lumigan tramadol tadalafil

The American Feminist Party on Palin

2008-09-21
By

Democrats have been on the war-path ever since Sarah Palin’s nomination was announced. Hillary Clinton’s record long campaign defeated, a stronger female figure quickly surpassed and supplanted her. In this age of identity politics, the race still involves a brown man and a women. And the woman thing: so far as they are concerned it happened on the wrong side. So much confusion. So much angst to sort out.

Examples of unbridled low-life hate speech provided by Daily News come from such intellectual giants as Rosie O’Donnell, South Carolina Democratic chairwoman Carol Fowler, recording artist Pink, Sandra Bernhard, Comedian Margaret Cho, Charles Rangel, Pamela Anderson, and Naomi Wolf.

Syracuse University “culture watcher” Bob Thompson puts his finger on the pulse. The reaction gets superheated when Palin critics get called sexist by the GOP. “It’s so confusing that it makes you rip your hair out in rage,” Thompson said. “How do Democrats not get mad when a party that has not been known for any kind of feminism suddenly now is in all these shouting matches on cable news playing the role of feminists?”

Confusing indeed, for a bunch of retarded partisan groupies who are deathly afraid of strong women. Oh, I don’t mean noisy brats with an over-charged sense of entitlement, immature half-wits who can’t wrap their tiny little brains around the benefits of western civilization, or bitter, potty-mouthed old drama queens out for revenge against all mankind for fill-in-the-blank declaring that all heterosexual activity is rape. They get along fine with those. I mean strong women.

It isn’t easy for a normal person to come to grips with the feelings of the extreme left. Professor of Femistology Wendy Doniger wrote of Governor Palin, “Her greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman.” (sic) That sort of comment naturally leaves many people scratching their heads in bewilderment. But feminists have spent decades confusing the terms “woman” and “feminist” (of their own sort). Saying Sarah Palin is not a women is – I guess everyone realizes now – code for Sarah Palin is not a screeching far-left, man-hating lesbian, western-civilization destroying, neo-nazi, baby-killing, fanatic feminist. The fact that they still want us to believe that’s a synonym for woman is solid testament to their iron will to force their ideology on others. “My way or” – or what? Sex change operation? Hormonal injections to keep non-believers in a constant state of menopause? PC Sensitivity classes to indoctrinate us to life as psychopathic idiots? Young children of heterosexual married couples forced to watch Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth?” (sic)

Let me relieve the confusion, for it is oh so easy. The Democratic Party is welcome to hold the status of The American Feminist Party. But that doesn’t make it the party of women or the party of men who care about women. NOW does not represent all women everywhere. The “gender gap” represents the party’s poor performance among men, and rightfully so. The party’s seething hatred of men, and their intentional destruction of the successful liberal civilization men and women poured their blood and sweat in to create, is not preferred by everyone. The Democratic Party – The American Feminist Party – the party on the extreme left, is able to fool some of the people some of the time. Sarah Palin is demonstrating what fools they really are.

1,265 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    Everybody has a right to an opinion. I think the push to get everyone to think and act the same way is a serious part of the problem. I support that whole freedom thing and believe couples would be better of if they understood they need to communicate with one another and make joint decisions – not look to the latest PC to figure out what they’re supposed to do. That doesn’t mean I’m endorsing or not endorsing something on the PC scale – it means I don’t think that’s where people should look for inspiration. It’s up to them, not some political special interest group, to figure out how they’re going to get through life. As for women working outside the home – they’ve always done that. Most women work because they need the money – and that includes married women. It’s continued to get worse for everyone, including married couples, since the 1960s. For most people – these working verses staying home questions are not a matter of political ideology.

    As for the abortion thing – the feminist will make that an issue in every presidential election year. If you’re going to debate them verses the Republican Party position, it’s important to know what it is:

    **************************”

    Faithful to the first guarantee of the Declaration of Independence, we assert the inherent dignity and sanctity of all human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution, and we endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children. We oppose using public revenues to promote or perform abortion and will not fund organizations which advocate it. We support the appointment of judges who respect traditional family values and the sanctity and dignity of innocent human life.

