Find the wrong one and you’ll be lucky if you’re even able to stand after she’s finished with you.

And the men never change. Currently a poll on Fox News concerning a debate Marc Rudov had recently concerning this topic shows Marc leading by 51% to 49%. A lousy 2% margin!!

If you give a damn go to:

http://www.foxnews.com/yourworld/index.html

And vote.

Warner-please do clarify here.

Are you saying this in reference to Muslim immigrants to the West?

Or about the West itself?

If it is the latter well-that is just too un-freaking-believable.

Please do clarify this point sir.

I have sympathy for good women. I like women – always have. Not that I trust them anymore. They have to restore and regain that having so damaged it. And I too, like you, would like to see an end to the War.

You are one of the few voices in the MRM advocating marriage as a major platform. You are a Men’s Advocate of Premier standing and rightly so by achievement. We all listen to what you have to say.

We all have different ‘accomodation’ experiences with feminism. Some of us are rigourously antagonistic and some less so. WTH and your good self differ from one another, as do I. It is a broad ‘church’ and we bring different strengths.

The fact that both men and women benefit from marriage is, to me, gainsaid and I concur with much in the book by Richard Driscoll, reviewed on MND currently by Steven Svoboda.

That said, reconstructing marriage as a worthwhile relationship and an Institution after such carnage and destruction has been caused will take the equivalent of a Marshall Plan. What will eventuate, should your wishes for marriage occur, will have very different architecture, yet-to-be-designed major structures, quite different arterials and a whole new specification for construction. It would have to start with a dismantling of arms of Government and the ‘earthworks’ alone would bury Family Law. There would necessarily be many casualties in current ‘Industries’.

If we go back to what marriage was before feminism, it will be ‘Theme Park’, erzatz, and just as uncomfortable, dangerous and exploitative of men as it was before.

I ended my last comment with – “Its funny how WTH’s words made me care for a moment, and yours had the opposite effect.”

That was to say, WTH showed ‘care’ for women’s plight, where it is indeed oppressed, and I responded to that. A feeling. I sometimes get tired of ‘putting an arm around women’ and often get stick for doing just that from other MRAs, and his words – even though perhaps ‘hyperbolic’- blew onto darkening coals. Your words made me think. Your words, articles and essays always do, even if I sometimes do not agree wholeheartedly with them all or challenge some.

I am never offended by what you say, Sir, and hope my occasional challenges do not offend you either.

By the way, I hope you can see your way to voting for me in the comming Presidential election. I can promise quite confidently that you and I will see more eye to eye than you will with any other candidate.

http://www.dontmakehermad.com/media/video/politicians/amfortas2008.html

Vote #1 Amfortas. I can tell a feminist from a woman.

we must put our arm around women and point out that having a husband is still by far the best predictor of happiness and a decent life for them. Feminists spent 45 year convincing women they would do better “having to do it all” as heroic single mothers, as prostitutes and spinsters. All scientific evidence proves that feminists are wrong.

Too many conservatives, including Huston, hold a suicidal set of beliefs hating feminism while still practicing it to the letter. I have chased Huston around the block about this before. His reaction was defensive and angry — just like feminists do. There is no excuse for conservatives feminist mugwumps who complain loudly while being part of the problem.

There is no hope in Huston’s approach — he sends everyone right into the feminist swamp. There is hope in changing conservatives, one at a time, so they finally walk away from Klannish feminist beliefs. I have been doing this for years, and have seen great successes in the upper realms of think tanks.

There are lots of liberals who actually have a better understanding about why feminism is the problem, because they lived it themselves. But they are harder to change because they also have a lot of strange notions about the need for a huge welfare state and freewheeling divorce etc.

The hope is in challenging those who pretend to know it all — those who pontificate nonsense to the masses — those who lead the masses down the wrong road.

http://www.dontmakehermad.com/media/video/politicians/amfortas2008.html

Vote #1 Amfortas. Be in caring company.

And I applaud you bringing us back to the future and the prospect of restoring the staus of men.

Oh, and marriage.

But…. this – “Our job is to teach women that the average husband will care for and protect her far better than invisible feminist bureaucrats do.”

That is only half the job, if I might be so bold as to diverge from your chosen line. You are going to have to teach men too.

Men will want to know why on earth they should bother to ‘protect’ women. Or ‘care for’ them for that matter. After several generations of having any caring action belittled and calumnised, even legislated against complete with punishment for being thought to have tried, and an equal time being lectured that women can do anything a man can and better, what is in it for men to go back to being under-stairs servants?

The real future will have an entirely different ‘marriage’ than that past. I suggest that your time and erudition would be better spent defining a ‘New Marriage’ and trying to convince we men that it would be viable.

The irony in that ‘men at work’ sign issue is that as far as marriage is concerned, men have downed-tools and are having a strike meeting. They have walked off the job. They care not a whit for the hole in the middle of the road. Its a road with a sign saying “Women-only between 5 am and 11 pm”.

Its funny how WTH’s words made me care for a moment, and yours had the opposite effect.

Your point that feminists hate women is correct: they bait women into making all sorts of decisions that later hurt them.

However, your thinking is tragically feminist and off base too. Where on earth do you get the idea that “millions of young girls cower and allow themselves into forced marriages all across the west…”? That is a ridiculous feminist assertion straight from your lips.

Do you really believe that “Women are daily and by the millions beaten, raped, mutilated, and oppressed in uncountable ways by adherents of a so-called religion”? Sure, there is some of it going on perhaps in certain countries with repressive governments such as Burma, but it is not anything on the level of mass brutality you invent it to be in the Muslim religion.

We must NOT become a hysterical and polemical as those who hate us have become. You crossed the line twice in this piece. But you are not unusual in this regard: classic conservatives often hold feminist beliefs that end up poisoning anything they would do to restore marriage in America. If you truly want to change America, you need to start by extricating yourself from the feminist beliefs sending you down the feminist drain.

The fact of this world cultural collision is that feminists hate men, and muslim fanatics hate western feminism. Men in western countries are served up by the millions on the platter of radical feminism, and our men have to go defend our countries from whackos who hate feminism. Western men are getting it at both ends.

Our job is to restore marriage and the status of reasonable men to simply exist in America. Our job is to teach women that the average husband will care for and protect her far better than invisible feminist bureaucrats do.

Most women quickly come to understand that feminism has hurt them tremendously. If we simply speak intelligently to them we can change America for the better.

Because they know their enemies, and their limits…They know that American and Western men are so trained and are such pussies that they can hammer them without fear of repercussion. And they also know that, should they ever start this shit with Muslim men, they’d get their throats cut, and otherwise have a hell unleashed on them that they’ve not ever experienced, and don’t ever want to see.

InvestCLUB for Women
http://www.investclubforwomen.com

For example, the movie Pretty Woman ought to be changed along with Women’s Day Magazine, Bionic Woman TV show, “woman” in the dictionary, the government’s Office of Women’s Business Ownership, The National Women’s Health Information Center, National Organization for Women, Women for Women International, women’s sports, women bathroom, among others.

Will a feminist campaign for equality?

Yet women get “equal pay” for their 3 sets….and much, MUCH less work.

Feminist math is a curious thing. Apparently, shouting and stomping your feet and pouting DOES make 3=5.

Practical reason: takes up too much space to say “Men working, and women exchanging recipes, texting, drying their nails, and doing their makeup”

Wait a second……a young woman was brutally killed? By a man who is part of an oppressive religion that continues to treat women as chattel? C’mon ladies….get your signs of protest and let’s make us some noise. We’ll teach them bastards to post those discriminatory road signs.