<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama, Lay Off Black Fathers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:10:39 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger F. Gay</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63899</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger F. Gay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63899</guid>
		<description>mruffolo:

Nice job. It will be great if he (and McCain) can be confronted on this issue. It needs to be part of the debate. It also needs to be connected to the destruction of the institution in a legal sense / i.e. rise of same-sex marriage in place of the actual established institutions marriage and family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mruffolo:</p>
<p>Nice job. It will be great if he (and McCain) can be confronted on this issue. It needs to be part of the debate. It also needs to be connected to the destruction of the institution in a legal sense / i.e. rise of same-sex marriage in place of the actual established institutions marriage and family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mruffolo</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63842</link>
		<dc:creator>mruffolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63842</guid>
		<description>Yesterday, I mailed a letter to Obama, my Senator, that helps explain why men appear to be irresponsible in family matters.

I also enclosed a copy of Baskerville&#039;s &quot;Taken Into Custody&quot;.  This book takes an accurate snapshot of the persecution of fathers by the government.

Obama embraces feminist social message, for example, instead of honoring fathers, like everyone honors mothers on Mother&#039;s Day, Obama blames fathers on Father&#039;s Day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I mailed a letter to Obama, my Senator, that helps explain why men appear to be irresponsible in family matters.</p>
<p>I also enclosed a copy of Baskerville&#8217;s &#8220;Taken Into Custody&#8221;.  This book takes an accurate snapshot of the persecution of fathers by the government.</p>
<p>Obama embraces feminist social message, for example, instead of honoring fathers, like everyone honors mothers on Mother&#8217;s Day, Obama blames fathers on Father&#8217;s Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panic</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63835</link>
		<dc:creator>panic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63835</guid>
		<description>higher number of black children who live in one-parent households?

Then why has the rate gone up dramatically since 1960, as ever more untold billions in public funds are spent in the black community?
When you continue apply a remedy which augments the very symptom you wish to alleviate - you&#039;re profiting from it.

This will cease when the public&#039;s tolerance for bastardy subsidized by taxes (the only black growth industry) is exhausted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>higher number of black children who live in one-parent households?</p>
<p>Then why has the rate gone up dramatically since 1960, as ever more untold billions in public funds are spent in the black community?<br />
When you continue apply a remedy which augments the very symptom you wish to alleviate &#8211; you&#8217;re profiting from it.</p>
<p>This will cease when the public&#8217;s tolerance for bastardy subsidized by taxes (the only black growth industry) is exhausted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poiuyt</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63816</link>
		<dc:creator>poiuyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63816</guid>
		<description>It looks as if this chauvenist dummy is shaping up, as just another leading male, not unlike McCain, whom will spend his every moment cogitating, on just how much more to profit females at the expense of the rest of society. That is profiting females and their daughters, at the expense of males and their sons, whilst glibbly promising, a non-existent or intended &quot;change&quot; out of his anus.

Look here Obama, you need to seriously look in the mirror for the sources and causes of fatherlessness in society, and the social problems that evolve as a consequence. Fatherlessness, at the behest of radical females, is a state manufactured phenomena, which the likes of you and other leading males have created and perpetuated for personal profit. 

You and others of your kind in authority, have maliciously created and incentivised fatherlessness and bastardy, with the object of generating a perpetual and running excuse for social intervention. An intervention which you and others claim, is for the protection of women and children, but is actually an extortion racket, targetting men, their property and income. 

Where would you and other state mongers be today, if you were not so freely able to intrude into other mens homes and families, in order to deliver from evils you created, their wives and kids ? Yourself, other lawyers and male politicians like you, would have then had to find some real productive work with which to sustain yourselves and your egos.

Having intruded into other mens homes and relationships, as would-be saviours of women, you&#039;ve gone on to encourge them in baseless arguments and disputes over mens income, children and property. Income, children and property they would have had no claims to, in the absence of males and their children in the home. ... Or income, children and property they even wouldnt have been able to acheive for themselves, if left alone to achieve it, unaided by men and children as stooges. 

You filthy cheek you.... Yourself and other leading males of the land have dirty minds, are willing to sell-out other men and their sons for nothing, and will stoop to spilling any self-serving propaganda/bilge to acheive this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks as if this chauvenist dummy is shaping up, as just another leading male, not unlike McCain, whom will spend his every moment cogitating, on just how much more to profit females at the expense of the rest of society. That is profiting females and their daughters, at the expense of males and their sons, whilst glibbly promising, a non-existent or intended &#8220;change&#8221; out of his anus.</p>
<p>Look here Obama, you need to seriously look in the mirror for the sources and causes of fatherlessness in society, and the social problems that evolve as a consequence. Fatherlessness, at the behest of radical females, is a state manufactured phenomena, which the likes of you and other leading males have created and perpetuated for personal profit. </p>
<p>You and others of your kind in authority, have maliciously created and incentivised fatherlessness and bastardy, with the object of generating a perpetual and running excuse for social intervention. An intervention which you and others claim, is for the protection of women and children, but is actually an extortion racket, targetting men, their property and income. </p>
<p>Where would you and other state mongers be today, if you were not so freely able to intrude into other mens homes and families, in order to deliver from evils you created, their wives and kids ? Yourself, other lawyers and male politicians like you, would have then had to find some real productive work with which to sustain yourselves and your egos.</p>
<p>Having intruded into other mens homes and relationships, as would-be saviours of women, you&#8217;ve gone on to encourge them in baseless arguments and disputes over mens income, children and property. Income, children and property they would have had no claims to, in the absence of males and their children in the home. &#8230; Or income, children and property they even wouldnt have been able to acheive for themselves, if left alone to achieve it, unaided by men and children as stooges. </p>
<p>You filthy cheek you&#8230;. Yourself and other leading males of the land have dirty minds, are willing to sell-out other men and their sons for nothing, and will stoop to spilling any self-serving propaganda/bilge to acheive this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lieweary</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63815</link>
		<dc:creator>lieweary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63815</guid>
		<description>&quot;The reason is NOT poverty; poverty is the result of the reason, which is Black women, abetted by the State, rejecting their men as husbands and fathers.&quot;

