On Palin and the Truth about Women’s Income

2008-10-26
By

Governor Palin’s recent campaign trail comments, regarding equal pay for women, appear to pander to gender feminist interests. Her comments appear misleading at best and quite possibly disingenuous.

Palin, at the very least, appeared intent on parroting Marxist, gender feminist rhetoric, when she said:

“Are you willing to break the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America?”

and:

“When the time came to make a decision, Barack Obama couldn’t bring himself to pick the woman who got eighteen million votes in the primary,” Palin said of Obama’s vice presidential pick, comparing it to the discrimination women face in the workplace every day. “The qualifications are there, but for some reason the promotion never comes … You’ve got to ask yourself, why wasn’t Senator Hillary Clinton even vetted by the Obama campaign?”

and:

“There is a difference between what Barack Obama says and what he does,” she declared. “Out on the stump, he talks about things like equal pay for equal work, but according to Senate records, women on his staff get just 83 cents for every dollar that the men get. What is with that? Does he think that the women aren’t working as hard? Does he think they’re 17 percent less productive?

Gender discrimination in pay for performance of equal work, has been illegal since the passage of the Civil Rights Act (1964). Today in America, gender discrimination in pay for performance of equal work is virtually non-existent. If it weren’t, don’t you think we’d be seeing it plastered all over daily news broadcasts?

Here is a brief excerpt from the Civil Rights Act (1964):

DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN

SEC. 703. (a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer–

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

(b) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

With the obvious appearance of gender feminists lurking so near Palin’s candidacy, Stalinist feminism seems to be alive and well in the “anti-evil-empire” party of Ronald Reagan. It’s pretty sad when we see a Republican platform cozy up to lies about the unfairness of women (as a group) taking home less money than men, with no mention of the fact that they (as a group) are not performing the same work as men, or even comparable work.

The commies, socialists, gender feminists and Democrats like to say women (as a group) perform a lot of work that is comparable to work men do, but they are lying, lying, lying, lying. Sitting at a desk typing is not comparable to doing heavy pipe fitting work. If Gov. If Palin is so familiar with the oil industry in her state, that pumps so much oil through pipes to the “lower 48,” she should know that.

Women (as a group) take home less because they work less, and/or don’t work as hard, and/or don’t work as long, and/or don’t have the same years experience as men, etc. Women (as a group) take home less because they don’t perform the work necessary to earn more. This has all been clearly documented in a book by Dr. Warren Farrell, entitled, “Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gap — and What Women Can Do About It,” This has also been extensively documented by the Independent Women’s Forum in numerous papers that have been published on their site and by affiliates of the IWF who have authored books, “Women’s Figures: An Illustrated Guide to the Economic Progress of Women in America,” by Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Christine Stolba and “The Feminist Dilemma: When Success Is Not Enough,” by Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Christine Stolba. Nancy Pfotenhauer, former President of the IWF, is now a top adviser in the McCain/Palin campaign so I am left to wonder, “Where’s the disconnect between Palin’s speech and the wage-gap-myth facts?”

All that being said, there are plenty of women who make the same as a man would make doing the same job, because they “earn” it. Take Gov. Palin for example, Gov. of Alaska. She is getting the very same money a man would get in that job and many have said she’s doing a better job than her male predecessors. She’s apparently “earning” her pay. I would suggest that the rest of the whining female gender, complaining about unequal pay, stop whining and lying and do the same. How about starting with jobs like plumber, roofer, concrete worker, etc.? Those are jobs where women typically haven’t performed as well as men. And while we’re at it, how about front line, ground combat (grunt) duty, that President Bush has made women exempt from? Why don’t all women who demand the same pay men earn, actually exhibit all the same job performance, then get the same money and shut the hell up?

As a man I am reconsidering my vote for the McCain/Palin ticket in light of Governor Palin’s less than fully truthful comments about the money American men and women earn in the workplace Unfortunately, my preference (my vote) for the Presidential ticket will have to be decided, based on which political party bashes men less.

Curiously, Palin, and all other 2008 candidates for elected office, have failed to mention the “gender-spending-gap,” wherein women:

  • # control 88 percent of all purchases,
  • # handle 75 percent of family finances,
  • # comprise 43 percent of those with assets over $500,000,
  • # influence two out of every three of the 3 trillion dollars spent in the U.S. each year!

“Pocketbook Power: How to Reach the Hearts and Minds of Today’s Most Coveted Consumer – Women,” by Bernice Kanner

If women are so unequally and unfairly paid in the workplace, one is left to ponder at length, “Where, oh where, and how, do women earn all the money they spend?”

528 views

  • Ray Blumhorst

    All this, without even mentioning Palin’s one sided comments, praising misandrist Title IX. Where’s Palin’s famous opposition to corrupt embedded interests, in this case gender feminism?

    It appears when it comes to pandering to Hillary voters (gender feminists), she’s no maverick at all, just a yapping lap dog, begging for treats (votes). So how is Governor Palin different from Hillary Clinton?

    Why does Gov. Palin fail to mention the lack of application of Title IX in college and university enrollments, where men lag behind? Why does Palin fail to mention the lack of application of Title IX in college and university programs like women’s studies, English, Dance, etc.,etc., etc., where men lag behind?

