There’s no better way to destroy modern civilization than to politicize science. Of course it can be argued that there’s always “politics” in science anyway – but I think you know what I mean. The great global warming swindle is politisized science on the level of Lysenko in the Soviet Union and Mao’s total dictatorship in China. It leads quickly to economic tragedy and mass starvation.

Hansen said that there is currently enough oxygen in the atmosphere to allow fires to start “anywhere at any time.” “Make no mistake about it,” he continued. “This is absolute certain science.”

Al Gore followed with a dire warning of what this means to the planet. “Imagine if you will, fires ignite simultaneously around the globe, burning up the earth’s atmosphere completely, destroying the earth as we know it.”

Building on Hansen’s scientific certainty, Gore went on to say that “We know for with absolute certainty that this will happen within the next two decades unless we act immediately.” He went on to describe a broad international plan for controlling oxygen in the atmosphere, based primarily on his company’s willingness to sell expensive oxygen use tokens to everything that breaths.

As he left the podium, a reporter quickly asked Mr. Gore about the historical role of oxygen in sustaining life on the planet, to which Mr. Gore responded, “The debate is over.”

Tom … (should have noticed “of covent garden” earlier) …

I think it might be interesting if you check with SVT

http://svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=81959&lid=Adresser&from=menu

They have a number of debate programs and might find your documentary an interesting place to start – since it involves their political current events and issues. They also have space for documentaries. The debate programs might be able to use the documentary even if it’s already available on the internet.

I haven’t done an internet release of a documentary myself, but you could probably talk MND into posting it if you’re just looking for a place. MND would hope that it pulled visitors to the site.

Do you have a marketing program / budget for release?

http://svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=81959&lid=Adresser&from=menu

It’s going to be an internet release, although where, I haven’t yet thought. Any suggestions anyone? It would be nice to get some Swedes watching, and some female gender people, and some antifeminists, and the normal bridge and tunnel 9 to 5 types, who hate gender, and hate environmentalism for instance, so any suggestions, sincerely appreciated.

Those spots are monster storms…kind of like super-hurricanes…and are an indication of…wait for it…Global Warming.

I guess those citizens of Jupiter better give up their SUV’s and start driving Priuses.

Also for those of you who are counting that makes evidence of global warming which has been detected on five planetary bodies orbiting our sun, besides our own.

The Sun…gee I wonder if the Sun could have anything to do with global warming.

I guess once again the “Brilliant” minds who gave Albert Gore, Jr. his Nobel prize would be feeling really stupid if they weren’t Liberals and living in denial.

Anthropogenic Global Warming, what a brilliant scam. Al Gore has made $tens of million off of it. Just think of all the “Einsteins” on the Left who have actually bought this drek.

One of the weird things is the over-representation of artistic types who serve as Wikipedia editors. You get full coverage of movies, books, biographies of rock stars and actors (although I find comments on amazon.com more informative when shopping). They infest scientific and policy issues as well – but obviously don’t have the knowledge and skills to be objective.

sigh

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/04/12/wikipedia-s-zealots-solomon.aspx

My article covers this idea of consensus quite clearly. GW zealots simply do not count those who disagree with them in their assessment of what the scientific community thinks. There are plenty of scientists who disagree wholeheartedly with the IPCC on many things, and would simply scoff at the propaganda on Wikipedia. GW is political now – and certainly government administrators have made statements in keeping with politics. But don’t be fooled – even a good many of those statements are very much NOT what the Wikipedia propagandists want you to believe.

BTW: There are many MND readers who are quite familiar with Wikipedia bias on political issues that involve a lot of money. Readers and writers at MND have battled Wikipedia activists on such subjects as child support and the fathers’ rights movement.