Daddy Activist Claims Family Court Lacks Due Process
“I made the sign saying STOP THE WAR ON FATHERHOOD,” stated Fisher, “I believe there is a war in this country against fathers. In my case the judge was biased.”
“I took my case all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court, and won. Then the family court judge made changes and decisions without a hearing,” says Fisher, “after five years of day on, day off, equal shared parenting, she reduced my time with my daughter.
Fisher says he never expected to find gender bias in family court, “I’m of the generation that grew up believing in equality. I was raised by a single mom. She taught me the genders are equal.” Fisher had been sharing his daughter’s care since she was an infant.
When reminded that feminist groups claim women are discriminated against in family court, Fisher suggested, “Fathers claim gender bias. Mothers claim gender bias. Let’s do an investigation and learn the truth.”
He recalls having a lot of time to think about things during those hours in the air. He said even though men are victims most often, it can happen to any parent. He clarified, “What drove me to go up on a crane was the obligation as an American to defend the Constitution. The Constitution guarantees us due process.”
paul and demetra playing monopoly
source: jugsforjustice.org
I'm a sun and nature loving, 50-something, laid back, forward thinking, liberal anti-feminist egalitarian, san francisco bay area native, single mom of 4 and yia yia to 2. I've been active in the equal parenting movement since 2002. Known as the purple Queen of Equality, I once blogged as the Feminist4Fathers. Find me now on sharedparentingworks.org and jugsforjustice.org. | More from Teri Stoddard

Stumble It!



October 2nd, 2008 at 10:06 am
Go to this link for Strickland:
http://governor.ohio.gov/AboutUs/AboutTed/tabid/55/Default.aspx
Excerpts:
“After Ted Strickland was first reelected to Congress, he placed a plaque in his office with the following quote from Scripture:”
““And what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?â€â€”Micah 6:8″
“Throughout his service as a minister, a psychologist, a professor and a Member of Congress, Ted worked to exemplify those simple, powerful words. That same plaque is now in the Governor’s Office, where those same words guide Ted each day.”
Give me a friggin’ break. Pleaaasse!
Well, if it isn’t the manginas who are against us it’s the chivalrists.
And there are idiots who write for this site who believe in a marriage movement?
Give me a friggin’ break. NOBODY in public office will fight for the rights, and for justice for men and fathers.
DO
NOT
MARRY
A society without fathers will collapse.
A society without men who will support a criminal system of government will collapse.
Let it all come crashing down.
October 4th, 2008 at 7:36 am
One does not need to be a “legal expert” to know that the GiSKERs( government sponsored kidnapping and extortion racket)are outlaws! They routinely violate the basic rights of parents,most notably fathers!
I started studying the legal system 5 years ago,( oct 2003) and have made some amazing and deeply troubling discoverys! First, the family courts are courts of equity, they don’t have to obey the constitution in any shape or form, suprize… surprize. Yea, anyone having anything to do with these corrupt bastards knows this!
But what most people don’t know and I had find out, is that this is their weakness. These courts of equity or more correctly, these “equity tribunals” operating under the colour of law, have to follow all the law,not just the parts they like! When these equity tribunals fail to follow all the law, ie due process, they lose something. That something is Subject Matter Jurisdiction. As I said, this is their weakness. The courts, as corrupt as they are, still have to follow the law and have ruled time and time again, a judgment of a court that was made where subject matter jurisdiction was lacking is a void and that judgment can be made to go away. This includes judgments for child support and child custody.
Now you have to understand something, the courts interceded in these cases because someone, ie usually the mom, asked them to. The court operates in the belief that a family break down has occured, which is true. Now here is the rub, Once the courts authority has been removed, ie by the filing of the proper challenge and the courts must bow out if Subject Matter Jurisdiction is lacking. Because of due process rules, this cause of action cannot be refiled on, but the state and the courts themselves, can refile as a seperate action. The way to prevent this is to, sit mom down, propose a private arrangement, one where you still have to take responsibility for you children, but this arrangement will restore you status as a parent, ie the state cannot impose their biased and unfair requirements on you. Now you do have to follow the law, but the law in its pure form, minus the corruption of the legal system, is quite fair and equitable. And once mom, understands that she no longer has the upper hand, she acts better, but it only works if you do what is right and do it consistantly.
You have to be more than a visitor and financial provider, although you will still do both. You have to demonstrate to mom and the courts, although they have been removed, that this arrangement works and the state and the courts have no cause of action to intercede and that if they do involve themselves again, they had better have followed the law to the letter and if they do so without that requirement, the feds will be getting involves. And the feds do follow the rules and will come down hard on state officials who violate the law and the rights of parents. Now if all this sound hard to do, yes, it is! But if you want the GiSKERS out of your business and you want you status as a parent back, and at present this the only thing that I have ever seen ,that actually works, this is what you have to do!
This will only be a temporary fix, once the GiSKERS wise up and do follow the rules this loop hole will disappear. But there are millions of cases where they screwed up and it will take years for them to fix it. In the mean time, we tear these evil bastards down as much as we can. Taking money, power and control away from them is the only way to beat them. By the time they, clean up their act, this God awful racket will be gone.
Civil rights laws will have been passed and enforced, this whole evil racket will be just some pages in a history book.
May 6th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Every man and woman that goes to family court knowns the Judges, Domestic Relations Officer (DRO) and the system is in favor of the woman. Many Judges and DRO's should be impeached since they violate the Oath by which they hold office. Preserve and protect the laws of the US Constitution. This means that all parties are entitled to equal protection under the law. Which men do not recieve. It is known by all parties that go to court and they general public. It is because everyone reconizes the trend. It is so obvious that it is a wonder how the family legal system remains in tact. Out right corruption supported by the tax payers.
The trends can easily be proved by statistical patterns. First depict a DRO or Judge known to be biased toward women. Show up in his or her court to collects statistics. Then start
impeachment proceedings.
The law is so subjective it's application is usually toward the desired outcome. Fathers and children always get the short end of the stick.