<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain, Obama campaigns discovered making questionable edits to Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/08/26/mccain-obama-campaigns-discovered-making-questionable-edits-to-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/08/26/mccain-obama-campaigns-discovered-making-questionable-edits-to-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:37:06 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dresden - Page 2 - War relics forum- Military history. WW1 and WW2 military collecting, relics, archeology</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/08/26/mccain-obama-campaigns-discovered-making-questionable-edits-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-68605</link>
		<dc:creator>Dresden - Page 2 - War relics forum- Military history. WW1 and WW2 military collecting, relics, archeology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=81124#comment-68605</guid>
		<description>[...] we use their information. For example …look at what both the Obama and McCaine Campaign Staff did – McCain, Obama campaigns discovered making questionable edits to Wikipedia &#124; MND: Your Daily Dose of ...   Another – “Wikipedia bills itself as the web&#039;s &quot;free encyclopedia that anyone can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we use their information. For example …look at what both the Obama and McCaine Campaign Staff did – McCain, Obama campaigns discovered making questionable edits to Wikipedia | MND: Your Daily Dose of &#8230;   Another – “Wikipedia bills itself as the web&#8217;s &quot;free encyclopedia that anyone can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger F. Gay</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/08/26/mccain-obama-campaigns-discovered-making-questionable-edits-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-65475</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger F. Gay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=81124#comment-65475</guid>
		<description>I stopped reading this article when it described stating information similar to information in Wikipedia as plagerism and am not going to use any more brain energy to process any of the information further. Wikipedia has the intent of providing information for use - you can copy-paste and use it at will, including images. (I&#039;m not recommending blind use of Wikipedia material, just stating Wikipedia&#039;s own intended use.) Attribution is not required. Further, Wikipedia editors are required to use external sources for their material meaning that it all came from somewhere else to begin with.

The best thing for Wikipedia to claim is that McCain agrees with them. But I&#039;m not sure I see that possibility in the attitude of the authors. A little biased maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped reading this article when it described stating information similar to information in Wikipedia as plagerism and am not going to use any more brain energy to process any of the information further. Wikipedia has the intent of providing information for use &#8211; you can copy-paste and use it at will, including images. (I&#8217;m not recommending blind use of Wikipedia material, just stating Wikipedia&#8217;s own intended use.) Attribution is not required. Further, Wikipedia editors are required to use external sources for their material meaning that it all came from somewhere else to begin with.</p>
<p>The best thing for Wikipedia to claim is that McCain agrees with them. But I&#8217;m not sure I see that possibility in the attitude of the authors. A little biased maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHS can no longer use Wikipedia to deny asylum seekers &#8212; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/08/26/mccain-obama-campaigns-discovered-making-questionable-edits-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-65460</link>
		<dc:creator>DHS can no longer use Wikipedia to deny asylum seekers &#8212; TechWag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=81124#comment-65460</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia is just not the authoritative system that many people would like to believe it is. While much of it can be user edited, the whole process of editing has become much more like a political process, like the scrubbing of Paulins data before the republican national convention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia is just not the authoritative system that many people would like to believe it is. While much of it can be user edited, the whole process of editing has become much more like a political process, like the scrubbing of Paulins data before the republican national convention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
