Fred Reed
On Generals Testifying Before Congress

Whenever I see that some dismal general will testify to Congress regarding the war against Iraq, I imagine the first paragraph of his Power Point presentation:

“All metrics show a downsurge in the violence in Iraq, and a continuing improvement in indicators of the production of a better life. Next slide. The Iranians are aiding the enemies of America, and must be bombed. This is a recording.”

What solemn, fraudulent, emetic mummery. Congressmen will—do—ask the General puffball questions, after which they will do whatever the President tells them to do. I can make no criticism of this. It is the American way. Still, may I suggest a few questions I would like to see the General, any general, asked?

1) General, five years ago the Commander in Chief said that combat operations in Iraq had ended. Since this isn’t true, the Commander in Chief was either lying, delusional, or simply a fool. Which do you believe to be the case?

2) You have said on various occasions that Iran is meddling in Iraq, that it is supplying weapons, fighters, and training to the warring factions. Others have charged that the United States is meddling in Iraq, that it is supplying weapons, troops, and training in Iraq. Which of these assertions do you believe to be the more accurate? Have you seen any evidence of American involvement?

3) You have expressed a commendable admiration for our soldiers, saying that they are the finest young men of our nation. Would you let your daughter date a black Pfc. with a GED? A kid named Gonzalez with tattoos?

4) Permit me a personal question, General. Have you ever said anything but “yes” to anyone who could affect your chances of promotion? Can you give us examples?

I have received a letter from a squad leader in Baghdad who suggests that always saying “yes” qualifies you as a streetwalker but not as a soldier. I am sure this isn’t true. That is, I am sure you could be a soldier as well. Will you explain to us why the sergeant is wrong? Can you give the Congress a reason to believe that anything other than your career matters to you?

5) Excuse me, but I have a question concerning your health. I know the sun is very bright in Baghdad. Might it be that when you were putting suntan lotion on your face, you somehow missed your nose? It seems much darker. The country cannot lightly afford to risk skin cancer in its officers.

6) General, years from now, when you loll in some sunny clime writing your memoirs, perhaps having served as a handsome and chiseled Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, tens of thousands of enlisted men will be living with colostomy bags or white canes or missing legs or the ruins of faces. Does this in any way bother you?

On second thought, I withdraw the question as irrelevant. Pardon my foolishness, General.

7) I assume that you must have many qualifications for administering a counterinsurgency operation in the Middle East. Here I mean things other than being photogenic or a wizard with Power Point. For example, I am certain that you speak Arabic well, as do the Commander in Chief, President Cheney, and Condo Rice. For the record, will you confirm this?

8) Let me drop for a moment into the dry details of soldiering. No doubt this will be boring shop talk to many in this chamber, but I believe we can spare a moment.

A constituent who served in Viet Nam wrote me with the following account of someone who has “taken a round” (that is the military phrase, I believe?) through the face. He says that teeth shatter, the jawbone dangles from the head with white stuff showing where it was attached, blood spurts from the arteries in the top of the mouth, one eye bulges out from the concussion, and the man jerks his arms strangely and says “Kuh-kuh-kuh” until he dies from drowning in blood. This takes a few minutes, the sergeant says.

Do you believe the Public Affairs Office of the Pentagon is right in saying that squads should carry plastic bags for covering the man’s face? So that reporters don’t take pictures and give the public a misleading idea of the war?

9) Critics of the military say harsh and, I am sure, unjustified things, such as that generals are simply hired murderers and have no more honor or morality that hit men for the Mafia. I want you to understand that I do not for a moment believe this. I am sure that you would not kill thousands of people you don’t know on command of some nonentity, and then accept strange-looking medals for doing so. To rebuke those voices that say such ugly things, would you give us an example of a country you would not attack if ordered to? Name something you would not do for another star?

10) Will you explain the surgical use of a five-hundred-pound bomb in a densely populated suburb?

11) General, if an Iraqi army attacked your home state in an endeavor to impose democracy on the United States, killed thousands of your fellow citizens, and left your daughter of seven years screaming as she died of burns, what would you do? Would you accept Islam with gratitude and embrace democracy? Or would you fight the invaders? Would you spend the rest of your life trying to kill as many of them as you could, in any way that you could? Just curious.

12) Some of your critics, sir—misinformed, I am sure—say that you send kids from small Southern towns to die while you work on your Power Point presentations. To put this foul canard to rest, would you tell us how much time you have spent in combat as compared to a rifleman on his fifth tour?

