Get real. Get on with your life and deal with reality.

Corruption has driven its rot into the heart of western democracy which has been weakened irretrievably by Feminism.

The virus of feminism preceded the current corrupt regimes of ‘Child support’ and ‘Family Court’, and brought on all the rigid and corruptible beaurocratic cogs and wheels that grind good men into dust, families into penury and children into the epicentre of a heartquake.

The virus has infected all western countries and the odd howl from Sweden does little to cure, other than press the nurse-call-button. The nurse is State paid though and whatever cold compress she brings does little to hold the fever in check.

That drive for for a false and mendacious equality, a guise for envy, saw its early light become a moth-attracter which in turn attracted greedy, avaricious birds to the feast. Carrion birds.

But I have questions, Terri.

These 40,000 members “comprised mainly of women”, Terri. Victims of the corruption? Or once partakers of the feeding frenzy? Have they declared their revulsion at what they have done?

TEN sounds to be very effective in seeking out the details, even in the strip clubs and shelters, but just how has this group come about? Out of nowhere it seems arises a body of mainly women who have been strangly silent to date, now digging away, and now starting to find voice. But what voice is it to be?

“Some as recipient custodial parents, others as the wives/significant others of male child support obligors, and other as the parents of the prior two groups.”

I can well understand the second and third types of people being incensed and seeking redress, using their righteous anger to drive the good work of TEN.

But those recipients? They have fed at the bird table where the crumbs scattered by the State were once loaves provided by men’s toil. I hate the phrase ‘custodial parents’; it smacks of jailers. It is they who have taken children into their ‘custody’ and deprived them the bread-winner, the loaf maker, (usually) the father, using the harsh State meachine that crumbles the social as well as the family daily bread.

Are these disaffected ‘custodial’ parents those whose grass proved less green than they had imagined? Whose crumbs from the beaurocrats loaf-crushing machine proved too little and stale? Are they counted amongst the 80% of women who initiate divorce at whim?

Is their interest and angst driven by loss of entitlement or from a rage at the wickedness of the system they sought, demanded and supported?

It is a terrible irony for someone who readily breaks up their family and casts a ‘non-custodial’ ex-loved one into pergatory and sometimes hell itself and corruptly taking that ex-loved one’s loaf and children with them, to find that other people are taking a cut of the stolen goods.

I applaude what TEN has shown us so far. What a powerful shout it is making. But what is it shouting? For whom? To what end?

Perhaps some essay here about TEN and its composition, its aims, its direction, would be useful to we who are astonished by its revalatory work. Greshams law affects not just money supply, but Groups of people too.