    We have made progress. The Supreme Court has upheld prohibitions against the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion. States are now permitted to extend health-care coverage to children before birth. And the Born Alive Infants Protection Act has become law; this law ensures that infants who are born alive during an abortion receive all treatment and care that is provided to all newborn infants and are not neglected and left to die. We must protect girls from exploitation and statutory rape through a parental notification requirement. We all have a moral obligation to assist, not to penalize, women struggling with the challenges of an unplanned pregnancy. At its core, abortion is a fundamental assault on the sanctity of innocent human life. Women deserve better than abortion. Every effort should be made to work with women considering abortion to enable and empower them to choose life. We salute those who provide them alternatives, including pregnancy care centers, and we take pride in the tremendous increase in adoptions that has followed Republican legislative initiatives.

    Respect for life requires efforts to include persons with disabilities in education, employment, the justice system, and civic participation. In keeping with that commitment, we oppose the non-consensual withholding of care or treatment from people with disabilities, as well as the elderly and infirm, just as we oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide, which endanger especially those on the margins of society. Because government should set a positive standard in hiring and contracting for the services of persons with disabilities, we need to update the statutory authority for the AbilityOne program, the main avenue by which those productive members of our society can offer high quality services at the best possible value.

  • Zorik

    My apologies Mr Gay; the MRA/FRA/MM is clearly worth supporting because we are fighting for a worthy cause. It’s just that I feel we have compromised somewhat on the true ideal (as I see it).

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    I don’t get the comments about FRA / MRA / MM “not worth supporting.” Why are some short comments by individuals being treated as if they represent an entire “movement?”

    There isn’t anyone here who’s defining the views of tens of millions of people who make up “the movement.” “The movement” is composed of a very large number of people who’s ideas on everything are all over the spectrum – just like the rest of the population.

    The only concept of one unifying “movement” from all of them, comes from the fact that there is an aggregate point source responsible for intensifying their misery – political corruption. It can be called a “movement” because they will have the tendency to act politically in ways that will reduce their misery (rational model).

    If you are looking for a more complete unifying world-view, you need to look at religion. FRA / MRA / MM are not religions or cults.

  • Zorik

    Denis said: “A product of the public school system”.

    What’s ironc is that I never went to a public school until I went to university. Until then I was in Catholic schools all my life.

    Denis said: “What we do know as fact is that the Catholic Church is the ONLY thing standing up against abortion…”

    Simply not true. They might be the biggest but far from the only. And the reason they are so big might have a lot to do with converting people by the sword.

    Denis said, “A mind is a terrible thing to waste.”

    I also went to church every week until age 16 or 17. They had their chance to indoctrinate me but they failed.

  • merck

    FathersHaveNaturalRights said,
    Merck:
    “I essentially agree with you.”
    ____________________________

    I think we’re saying essentially the same thing.

    In any case, the point I wanted to make is that the “vast majority” of Americans want restrictions on abortions at the very least. You would never know that by watching the six o’clock news.

    Also, if you are in the majority of Americans who want more restrictions on abortions then Barrack Hussein Obama is not the guy for you.

    This is the most important election in history to do something about abortion. If we miss this opportunity, then the left will appoint two or three pro-abortion members to the Supreme Court, (possibly Hillary Clinton as one of them) (very scary thought in my mind) and the death toll will continue to rise indefinitely.

    The media is downplaying the importance of abortion in this election.

    We shouldn’t let them get away with it.

  • FathersHaveNaturalRights

    Merck:

    I essentially agree with you.

    They conflate A+B and super-emphasize the “A” element while de-emphasizing the “B” element to make the whole A+B package look a whole lot like “A” alone would.

  • FathersHaveNaturalRights

    Zorik:

    I know what you meant and wanted to address the issue of consistency first.

    With regards to intensity of rhetoric, I guess I would say that I look at it in terms of at whom it is directed.

    Insulting something foul is acceptable.

    Insulting something good is not acceptable.

    I hope that clarifies my perspective.

  • Denis

    A product of the public school system:

    “Denis, what about all the other religious wars in Europe over the centuries? As I understand it, most were wars of liberation from the Catholic Church which tried to force its religion on others. If so, they are responsible for all those deaths too.”

    What we do know as fact is that the Catholic Church is the ONLY thing standing up against abortion and standing up for the 45 million souls murdered via abortion.

    I also know history. THAT would take some rather lengthy posting here on my part to educate. I would want to get paid for teaching the course.

    Sadly, you don’t “understand it”.

    A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

  • Zorik

    FathersHaveNaturalRights,

    I was not questioning the consistency of your position but the inconsistency of making denigrating remarks (like “knuckle dragging”) and then complaining when you feel other people make denigrating remarks about you.