13) Finally, General, can you estimate the number of veterans in wheelchairs, blind, gutshot, lacking genitals, on crutches, having nightmares of when Jim Dog took a round through the lungs north of Vung Tau—guys of that sort, in the Disabled American Veterans, in expat bars around the world, in upcountry Thailand and the middle of Mexico—who hate men like you with a dark intensity that makes them pull the arms off chairs when they think about it, so that even their friends back away, a hatred that would make it most unwise for you to be near?

Just asking. And thank you so much. For your testimony, I mean.

For more Fred, visit FredOnEverything.net

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Wikio
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Blogosphere News
  • Live
  • BlogMemes
  • Furl
  • Blogsvine
  • TailRank
  • Spurl

Stumble It!

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 1 views | Other posts by Fred Reed

Possibly Related Posts:

  • JIM KOURI
  • ...
  • Nigerian President Retires 40 Army Generals
  • ...
  • General nuisances
  • ...
  • More Sectarian Violence in Iraq
  • ...
  • Jim Kouri
  • ...

    3 Comments »

    1. TXM said,

      Ever since I got back from Afghanistan, people have been asking me what is really going on over there. I served as an aide-de-camp to a brigadier general of one of the taks forces there, so I was in an excellent position to give detailed answers.

      The trouble was that there was so much going on that it was hard to share any common frame of reference with either my friends or family, and they were sympathetic audiences.

      The fact is we worked 14 hour days, 7 days per week, month after month. We tracked every concievable metric, and traveled all over that country talking to commanders, NCOs and troops from all service components, Army, Navy, Air force, Marines, National Guard and Reserves (they were all in our task force). We also visited with heads of state, ministers and home visits to local villagers… basically I have a very good idea what’s going on.

      We did amazing work, and we made a huge, powerful, positive difference in that country.

      I know my level of understanding of Afghanistan pales in comparison to General Patraeus’ understanding of Iraq. What this author doesn’t appreciate is the man’s vast and deep grasp of the real issues at hand. I just can’t understand how anyone can listen to Patraeus’ presentation and not be awed by his tremendous command across the breadth and depth of the subject of the war in Iraq. If the author of this mindless article actually wanted to understand what was happening in Iraq, he could get no better place to begin than with those power-point slides he derides so much.

      God! What makes Reed think he is so much smarter with his little smart-ass questions? Look, General Patraeus was tasked to take over the war. He is doing his job, and he is doing it amazingly well. Patraeus would do any job the civillian leaders of this country assigned him. That is called duty.

      But Reed compares a magnificent general who is literally re-writing Army doctrine in assymetrical operations to a “yes-man” who cares for nothing more than his career. Reed has missed the point by so much I can’t even think of the words to describe it. He’s got me so mad, my blood vessles are bursting in my head.

      Reed, you don’t know what the hell you are talking about. Certainly not about Iraq. I think this display of your gross ignorance brings into question ever other assertion you make about world politics. Could it be you are not a smart guy, but just a fool?

      April 16, 2008 at 11:41 am

    2. Squiggy said,

      General, five years ago the Commander in Chief said that combat operations in Iraq had ended.

      Fred, please don’t insult our intelligence. This is not the Daily Kos or Democratic Underground. All of us here know this is a lie. Bush never said that, and didn’t imply that.

      And just for your info, America did go to the moon.

      April 16, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    3. JohnG said,

      Fred,

      You’re obviously a product of public schooling. Last time I checked the officer corps couldn’t countermand the commander in chief and they are also restricted from public criticism. Constitutionally, the military is subservient to civilian leadership.

      While most military and vets will agree that some generals are buffoons, the bottom line remains that it’s the prez that gives the orders.

      I suppose we could try letting the military do as it “really wants to” or say what it wants. A military coup may do us good. The military know what treason and sedition is. We’ve got the death penalty and we don’t bullsh*t around for 20 years getting around to it.

      April 17, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Blogwonks: Free Wordpress Blog Hosting
    BLOGWONKS.com is a your online news and blogging partner. Just click here to sign up for your free WordPress blog. You can customize your blog to display the latest RSS postings from your favorite websites. You can keep a diary, upload images and media files, and even register visitors on your site. Sign up now! It's FREE!
    MND Opinion
    editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
    MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
    Site Meter
    RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
    counter