The state has provided women with every incentive to become single mothers, while simultaneously eliminating any incentive for men to marry and be responsible fathers. Husbands and fathers, who used to be our leaders and rolemodels, are now scapegoats and objects of exploitation. The results are obvious, especially for the African-American community. But there are some people in power who want African-Americans to remain a permanent underclass, and anti-father, anti-family policies are the way to accomplish that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The reason is NOT poverty; poverty is the result of the reason, which is Black women, abetted by the State, rejecting their men as husbands and fathers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The state has provided women with every incentive to become single mothers, while simultaneously eliminating any incentive for men to marry and be responsible fathers. Husbands and fathers, who used to be our leaders and rolemodels, are now scapegoats and objects of exploitation. The results are obvious, especially for the African-American community. But there are some people in power who want African-Americans to remain a permanent underclass, and anti-father, anti-family policies are the way to accomplish that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FathersHaveNaturalRights</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63813</link>
		<dc:creator>FathersHaveNaturalRights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63813</guid>
		<description>Barack Obama and many other politicians repeatedly claim that fathers are voluntarily walking away from their children.

But The State doesn&#039;t treat never married fathers respectfully as parents deserving equal custody rights.

Instead it treats them as &quot;providers&quot;, which is a euphemism for casting fathers as wallets and nothing more.

For The State to tell never married fathers that they have no right to raise their children is killing civilization, because civilization is best defined as &quot;men building for the future due to their stake in that future, a stake which exists to the extent that they have the opportunity to live as fully involved fathers of that future&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama and many other politicians repeatedly claim that fathers are voluntarily walking away from their children.</p>
<p>But The State doesn&#8217;t treat never married fathers respectfully as parents deserving equal custody rights.</p>
<p>Instead it treats them as &#8220;providers&#8221;, which is a euphemism for casting fathers as wallets and nothing more.</p>
<p>For The State to tell never married fathers that they have no right to raise their children is killing civilization, because civilization is best defined as &#8220;men building for the future due to their stake in that future, a stake which exists to the extent that they have the opportunity to live as fully involved fathers of that future&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emarel</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63812</link>
		<dc:creator>emarel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63812</guid>
		<description>&quot;This points to the single greatest reason for the higher number of black children who live in one-parent households. That reason is poverty. A 2007 study noted that a black fatherâ€™s ability to financially contribute the majoor support in the home is the major determinant of whether he remains in the home. Thatâ€™s no surprise considering that despite changing gender values and emphasis society still dumps the expectation and burden on men to be the principal breadwinner and financial provider. Put bluntly, men and the notion of manhood are still mainly defined by their ability to bring home the bacon. A man who falls short of that standard is considered a failure and loser.&quot;

The reason is NOT poverty; poverty is the result of the reason, which is Black women, abetted by the State, rejecting their men as husbands and fathers. Black men who have been disenfranchised from their roles as husband and father in the family have lost their main incentive to work, which has resulted in a couple generations now of jobless, unmotivated and violent men who act and are treated as nothing more than studs. The resultant single mother headed families, sucking at the government tit, are characterized by poverty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This points to the single greatest reason for the higher number of black children who live in one-parent households. That reason is poverty. A 2007 study noted that a black fatherâ€™s ability to financially contribute the majoor support in the home is the major determinant of whether he remains in the home. Thatâ€™s no surprise considering that despite changing gender values and emphasis society still dumps the expectation and burden on men to be the principal breadwinner and financial provider. Put bluntly, men and the notion of manhood are still mainly defined by their ability to bring home the bacon. A man who falls short of that standard is considered a failure and loser.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reason is NOT poverty; poverty is the result of the reason, which is Black women, abetted by the State, rejecting their men as husbands and fathers. Black men who have been disenfranchised from their roles as husband and father in the family have lost their main incentive to work, which has resulted in a couple generations now of jobless, unmotivated and violent men who act and are treated as nothing more than studs. The resultant single mother headed families, sucking at the government tit, are characterized by poverty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger F. Gay</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63811</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger F. Gay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63811</guid>
		<description>The anti-father campaign, started by Reagan and certainly a thinly veiled play of the race card (irresponsible welfare dependent black people) - &quot;How ironic that Republican politics put a Democrat in a position to so easily trump the &#039;conservative values&#039; card.&quot; And how ironic that this race card is so easily played by a black man.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/24/looks-bad-for-republicans/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anti-father campaign, started by Reagan and certainly a thinly veiled play of the race card (irresponsible welfare dependent black people) &#8211; &#8220;How ironic that Republican politics put a Democrat in a position to so easily trump the &#8216;conservative values&#8217; card.&#8221; And how ironic that this race card is so easily played by a black man.</p>
<p><a href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/24/looks-bad-for-republicans/" rel="nofollow">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/01/24/looks-bad-for-republicans/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lieweary</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/17/obama-lay-off-black-fathers/comment-page-1/#comment-63806</link>
		<dc:creator>lieweary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80130#comment-63806</guid>
		<description>In family court, a man is treated as a loser and a failure even if he does bring home the bacon. Over 70% of divorces are filed by women, not men, but Obama will never commit political suicide by criticizing women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In family court, a man is treated as a loser and a failure even if he does bring home the bacon. Over 70% of divorces are filed by women, not men, but Obama will never commit political suicide by criticizing women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