  • merck

    FathersHaveNaturalRights said,

    “The mass media picks A+B consistently.”
    __________________________

    I have to disagree with you there.

    What I see them doing is taking A+B and reporting it as A.

  • FathersHaveNaturalRights

    Merck:

    In polls on abortion, there will be those who say:

    A) Abortion should be legal in all circumstances
    B) Abortion should be legal in some circumstances and illegal in some other circumstances
    C) Abortion should be illegal in all circumstances

    An apparent majority, for “Legal in all or some circumstances” OR for “Illegal in all or some circumstances” can be claimed by simply selectively conflating the results of A+B or B+C depending on how someone wants to portray the results.

    The mass media picks A+B consistently.

  • FathersHaveNaturalRights

    Zorik:

    My comment to Dabir Dalton at #35, “Get out of the stone age, stop dragging your knuckles on the ground, and stop harassing individuals who are doing what their individual strengths lead them to do without hurting anyone”, was referring to his obvious need to impose polarized ‘roles’ on men regardless of the individual abilities of any given man on whom such roles are imposed.

    The second comment of mine to which you referred was in objection to another’s denigrating characterization of fathers who stay at home and take care of their children.

    So in both cases, my consistent objection was to coercing fathers into polarized roles which are harmful to society:

    The first poster sought to do that by explicit prescription, notwithstanding his hypocritical proclamations in other posts that no one should impose their views on society.

    The second poster sought to do it more tangentially, via hyperbolic ridicule of fathers who follow the parenting from home path.

  • Zorik

    By the way, pre-feminazi feminism might be worth “supporting” as a stepping stone to setting the world right, but I wouldn’t want to stop there.

  • Zorik

    Dalton (#38) said: “A man’s primary focus is to provide for his family while his wife’s primary focus is the raising of their children during their early years…It has now become quite apparent that MRA’s and FRA’s are now becoming so identified with feminism that the MM isn’t worth supporting…”

    I’d have to agree that many of us have sunk to simply fighting for pre-feminazi feminism. What is the world coming to?

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    I say we should skip all over that and go straight to The Enlightenment. We already know how to do that. Second time should be easier.

  • Zorik

    FathersHaveNaturalRights,

    Why tell someone to “Get out of the stone age, stop dragging your knuckles on the ground…” (#35) and then complain about other people making “denigrating” (#45) remarks?

  • Zorik

    Denis, what about all the other religious wars in Europe over the centuries? As I understand it, most were wars of liberation from the Catholic Church which tried to force its religion on others. If so, they are responsible for all those deaths too.

  • Denis

    “millions of people were put to death in europe by the roman catholic church”

    WTF?!

    The Spanish Inquisition death toll is in the thousands. Some historians put it in the 10s of thousands and a few put the maximum at around 150,000.

    No informed, educated, credible source has ever said “millions”.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

  • JohnG

    Dabir Dalton said,

    Merck wrote: The people who have the power to legally do this are not above taking your life as well.
    _____________________

    Agreed…But then again during the middle ages millions of people were put to death in europe by the roman catholic church…My own view is that if the right wins the culture war they are just as capable of taking the lives of those who stand in their way…

    September 21, 2008 at 6:14 am

    Ridiculous. Cite your sources on that – I won’t hold my breath.

  • merck

    Another “misperception” about the abortion issue is the number of people in favor of unrestricted abortion. The left would have you believe that 65% of Americans favor unrestricted abortions and that is an out-n-out lie.

    According to the PEW research foundation most people don’t want Roe v Wade overturned outright, but they want the original intent of the ruling enforced. In other words, abortions should *only be allowed* in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. If that were the case the number of abortions would be greatly reduced from the current 1,500,000 a year.

    When you look at it from that prospective the numbers are reversed. In other words, 63% say abortion should be more limited, illegal except for rape, incest and to save the life of the mother, or banned altogether. Only 35 % believe abortion should be generally available.

    http://people-press.org/commentary/?analysisid=119

    The vast majority of Americans want far fewer abortions and that’s a good thing and a very positive step in the right direction.

    Unrestricted abortion is supported only by a handful of *extremist nutcases* who will eventually be exposed to everyone for the murdering hypocrites they’ve always been.

    Help make it happen. Urge everyone you know to vote for McCain/Palin.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    merck,

    You link to a 2000 blog and NPR. Is there anything from a credible source?

  • merck







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search