My previous article, “2008 Elections: Marriage-Absence, America’s Most Urgent Problem, Goes Ignoredâ€ÂÂ, points out what is wrong with Sarah Palin: she is a card-carrying big-government socialist feminist. McCain is no better for a variety of reasons discussed in previous articles [1], [2]. For the record, the Obama/Biden ticket reeks as well, for all the same reasons.
The Palin-Biden debate highlighted the vast disconnect between the Party and its core constituency. Both Biden and Palin agreed that same-sex marriage is not acceptable. This might sound excellent to political neophytes who don’t look under the hood before buying used cars.
The truth was outed when Biden promised undying support for every stripe of “same-sex benefits†for “same sex partnersâ€ÂÂ. Palin waffled on the issue and had no comment opposing it. Both Palin and Biden back undermining the social and legal institution of heterosexual marriage by replacing it with a secular wild-card: a civil marriage license entirely eviscerating the ecclesiastical value of marriage.
Be forewarned: when a marriage license allows any two humans to marry each other, regardless of sexual orientation, it is a prescription for replacement of heterosexual marriage with unisex marriage comprised of any two women. This is precisely why the National Organization for Women has been desperately battling for SSM since recognizing its penultimate feminist potential in the late 1970’s.
Feminists know that current law heavily entitles women to irresponsibly divorce and have children out of wedlock. Men are called deadbeats and thrown in jail to support this arrangement, which has already aborted over half of all marriages in America.
Feminists also know that when any two women can marry, they will command at least six sources of income: their own incomes, at least two child support orders, two sets of welfare entitlements, and plenty of alpha-troglodytes in Washington to make sure the arrangement between big government, trial lawyers, and feminists continues to run America into the dark ages.
Some imagine my prediction that same-sex marriage between heterosexual women will become widespread is absurd. May I point out that women will do whatever makes the most money. Six or more incomes are far better than two. You do the math.
Same-sex marriage would inevitably, over time, reduce America to a nation of predatory Constitutional polyandry. The average woman would garner the total sexual liberation feminists long demanded, and could sleep around with every hot stud that catches her eye at everyone else’s expense – simply by “marrying†another woman.
Feminists and an impossible coalition of disillusioned Christians, conservatives, liberals improperly blame men for both the divorce and illegitimacy revolutions. Let everyone finally understand that it is not men who “forget†to take birth control pills or misrepresent use of other invisible forms of birth control. Let everyone understand that feminists demanded the divorce revolution, not the good men of America.
The blind majority could only be right if half the men in America are the violent, irresponsible animals that feminists pretend we are. They are vastly wrong – their beliefs making them docile servants of radical-feminist evil.
A lot of folks thought that the divorce revolution would never happen, and that illegitimacy would never become a major problem. Peter Sprigg of Family Research Council pointed out a few years ago that Conservatives were asleep at the switch. They failed to take the feminist revolution seriously, despite the clear fact that its thinking and methodology was deeply rooted in Hitlerian Marxism, the Frankfurt School, and the Women’s Ku Klux Klan.
Analysts still fail to recognize that the large increases Los Angeles crime and violence that began in the 1970’s were caused by maturing young men raised in fatherless families in the 1960’s. Former LAPD Chief Daryl Gates could not explain it. This problem rippled across America: Chicago, New York, just about every other city have crime rates considered unbelievable before 1960. The only thing we have to show for are is the highest incarceration rates in the world.
Millions of good men have been patriotically fighting irresponsible divorce since the late 1960’s. Some do it publicly – and many get arrested for it. The vast majority are quietly executed behind closed doors of courtrooms every day. Many good men live in great anger, angst and nightmare. Many formerly-good men, particularly poor or underemployed men, turn to crime to earn the incomes government demands of them. Many leave the country, never to return.
Others kill themselves or others. How many news stories of good men with no criminal history going insane will it take before we change America?
We now have even more evidence that McCain/Palin is just as bad for America as Obama/Biden. Shelly Mandell, president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women endorsed Palin before an audience of 20,000 at a tennis stadium in Carson California.
“A woman who will fight for women’s rights, a woman who will fight for the middle class, a woman who will – Lord knows – shake things up. I know Sarah Palin cares about women’s rights . As vice president, she will fight for you … She cares about our children and she cares about women’s lives. She’s an athlete, and knows what Title IX did for girls like her … I know that Sarah Palin is a reformer that will break up the old boy network (oh yea!) … This Is What A Feminist Looks Like’ “. [see video]
Palin later responded with “There’s a place in hell reserved for women who don’t support other women.â€ÂÂ
With endorsements like this, and Palin having become the latest fierce feminist in our faces, we can expect an endorsement from Nancy Pelosi any moment. Barney Frank should be hosting a wild costume fundraising luau for Mrs. “six-pack†in Hawaii no later than this weekend.
Mark my words: when the majority of young men grow up knowing they will be nothing more than slaves to the child support system, and have no constitutional rights to life, liberty, or the actual pursuit of happiness, America will become a very dangerous and uncivilized country. Abraham Lincoln ended slavery once. We now must end it a second time.
In her new book “The Shock Doctrineâ€ÂÂ, Naomi Klein points out how government and media create and magnify crises to gargantuan proportions knowing that the public will stand aside and trust their leaders “no matter what†to clean up the mess. Both Republicans and Democrats have regularly applied this effect to place tremendous sums of public monies in private hands. With the 700-billion bailout, they succeeded in forcing tremendous sums of private debt on the backs of each and every American. These are the same political solutions used to export the divorce revolution on the backs of good men, very few of whom deserved or wanted the divorces forced on them.
About fifteen years ago, I was taken aback by a framed plaque hanging on the wall of a conservative Republican Missouri state legislator I was working with on some legislation. It said, “The best way to resolve a problem is to export itâ€ÂÂ. Well, we have exported the problem to ourselves. Now, it is a much bigger one – big enough that California now requires a bailout and New York is queuing up for one too. Running these things through the pig again will avail nothing but compounded fetid results.
The 2008 elections are a sham of shills bought and paid for by the bloated federal beast and the tremendous array of companies and industries now living on the “privatized†dole.
I have been aware for nearly two years that big government would win in 2008 and the voters would lose. We actually have nothing in 2008 truly worth voting for. In the end, and no matter what we do, the winners will be sotted salespeople of sodden swampland inside the Beltway.
The numbers dictate that a day of economic reckoning will inevitably arrive — when the only option is to actually change Washington. When this unavoidable reality arrives, America will adopt and execute “Responsible Marriage†policies as the preferred and stimulated norm and restore real ethics and tough punitive measures to the legal, psychological, educational, and financial professions.
————————————————-
David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network, and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition
