PA Top Cop Says Tasers Protect Public, Officers

2008-07-19
By

by Jim Kouri

(This article is based on a report submitted to the National Association of Chiefs of Police. The writer is the organization’s public information officer.)

The recent deployment of Tasers to State Police troopers for use in confrontational
situations is helping to ensure the safety of the public and officers themselves, Commissioner Jeffrey B. Miller said yesterday.

“Tasers already have proven to be highly effective, non-lethal weapons for subduing individuals threatening harm to themselves or others,” Miller said during a news conference at the State Police Academy in Hershey, PA.

“They have been used with great success to control people who are under the
influence of drugs or alcohol; suffering from mental health issues; or who simply are intent on harming themselves, our officers or others.

“In some of these cases, there is no doubt our troopers would have been required to grapple with the individuals, strike them with their batons, or fire their service weapons to protect themselves or others. The Taser provides an excellent option to the use of deadly force.”

Miller said Tasers have been used in a wide variety of circumstances, including the following situations:

— Two troopers in Clearfield County responded to a report of an
intoxicated man arguing with his elderly parents. The troopers found the
subject armed with a rifle, which he pointed at them. One of the troopers
fired his Taser and the man was taken into custody.

— Troopers in Cumberland County encountered a man armed with a knife
who was threatening suicide. When the man refused commands to drop the
knife, a trooper fired his Taser and the officers were able to disarm the
subject.

— Adult probation officers in Franklin County called State Police
seeking assistance with a suspect who had wrestled with them and fled on
foot. A trooper found the man, who was carrying a glass bottle. When the
man ignored the trooper’s commands and tried to run away, the trooper used
his Taser and took the suspect into custody.

Taser is the brand name of an electronic immobilization device, or EID, that fires two darts attached to wires. The device delivers a 50,000-volt charge, incapacitating an individual long enough for troopers to take the person into custody without causing permanent harm to the individual.

Miller said State Police conducted a two-year study of the possible use of EIDs and initiated a pilot program in 2006 by providing Tasers to 18 officers statewide.

Based on results of that program, Miller said, State Police this year began training and equipping 3,000 troopers with Taser X26 model devices made by Taser International Inc. of Scottsdale, Ariz. The Tasers, which cost $899 per unit, were purchased primarily with asset forfeiture funds.

Miller said troopers used their Tasers 144 times during the first six months of this year.

“The response from troopers in the field has been completely positive,” Miller said.

“One of the key reasons is that using Tasers means it’s much less likely that an officer will become involved in a physical confrontation that could result in injuries to the suspect or the officer.”

Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he’s a staff writer for the New Media Alliance (thenma.org). In addition, he’s the new editor for the House Conservatives Fund’s weblog. Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.

He’s former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed “Crack City” by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He’s also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He’s a news writer for TheConservativeVoice.Com and PHXnews.com. He’s also a columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he’s syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. He’s appeared as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc. His book Assume The Position is available at Amazon.Com. Kouri’s own website is located at http://jimkouri.us

   

99 views

  • KushinLos

    Okay, so the first and third examples I can see why the officers would use the Tasers, there is definitely a reason and I will not fault them for their actions. The second case though, the man was a danger to himself only and while we can argue all day about whether an individual has the right to end his life or not, being a danger only to himself I see little reason to taser him. If he waited long enough for the officers to arrive it could be he was only looking for attention or desiring to be stopped and at least in hindsight I would say tasering him when he was the only one in harms way and it was he who was the one causing the harm, well the way I see it he was seeking his suicide much quicker than a smoker or alcohol abuser does.

    And I wouldn’t stand in the way of either one of those causes of death either, their bodies after all.

  • DrDamage

    I find it difficult to fault police officers for tazering a man brandishing a knife in a public place. It’s one thing to keep and bear arms, quite another to brandish arms, yes?

    More to the point, what guarantee is there that this unbalanced fellow was not going to harm another member of the public? The police can’t very well be expected to spend their time keeping the public clear of disturbed folks who are armed when it’s quicker just to arrest them and put them in the custody of mental health services

  • panic

    Primary target for Taser use: anyone who annoys them.
    Primary reason for Taser use: it’s fun!






Search