Comments on: Manifold Dangers Of A Liberal Supreme Court http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/07/02/manifold-dangers-of-a-liberal-supreme-court/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:36:56 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: jjtaup http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/07/02/manifold-dangers-of-a-liberal-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-64261 jjtaup Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:56:42 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80287#comment-64261 I believe Thomas Jefferson was among the most vocal who saw the absolute foolishness in allowing the Supreme Court to be the final arbiter in deciding constitutionality. (Of course, as you pointed out, they didn't even cite this justification in Kennedy vs. Louisiana.) That power should never have been allowed to be in their hands, but rather in the hands of the congress, as mentally defective as it is.) I believe Thomas Jefferson was among the most vocal who saw the absolute foolishness in allowing the Supreme Court to be the final arbiter in deciding constitutionality. (Of course, as you pointed out, they didn’t even cite this justification in Kennedy vs. Louisiana.) That power should never have been allowed to be in their hands, but rather in the hands of the congress, as mentally defective as it is.)

]]> By: Roger F. Gay http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/07/02/manifold-dangers-of-a-liberal-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-64250 Roger F. Gay Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:57:19 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80287#comment-64250 The USSC has turned its back on the Bill of Rights. Neither party is for it. It would take court appointments from a president in a third party, one that's serious about Constitutional enforcement, to have any positive effect on the courts. The USSC has turned its back on the Bill of Rights. Neither party is for it. It would take court appointments from a president in a third party, one that’s serious about Constitutional enforcement, to have any positive effect on the courts.

]]> By: Denis http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/07/02/manifold-dangers-of-a-liberal-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-64246 Denis Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:28:45 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=80287#comment-64246 "All that is needed for the dictator to endure is the presumption among the underlings that the leader does indeed hold a monopoly of power." (sounds like the attitude of American men in relation to the Gynocracy they live in and accept every day) The direction of the courts is disturbing. Equally disturbing is that it was Republican appointees that have lead the way for the Supreme Court to follow a direction away from the Constitution. 5-4 is a very narrow margin when deciding on the citizens right to bear arms. Have these 4 justices really studied the U.S. Constitution? Have the justices read the Geneva Convention? Do they know the requirements for "soldiers" and that terrorists fighting for an idealogy and not a country-terrorists without uniform-do not fall under the definition of "soldier" and therefore have no claim to rights as a soldier? In Massachusetts, and now California, marriage has been replaced by a new meaning (thereby vanquishing the original meaning) by a right created from whole cloth-a right that exists nowhere. The GOP has no spine-otherwise Ginsberg would have been "Borked". The GOP will get slammed this fall. The only thing that can give conservatives any sense of hope is that the two justices likely to retire under an Obama administration are two liberal ones who will simply be replaced by two different liberal ones. Break even. Un-surprising the GOP has again dropped the ball. Are there any conservatives left in the GOP? “All that is needed for the dictator to endure is the presumption among the underlings that the leader does indeed hold a monopoly of power.”

(sounds like the attitude of American men in relation to the Gynocracy they live in and accept every day)

The direction of the courts is disturbing. Equally disturbing is that it was Republican appointees that have lead the way for the Supreme Court to follow a direction away from the Constitution. 5-4 is a very narrow margin when deciding on the citizens right to bear arms. Have these 4 justices really studied the U.S. Constitution?

Have the justices read the Geneva Convention? Do they know the requirements for “soldiers” and that terrorists fighting for an idealogy and not a country-terrorists without uniform-do not fall under the definition of “soldier” and therefore have no claim to rights as a soldier?

In Massachusetts, and now California, marriage has been replaced by a new meaning (thereby vanquishing the original meaning) by a right created from whole cloth-a right that exists nowhere.

The GOP has no spine-otherwise Ginsberg would have been “Borked”.

The GOP will get slammed this fall.

The only thing that can give conservatives any sense of hope is that the two justices likely to retire under an Obama administration are two liberal ones who will simply be replaced by two different liberal ones. Break even.

Un-surprising the GOP has again dropped the ball.

Are there any conservatives left in the GOP?

]]>