Comments on: UC Irvine Sends out ‘Safety Alert’ over ‘Sexual Assault,’ but Is It Warranted?

By: mruffolo

mruffolo — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:29:13 +0000

Along the same government-anti-male-warning-systems lines, the Amber Alert Program in Chicago now calls the father “a man who had a relationship with the mother.”

By: mruffolo

mruffolo — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:15:15 +0000

I took a class recently at a local college. There were only two guys of 21 students and the teacher was female.

After a few weeks of men bashing (the Spanish language also oppress women), there was only one guy left in class â€“ me.

If I were a betting man, I would bet my milk money that the men college graduation rate of 40% is exaggerated.

By: jjtaup

jjtaup — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:36:25 +0000

As we all know, the universities are leftist paradises. They control all modes of communication and expression with an iron fist.

At UCI, propaganda emails from “the office of…” are routinely sent to faculty and staff with palpable feminist/homosexual/leftist biases. Additionally, offerings of scholarships based upon sex, sexuality, sexual orientation, sexual preference, race, color, creed, and ear wax are routinely put in your face, baby. In my book that draws from the same well as does racism and sexism, but universities do it as a matter of ho-hum course, and proudly so.

A program there called ADVANCE is nothing but a sexist machine used to inculcate the notion that poor, poor ouimyn are discriminated against in the sciences, especially mathematics. That has to be the answer for why the numbers don’t match. Don’t dare suggest otherwise. The solution: Just up the quota and lower the standards baby! It’s only fair.

By: The Man On The Street

The Man On The Street — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:49:34 +0000

Reads like a cheesy after school special or PSA than an actual incident…. but hey! She said so, so it MUST be all true!

TMOTS

By: jjtaup

jjtaup — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:58:32 +0000

Ahhh, good old UCI of ADVANCE fame, whereby glands above the waste = goooood, glands below = baaaad. I detest the sexist, racist, and socialist aspects of my alma mater as much as the next man and will celebrate the day the Muslim Student Association has its way with the mean clip-haired lesbians at the helm of the Office of Perversity.

Nonetheless, if Person A detains Person B and attempts to do things to Person B’s body and belongings that Person B has made apparent he does not wish, then Person A is guilty of some crime. Assault? Unlawful detention? I don’t know what they call it, but I’m pretty sure that’s not legal. I’m talking more than words here.

My guess is that’s probably not what happened, and that the girl either allowed or was ambiguous about Danny’s gropings. She wasn’t talking to Danny about condensed matter physics. Her word against his (unless there’s blood, bruises, rips, or other evidence), in which case Danny is presumed innocent.

My best guess is that there was no evidence. Therefore this should not be called an assault.