  • Ray Blumhorst

    Apparently, Palin has her own views on “spreading the wealth around.”

    # Does Palin secretly embrace her own interpretation of the Marxist model? “From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need.” – Karl Marx

    The Marxist (gender feminist) model is quite different from the traditional American model, where many who are willing to work hard can get ahead.

    http://tinyurl.com/69whlo

    Are Presidental election voters now limited in their choice to Marxists, or Marxist toadies?

  • Denis

    Ray-

    well done. I agree with you.

    Hillary Clinton was recently asked by a reporter about her thoughts concerning Palin’s $150K wardrobe for the campaign. Hillary’s response was that this was yet another example of sexim towards women-e.g., nobody would asked this about a male candidate. The irony here is that it is the left that brought this topic up-not the supposedly sexist right. And one could argue that the attempt was more to paint Palin as a hypocrite wearing designer clothes instead of the Wal-Mart hockey mom she tries to sell herself as. But no, it’s yet another example of the downtrodden American women bravely fighting the forces of evil male patriarchal oppression.

    I bring this up because for women it does not matter from what side of the political spectrum they are on-both women on the right and left see women as historical victim’s of oppression by men. The truth is, that no matter how bad women had it throughout history, it is the majority of men who always had been worse off. But you will never hear this fact. Instead:

    The Big Feminist Lie has won over the mass of women (and men) because for 4 decades men never once stood up to defend their gender from these grossly unfair accusations. Hence, The Lies are now unquestioned truths.

    Whoever becomes President will ensure that men and fathers are worse off 4 or 8 years later-worse off in the new laws that will get passed-worse off in the courts-worse off in the schools and universities-worse off in the work place.

    American women are solidly secure in their status as royalty.

    Things are only going to get worse for the men.

    Much worse.

  • merck

    This is the way I see it.

    # Control 88 percent of all purchases … because men choose to let the women in their lives do the shopping.

    # Handle 75 percent of family finances … because men choose to let women handle the family finances.

    # influence two out of every three of the 3 trillion dollars spent in the U.S. each year! … Because women are a lot more involved in the political process than men are.

    Who’s to blame for that?

    I agree; women should be kicking in doors on front line combat positions and chivalrous men are the reason they’re not.

    Take responsibility guys, it’s the only way things will ever change.

  • amfortas

    Many (most?)women just cannot help themselves. They mouth the feminist clap-trap automatically. Mrs Palin or Clinton could be Empress of the World and still complain about a glass ceiling. They would pay their cleaning lady less per hout than their auto-mechanic and still complain that women get paid less and its YOUR fault. They can make a ‘choices’ not to join up and fight for their country but still demand equal rights – and that women need more choices. Brain in Neutral – mouth in Overdrive.

  • MartianBachelor

    I don’t take Palin’s use of feminist catchphrases on the campaign trail too literally, or too seriously. I just take it as a way of her trying to defuse the portrayals of her as being extreme religious fundamentalist right-wing (etc.), for the benefit of more moderate and independent voters.

    Everyone knows the caricature is that far right Republicans are backward, racist misogynists who are against abortion because they want women barefoot, pregnant, and stuck at home in the kitchen under the iron boot of the patriarchy (or something like that). By co-opting some of the language of egalitarian feminism she emphasizes her own biography and record of accomplishment, and makes the caricature look both silly, mean-spirited, and wrong.

    Lots of people who maybe don’t think about these things as much or is as much depth as some of us do somewhat buy into the feminist mantra that politics needs the active participation of women (simply because they’re women), and I think she’s just trying to capitalize on that sentiment in a way which isn’t very controversial so far as most are concerned.

  • http://www.singleparents.org.nz julie

    Off topic. Here is an interesting site.

    http://www.maplight.org/about

    MAPLight.org, a groundbreaking public database, illuminates the connection between campaign donations and legislative votes in unprecedented ways. Elected officials collect large sums of money to run their campaigns, and they often pay back campaign contributors with special access and favorable laws.
    This common practice is contrary to the public interest, yet legal. MAPLight.org makes money/vote connections transparent, to help citizens hold their legislators accountable.

    It tells you the groups that are paying for laws and how much they are giving to the legislators personally to pass them or hold them back.

    For instance. H.R.1338 – Paycheck Fairness Act had feminist interest groups and human rights groups.

    *
    $70,858 to each legislator voting Yes
    60.3326140314%
    *
    $2,561 to each legislator voting No
    2.180654631%

    http://tinyurl.com/5qxght

    Other laws also. Including finances from banks.

    California Senate votes and contributions:

    Senator Feinstein voted Yes on bailout bill. She received $460,236 from banks and securities firms from Jan 2001 through Aug 2008.

    Senator Boxer voted Yes on bailout bill. She received $1,064,914 from banks and securities firms from Jan 2001 through Aug 2008.

  • The Brit

    A couple of pertinent articles on discrimination on EQSQ.com:

    Gender Discrimination in the Workplace: It’s Not What you Think
    http://www.eqsq.com/weekly-whims/2006/11/09/gender-discrimination-in-the-workplace-its-not-what-you-think/

    Are Men More Equal than Women? The Truth about the Earnings Gap.

    http://www.eqsq.com/weekly-whims/2006/06/29/are-men-more-equal-than-women-the-truth-about-the-earnings-gap/






Search