This has a lot to do with MRA’s:
A) It displays that women can use PAS even in lesbian relationships (thus solidifying the claim PAS is real and harmful) but more importantly leads into:

B) the victim of PAS this time is a woman! As we all know protecting women in society is a much much easier sell then protecting men. So if MRA’s can use this reverse-gender custody battle (and the judge makes a positive-NCP ruling) this ruling will automatically apply to fathers too

C) Most importantly: it’s no secret that NOW and other womyn’s organizations are hugely populated with bulldykes. If we can highlight this case and ask these lesbians “how would YOU FEEL if……..” it could possibly shift the whole paradigm in the women’s groups establishments.

Last year I saw footage of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream speech” at the reflecting pool in D.C.

The crowd was about a good 50-70% white. What does this tell me? That civil rights (for blacks) wouldn’t have been won if not for hard-core white followers who believed real oppression and harm was going on against black.

Like it or not men/fathers are the new blacks. We CANNOT stand alone in this. Our only chance is getting as many people (men/women/black/white/latino/asian) in on this as possible–even lesbians.

TMOTS

The fact that the mother went Christian means that the lesbians lifestyle is abhorrent to the mother and counter to the religion – hence the woman is a bad influence. Having her around would be no different than if she was a drug dealer that the mother wished to avoid contact with.

While I sympathize that the tactic that is similar to what vindictive women do to their “ex’s”, why don’t we save the emotion for natural relationships.

If the lesbian wants a child, I’m sure there’s a test tube available somewhere.

It’s the whole idea that “dad” is whoever mom says he is that got children and fathers into the travesties they now routinely suffer. From the perspective of the child, the other parent is the “anonymous donor”, period, whether this unfortunate little girl understands that yet or not.

Maybe the “anonymous donor” is anonymous because he doesn’t even know he has a little girl. Maybe he is you or me. If not, then he is a true “deadbeat” who “abandoned” his child, and mommy wanting it that way doesn’t make it right.

You see, it’s not what mothers want that is most important like our gynocracy would have you believe, it’s what is right and best for children, families, and society, just as all societies understood well before the gynocrats took over and got our children and families and society into this hell.

Anybody with a clue knows that the prevailing “her choice” theology of feminist jurisprudence is bad for women too, but if this case and Glenn’s analysis comparing the “lesbian social mother” to an actual father helps some of the slower among us get their head out of the sand, then that’s a good thing.

And it also has nothing to do with men getting screwed by their exes, other than being proof that all women can be evil.

Glenn, homosexuality is wrong. That being said, what two people do in their own home is no business of mine (and I would appreciate you and the gay mafia stop trying to shove it down my throat).