<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death to &#8220;Gun Nuts&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/10/23/death-to-gun-nuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/10/23/death-to-gun-nuts/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:36:56 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stevens</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/10/23/death-to-gun-nuts/comment-page-1/#comment-67154</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=82568#comment-67154</guid>
		<description>To all the gun grabbers, eggheaded liberals, and other pinko communist types,  can you say &quot;second amendment&quot; and if you can, do you know why our founding fathers thought that was important enough to put in the constitution.  Even an idiot, who will stop and read the constitution and takes the time to read history knows why we have a second amendment. It&#039;s pretty clear, the force of law is sometimes not enough to stop tyrants and God knows we have plenty of them in our government today.  The founding fathers were afraid and with good cause, I might add, that an out of control government, might one day want to take away guns, you see gun ownership is the hallmark of liberty.  ( hint read history, every evil tyrannical dictator in history has always went after the guns.)
So to keep freedom and live securely, we need guns, because there are people out there who will not stop, they have to be stopped.  Whether that is some criminal on the street or a government thug, who doesn&#039;t even know his is a criminal. They have to be stopped, they have no respect for your life or the lives and property of others.
As far as this crime thing is concerned, the constitution also has something to say about that.  We need to get rid of a whole bunch of &quot;make believe laws&quot; ie no victim,the state looses money and concentrate on real crimes,  someone is hurt or killed, someones property is stolen, property they worked hard to get.  When we have a real crime, come down hard on it, and  do away with the money making racket the legal system has become.  Real crimes get real punishment, don&#039;t even worry about all this &quot;make believe stuff&quot; some greedy powermad government tyrant makes up.  Soon, if that is done, you won&#039;t even hear about it anymore.  We will put the fear of God in criminals and shut the gun grabbers up once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all the gun grabbers, eggheaded liberals, and other pinko communist types,  can you say &#8220;second amendment&#8221; and if you can, do you know why our founding fathers thought that was important enough to put in the constitution.  Even an idiot, who will stop and read the constitution and takes the time to read history knows why we have a second amendment. It&#8217;s pretty clear, the force of law is sometimes not enough to stop tyrants and God knows we have plenty of them in our government today.  The founding fathers were afraid and with good cause, I might add, that an out of control government, might one day want to take away guns, you see gun ownership is the hallmark of liberty.  ( hint read history, every evil tyrannical dictator in history has always went after the guns.)<br />
So to keep freedom and live securely, we need guns, because there are people out there who will not stop, they have to be stopped.  Whether that is some criminal on the street or a government thug, who doesn&#8217;t even know his is a criminal. They have to be stopped, they have no respect for your life or the lives and property of others.<br />
As far as this crime thing is concerned, the constitution also has something to say about that.  We need to get rid of a whole bunch of &#8220;make believe laws&#8221; ie no victim,the state looses money and concentrate on real crimes,  someone is hurt or killed, someones property is stolen, property they worked hard to get.  When we have a real crime, come down hard on it, and  do away with the money making racket the legal system has become.  Real crimes get real punishment, don&#8217;t even worry about all this &#8220;make believe stuff&#8221; some greedy powermad government tyrant makes up.  Soon, if that is done, you won&#8217;t even hear about it anymore.  We will put the fear of God in criminals and shut the gun grabbers up once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merck</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/10/23/death-to-gun-nuts/comment-page-1/#comment-67125</link>
		<dc:creator>merck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=82568#comment-67125</guid>
		<description>You donâ€™t have to be a â€œgun nutâ€ or a â€œmarkspersonâ€ to support and defend the Constitution. 

All you have to be is a *law abiding* citizen. 

People who advocate retracting the second amendment should be charged with obstructing justice.

If theyâ€™re elected public servants, sworn to uphold the Constitution, they should be charged with treason.

Itâ€™s time to â€œget toughâ€ with these criminals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You donâ€™t have to be a â€œgun nutâ€ or a â€œmarkspersonâ€ to support and defend the Constitution. </p>
<p>All you have to be is a *law abiding* citizen. </p>
<p>People who advocate retracting the second amendment should be charged with obstructing justice.</p>
<p>If theyâ€™re elected public servants, sworn to uphold the Constitution, they should be charged with treason.</p>
<p>Itâ€™s time to â€œget toughâ€ with these criminals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ouderkirk</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/10/23/death-to-gun-nuts/comment-page-1/#comment-67107</link>
		<dc:creator>Ouderkirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=82568#comment-67107</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I am a gun nut, and damned proud of it. I am availing myself of my Right under the Second Amendment.

I am a gun enthusiast/aficionado.

Being a marksman is a skill. One is not a marksman by virtue of owning a gun.

However I think that the best term is  &quot;defender of the second amendment&quot;. How about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I am a gun nut, and damned proud of it. I am availing myself of my Right under the Second Amendment.</p>
<p>I am a gun enthusiast/aficionado.</p>
<p>Being a marksman is a skill. One is not a marksman by virtue of owning a gun.</p>
<p>However I think that the best term is  &#8220;defender of the second amendment&#8221;. How about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
