A Great Disturbance in the Farce

2008-04-09
By

Terri Lynn Tersak, President of True Equality Network penned the following roast of the United States Congress. 2008 is shaping up to be the most useless and expensive Presidential election in history. There is not one candidate speaking to the core structural factors driving social decline and subsequently the economy, federal deficits, the value of the dollar, lack of health care, poverty, the decade-long epidemic of violent children of both sexes, and federal social expenditures eating a largest percentage of the federal budget.

A coterie of girlie men and women who, regardless of party, are all owned by K-Street feminists, actually think we are stupid enough to vote of any of them. Turning every international issue into an exportable hate issue does not distract our eye from the primary duties of President and Congress in attending to the problem of “marriage absence” — the greatest social problem we face and the primary predictor of every other domestic dilemma we now face.

Congress’s answers have been the problem since the 1960′s, when social spending entitling the wanton destruction of marriage was invented by Frankfurt School socialists capable of spin that sounds so ’60′s when drooled by Hillary’s lips.

Lacking structural change in federal laws and funding patterns, there is no possibility that a sustainable recovery can take place in the foreseeable future.

The farce is with us. We look to 2012 and beyond.

A Great Disturbance in the Farce

by Terri Lynn Tersak

The other night Senator John McCain appeared on the show, “Late Night, with David Letterman.” During his talk with the show’s host, this war hero Senator reflected on the spending abuses of Congress, noting that it is common to say of this that Congress has acted like, “drunken Sailors on leave.”

The Senator then conveyed the content of an email communication from a veteran who expressed his upset, “…being a former drunken sailor …,“ being compared to the likes of Congress. I do not blame this veteran for being upset. I personally would rather be compared to maggot-infested manure than the United States Congress.

There is no longer any pretense of the true allegiance of the United States Congress, as they were bought and paid for by special interest and corporate sponsorship long before I was born. The notion that they represent the people is a farce.

But in the spirit of trying to compare our heroes who risked and many gave it all for the freedoms we have to the collection of whore-mongering swindlers in Congress, I offer an example the shows how far from the mark Congress is from being heroic and how perverse the deceptions of this farce are.

To our heroes that we owe everything to, I offer a true comparison of how the United State Congress stands up to you.

It took the United States Marines Corps less time to obliterate the Iraqi Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to dial 911 while a woman was drowning in his car. In what is the most perverted insult to American women, this man is permitted to be a member of the US Senate Judiciary Committee that produces the federal laws governing the treatment of women in our country (the Violence Against Women Act, as one example), while our veterans are denied respect, medical services, and their natural right to be parents.

Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?

The American people owe it to every veteran to stand-up to anyone who would disgrace them by equating them in anyway to greatest farce on earth, the United States Congress.

Our slogan has always been presented in blood-red to honor the memory of those who paid the ultimate price to create and protect the freedoms we too often take for granted. Never forget that we owe them everything …

1 views

  • http://www.standyourground.com/forums poiuyt

    ahh..

    … perhaps it is the bigotry and prejudiced sentiments of the people themselves that drives the institutional expression of misandry which itself causes so many other structural problems in pre-facist societies.

    Why would congressioners and senators advocate and institute irrational anti-male legislation if it were not what the general electorate wanted ?

    The special, corporate and feminist interests are only making hay on the foundations presented to them by a prejudicialy contaminated electorate. That is, an electorate predisposed to the ideas and ideals of legitimising unfairness against this or that group for this or that imagined reason.

    A simpler structural solution would be enforce the constitutional fact that America is one nation of one people subject to one law. That is enforced, irrespective of the sex, religion, class, race or creed of the citizen.

  • Jim Peterson

    Yet not even those of us who get on TV will dare mention VAWA. Why is that? Ask Marc Rudov to please start mentioning VAWA on TV.

  • Artfldgr

    an article that refers to the franfurt schoo, and yet spouts their internalized message in their own dialogue.

    I personally would rather be compared to maggot-infested manure than the United States Congress.

    the franfurt school was not just about marraige, they were about self destruction of the culture through internalizing self hate. in fact, nihilist self hate becomes a habit and has to be added to documents to court and show that the person has the right distaste for their own system. however, critical theory insures that while hating it, they will not fix it, they will just go on spouting hateful stuff which builds a bias for other systems.

    In one broad stroke, every politiican and person in the best form of government that ANY nation has every had, that has led to all that we hold dear, can be all painted as maggots.

    how could we even attempt to fix somehing worse than “maggot-infested manure”? and thats the point, one gets the feeling that one cant, then one may get the feeling to try something else instead when it presents itself.






Search