male predatory act. It will take years for the boys and her children to heal from this — if they ever do.

Her actions apparently indicate a high degree of intentional planning. She knew that if she made it “look” like a rape, and had the boys “act it out”, the boys could not possibly mention it to anyone. What a way to make “our little secret” work for a feminist child sexual abuser. The savior or sicko who took the video should be rewarded or punished accordingly.

I do not blame YouTube for this. YouTube has been “Duked” too. Much good has come from YouTube providing a “town square” enabling citizens to reveal truths the mainstream media censors. Today, you can see that too many women and young girls are, in fact, capable of great intentional and unwarranted violence against each other and men. Awful things done by teachers, adults, and other children have been “outed” for handling by law enforcement. All it takes is one whistleblower with a cell phone to make it happen. This is finally balancing public understanding about violence, much to the chagrin and vehement denial of feminists.

I suggest to YouTube and authorities there should be a way for users to flag videos that may be documentation of crimes to authorities and YouTube — and that YouTube should then apply reasonable decency standards moving offensive videos from public space to private secured space for use by police and criminal investigators when videos are too digusting for public viewing.

Feminism has truly achieved an equality of strange proportions. You won’t ever hear feminists hailing their equality for it is the perception that women are still suffering a helpless state of Victorianism that gives feminists an increasingly flimsy pedestal from which to perform horrid acts and then pretend that men or little boys did it to them.

A take-away worth learning and pursuing: Universities must not allow productions of the “Vagina Monologues” or V-Day “celebrations” on campus. These are ultimately violent, supremacist cliques whose attitudes closely parallel the styles of hate glorification and “selective group purity” seen in other well-known cult groups not ever allowed to set foot on campus. When we closely consider what radical feminists, radical racists, and radical Islamicists think, the only major difference visible is the target for hate, social abuse, and economic looting.

Christopher Hitchens accidentally revealed the core truth of feminism in his article “The Tall Tale of Tuzla“.  Hillary Clinton is a professional feminist — who pursuing standard feminist strategy attempted to make herself a heroic victim by inventing a convenient fairy tale about being strafed by gunfire when she visited Bosnia.  Of this Hitchens said: “There are two kinds of deliberate and premeditated deceit, commonly known as suggestio falsi and suppressio veri. (Neither of them is covered by the additionally lying claim of having “misspoken.”)”.

Truer words were never spoken about feminism.

————————————————-

David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network, and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition

| More from David R. Usher

Stumble It!

Share/Save/Bookmark

How to survive the coming food shortage.

One Response to “YouTube, Duked: Teen Boys Victims of a "Rape" Staged by A Mother”

  1. 1
    anti armchair generals Says:

    David R. Usher
    Vagina Monolues have been modied so that the 13-years old girl is depicted as a 16-years old. Legal action is threatened if the old version is used.
    Fom Wikipedia

    In “The Little Coochie Snorcher that Could”, a thirteen-year-old girl recounts being fed alcohol and then having sex with an adult woman; the incident is recalled fondly by the grown girl, who closes the monologue with the line, “If it was rape, it was good rape.” After Eve Ensler linked The Vagina Monologues with “V-Day” (a proposed day of remembrance for victims of female sexual abuse, to replace Valentine’s Day), the “good rape” line was excised from the script, the girl’s age was changed to sixteen, and warnings were issued to individuals putting on the play that using older scripts containing the line constituted a copyright violation and was grounds for legal action.”

Leave a Reply

Search MND

Introducing MRm: A New Men's Rights Magazine in PDF format

Download PDF Here

Support Our Sponsors!

Please support MND

Subscribe today:

SUSTAINER: $5/mo.


CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.


SUPPORTER: $50/mo.


Or Donate Any Amount

Archives

privacy policy | terms of service


Site Meter

MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!