Comments on: Why did Obama bash dads on Father’s Day?

By: mruffolo

mruffolo — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:58:27 +0000

I discovered I had no rights when the government took my son, 18 years of income, my property, and certain liberties, though I was legally innocent.

By: lieweary

lieweary — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:31:31 +0000

Men need to realize that they are the minority, with both fewer votes and fewer rights.

By: Patschef

Patschef — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:21:44 +0000

Minorities loves their victims status. They receives privileges. The term victim is often used and designed to persuade us that if you are black or woman or gay or whatever suit you, supposedly, it as to be redressed. So, Obama won’t talk about blacks to force you to believe that discrimination still is an issue in that minority (he wants to be elected, of course), unstead he is playing the women’s card…
In France, women and arabs loves their victims status ! Even knowing that one day they probably will enjoy it more under theirs burkas… (just kidding)
As long as the so called minorities gains from lies…they will continues to do so !
patschef
http://masculinisme.blog-city.com/

By: mruffolo

mruffolo — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:51:02 +0000

Not-for-profit feminist organization flush with cash – revenue of $1b last year.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121417762585295459.html?mod=hpp_us_pageone

No word if women are required by law to seek permission from fathers.

By: NOWMEN.NET

NOWMEN.NET — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:39:10 +0000

It’s simple if men Don’t fight for the their rights…they deserve none.

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 02:14:40 +0000

lieweary (10)
You told the sad truth, even though many men are unviling to accept the reality. We will continue our bravado plans, blamed by other men for being timid, but after 30 some years of ignoring reality, we have had our Wateerloo
Here is one issue men ignored, Title IX of Education Amendments of 1972. Cohen vs Brown Univ. “proportionality” ruling has cut men’s collegiate sports to the bone. Also, a female coach reportedly accepted $9 million settlement of nearly $20 million award for Title IX violation.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/womensbasketball/wac/2008-06-18-fresno-state-suit_N.htm

By: lieweary

lieweary — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:20:44 +0000

Why? Because men in this country don’t fight for their common interests. Women look out for themselves and each other and men don’t.

Blame feminism all you want, but feminists are going to walk all over men so long as men allow them to.

By: Robert Stevens

Robert Stevens — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:27:42 +0000

Well Obama is a democrat, nough said. they always pander to feminist and the left. They, politicians, disrespect fathers, because not one of them has lost his cushy little job for doing it!
If fathers and mens stand up united and say We will either vote for any politician who votes for rights for fathers and men and will vote against any politician who votes against fathers and men. Soon they will be pandering to us, ie fathers and men!
So, they ,politicians don’t fear disrespecting us, once they can loose those cushy little jobs and end up out of office in shame, they will stop doing it.
Oh, we will have to do this in mass, we will have to out vote, out finance and out shout, the feminist, the liberals and the other sacred cow groups who think they should have rights that come at our expense. Once word deadbeatbecomes he “D” word and a politician dare not use it , then that will be something!
You will see change come, So Obamie, if change is what you are after, look no further than your local father/mens rights group, because brother change is what we are after! And we will get it!

By: khankrumthebulgar

khankrumthebulgar — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:10:42 +0000

Obama is desperately trying to get Hilliary’s base of Boomer and Feminist Women to support his run for President. He is dissing Men to pander to them. And at the rate he is going, will insure a McCain Presidency. It is a formula for disaster. He should instead take an even handed approach. As Democratic Women in the end will vote more likely for a Democratic Candidate. And White Men are the second largest Voting block.

Once elected he will do as he wishes. Once in Power he will pursue an agenda based on his political and idealogical beliefs. His task is to get elected. He won the nomination now he must win the election. Catering to te FemBots will not get the Men’s vote.

By: amfortas

amfortas — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:38:36 +0000

Friggin’ Typos ! No edit function. My apologies.

By: amfortas

amfortas — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:35:59 +0000

Why does Obama say that? Its from the song-book. It’s the same song sang by every lazy, intellectual-vacuum politician across the western world. The space between the ears and their heart is filled to overflowing with hypocricy.

If the people here, regular readers and contributors to MND, no mere conspiracy nuts and 10th grade readers can see what is plain as their noses, one is left with only too alternative options for Politicians. They are either thik and stupid, blind and idle, or they are the conspirators, joined in a concerted effort to dismantle the family and dispossess men of their rights and wealth and influence.

Ok, both.

By: DcFather

DcFather — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:08:12 +0000

Before government tries to make an unwilling father be a father to his children, the government ought to let willing fathers be fathers to their children.

Excellent line. But we could have only 1 willingly absent father and 1 million unwillingly absent fathers, yet McCain and especially Obama would only speak of the 1.

Why?

My belief is that it’s because both parties are beholding to the divorce industry, starting with the ABA, and Democrats in particular stand for nothing if not for maximizing dependence on government. Replacing fatherhood with government is a very effective way to grow that dependence.

Then there are American women, a large segment of whom have become so pathetic with entitlement that they can’t stand the truth, and would never vote for somebody who spoke it. Just yesterday I watched as a woman gaudily bashed her husband in public for several minutes, while he just took it. Finally, he offered a quip in retort, to which she responded with punitive bashing and claims of abuse. Sad and pathetic as she is, Obama will readily pander to her and her ilk. Besides, it’s the party line.

By: Roger F. Gay

Roger F. Gay — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:06:11 +0000

He’s trying to capture Hillary’s following. He’s a Democrat, so he’s not interested in votes from men anyway – he’ll get the dumbest of them. Of course, when the polls start showing that the majority of men are not interested in voting for Democrats, they’ll pretend that it’s positive news – they’re ranks are filled with a greater number of women. Feminists will be all over the MSM, claiming it means that there is something wrong with the grumpy old Republican men; thus assuring that they will get the dumb male vote as well (fewer males than Republicans).

The only reason that such a strategy can work for a political party is that they’re fishing for the stupid ones to begin with. They’ll pile on a whole range of stupid ideas, that don’t hold up to reality check when you’re looking into the basis of them – like Al Gore’s global warming scare, the idea that he can talk terrorists out of being terrorists, etc.

By: ninderthana

ninderthana — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:19:10 +0000

The reason why politicians treat men and fathers as fifth class citizens and the media ignores injustices against men and fathers, is that people like you vote for people like Obama.

You have no one to blame but yourselves. You are the ones
proping up the system that oppresses you.

By: Richard Miniter.com » Obama and Fathers

Richard Miniter.com » Obama and Fathers — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:58:42 +0000

[...] not everyone was happy with Obama’s brave words. Here is a thoughtful criticism of Obama, by an Obama supporter and men’s rights activist. Read | [...]

By: anti armchair generals

anti armchair generals — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:24:47 +0000

RDG
A female columnist makes a similar point as you

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.parker20jun20,0,4135931.story

PS One of your columns was published in the same newspaper earlier