Apple Funds End-stage Radical Feminist Inequality by Promoting Gay Marriage, Opposing Proposition 8
Apple Computer’s customer base will apparently be shrinking to about two percent of the population very quickly.
Apple just announced dedicated support for same-sex marriage, and a donation of $100,000 to kill Proposition 8 in California:
“No on Prop 8
October 24, 2008
Apple is publicly opposing Proposition 8 and making a donation of $100,000 to the No on 8 campaign. Apple was among the first California companies to offer equal rights and benefits to our employees’ same-sex partners, and we strongly believe that a person’s fundamental rights — including the right to marry — should not be affected by their sexual orientation. Apple views this as a civil rights issue, rather than just a political issue, and is therefore speaking out publicly against Proposition 8.†[i]
Gay marriage (actually “same-sex†marriage as the courts in three states have ordered) is not about equality. Civil rights do not rise from human behavior, especially behaviors known to kill people in large numbers and impose tremendous medical costs on society.
I don’t care what people do in their bedrooms. That is their business and their problem. But when they claim this somehow imbues a right to marry, we all become very interested.
Now, absorb the following legal tenet I realized in 2002 a few times until the full scope of the meaning sinks in.
Heterosexual marriage is the only legal institution that absolutely erases all physical, reproductive, economic, social, and culturally-imposed differences that exist between men and women. Same-sex marriage magnifies all disparities to maximal proportion, and essentially leaves men with substantively diminished or non-existent social, parental economic, voting, and legal rights in a society founded on predatory feminist socioeconomic chivalry.
The National Organization for Women has litigated heavily for same-sex marriage since the mid-80s. They desperately want it because they know damned well that when any two women can marry each other, feminist supremacy over family, children, and men’s incomes is assured; women having all the rights and no responsibilities to men, with women liberated absolutely from men.
Same-sex marriage (SSM) is an unconstitutional, dangerous hyper-Marxist extension of Roe v. Wade. Roe granted women absolute rights to their bodies, extending to the point of killing live babies. SSM extends this absolute right to fully subrogate the institution of heterosexual marriage to the heavy hand of predatory feminist choices.
Feminists intend to empower women to take over the institution of marriage, have as many lover children and sexual enounters as they want with whatever hot studs suits their fancy, collect child support and various welfare entitlements every step of the way.
When women learn they can marry their college roommate, keep their two incomes entirely, and get as many hefty child support orders, and welfare and S-Chip health care entitlements besides, there is no question this will happen in large numbers. Why would any woman marry a man, and have only two income sources and taxes, when she could marry another woman and have at least six sources of income, at least four of them being tax-free?
An average middle-class child support order is not a small sum. It amounts to an working income of at least $6.25 per hour salary for doing nothing but being a “custodial parentâ€. For four children this amounts to a tax-free working income of $24 per hour minimum.
Guess who pays this? Men who have no choice, except perhaps to marry other men for lack of marriage prospects; men who have no rights imbued under heterosexual marrage, but are mandated to assume most of the economic responsibilities.
This is why I call same-sex marriage the “penultimate system of predatory feminist chivalryâ€.
If San Francisco is shallow enough to decriminalize prostitution, prostitutes will simply marry each other and set out destroying men in every direction. Many women will take up prostitution for the additional benefits imbued: Very high incomes for short working hours. Married prostitute couples could easily make a minimum of $250,000 per year, plus at least $25,000 per year in child support, and retire into glam spinsterhood by age 35. With prospects like this, who needs to work, attend college, or make something of oneself?
Of course, married men will lose careers, jobs, and be ousted from politics when discovered fooling around with married prostitutes (whose marital fidelity will never be questioned). Where prostitution is considered a woman’s right, and a man’s wrong, there is no question who will dominate politics and policy in San Francisco.
Women cannot afford failure of Proposition 8. Any society comprised of large numbers of detached men, with no stake or rights in society, is guaranteed to be dangerous, nonproductive, and deficit-prone. Ask anybody trying to survive life in Oakland.
Now imagine expanding this to encompass the entire state of California.
Heterosexual marriage must be protected by Proposition 8. Advancement of the human race depends decisively on cooperation and equal legal, social, and parental rights for men and women. Heterosexual marriage is the only institution insuring this equality and a stable society for raising children into adulthood.
Vote “Yes†on Proposition 8!. In addition, drag out your old Smith Corona typewriter or hook up string between two bean cans before considering buying an Apple product.
————————————————-
David R. Usher is President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition
[i] http://www.apple.com/hotnews/
Possibly related posts...
| More from David R. Usher
Stumble It!
These greedy corporate types are always supporing some left wing liberal, anti man, anti God and anti morallity stance. It is going to take everyone boycotting them to get the message across. The only reason they support such immoral and irresponsible things, is that because the deviant groups who support them buy lots of their products. Well they, the corporations, need to know the ordinary good people, ie the legally, morally and socially responsible, have the weirdo’s, the kooks and morally repugnant outnumbered 1000 to 1 If we do business elsewhere they will be out of business and that folks, will get the message across.
That is also the tactic the fathers/mens right movement needs to use. Bring massive political, legal and economic pressure to bear on the tyrants who run the governnment sponsored kidnapping and extortion racket I mean the family law/court system. It’s all about money, right and wrong don’t mean thing to these people, cut off the money and they will stop.
This is a joke I have told a few times – They claim that the homosexual population is around four to ten percent of the population. Apple has around four to ten percent of the computer market. Coincidence?
Okay, it’s not very funny. And boy did it get me some nasty comebacks from the Apple faithful. Wonder what they’ll say now?
I have not seen any lists of male-friendly businesses. Somebody should do one.
I have an HP laptop, very happy with it.
I had my eye on some ‘apple’ products as I am in the market for a new computer. I’ll get an HP.
Also, Macy’s got their credit card returned to them cut to shreds and I will not use Verizon.
Is there any site listing male-freindly businesses?