lumigan tramadol tadalafil

McCain: Why We Must Elect a Non-Lawyer

2008-11-01
By

The State of Florida has a very interesting Constitutional provision, one that should be expanded to include the federal level: Lawyers are not permitted to run for non-judicial offices.

The Separation of Powers Doctrine forms a delicate balance. The Judicial, Executive, and Administrative branches should operate independently of each other, with nothing invisibly orchestrating the three.

To the extent that lawyers have invaded the Administrative and Executive branches, often terrorizing non-lawyers by abusing their law degrees and threatening to sue people they do not like, America has become a legal dictatorship operated by the American Bar Association (which happens to be headquartered on Chicago’s Michigan Boulevard, in Barack Obama’s back yard).

This does not suggest that lawyers are bad people. It reflects the truth that when any trade association can arbitrarily control nations or the world, the outcome will necessarily become evil and perverse, as predicted in Scott Peck’s book “People Of the Lie”. [i]

The American Bar Association and the various state Bar Associations have demonstrated vast hegemony controlling all state institutions, often overtly applying outrageous unconstitutional standards of practice and opinions about how America will be run.

Take for example the Violence Against Women Act, which happens to be Joe Biden’s favorite hobby that is sponsored by Barack Obama’s biggest political supporters – feminists.

Many billions have been spent in the name of “ending violence against women”. But domestic violence has not abated. Why? Because VAWA funds feminists to destroy marriage according to the feminist dictates of the 1970’s, and little of the money is used to help women living in violence. Secondly, VAWA does not permit one nickel to be spent where women are the violent partner, which statistically is half of all cases.

The ABA expressly endorses VAWA, despite the fact that the official ABA Standards of Practice document expressly and unconstitutionally predeclares the petitioner as female and the defendant as male. [ii] VAWA is nothing less than “Uncle Tom” with a feminist law license.

In support of radical destruction of marriage by socialist-feminists, at tremendous profit to trial lawyers, A.B.A. President William H. Neukom urges more funding for VAWA legal services! [iii]

The Bar is the only trade association in America permitted to discipline itself exclusively. It controls the majority of activities of both federal and state Legislative, Administrative, and Judicial branches from one office building in Chicago, Illinois.

Barack Obama, a slick Harvard lawyer, has expressly declared his intent to eviscerate the Constitution and courts to become handmaidens for mob rule founded on gross personal irresponsibility:

Speaking in July 2007 at a conference of Planned Parenthood, he [Obama] said: “[W]e need somebody who’s got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it’s like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And that’s the criteria by which I’m going to be selecting my judges.”

On this view, plaintiffs should usually win against defendants in civil cases; criminals in cases against the police; consumers, employees and stockholders in suits brought against corporations; and citizens in suits brought against the government. Empathy, not justice, ought to be the mission of the federal courts, and the redistribution of wealth should be their mantra ….

He also noted that the Court “didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it has been interpreted.” That is to say, he noted that the U.S. Constitution as written is only a guarantee of negative liberties from government — and not an entitlement to a right to welfare or economic justice.[iv]

Bob Bertrand, a gentleman who works with http://judicialaccountability.org, attended a McCain book-signing event at a book store in Florida not long ago. Bertrand was handing out bumper stickers saying “Don’t Vote For Lawyers”. McCain asked the book store manger to let Bertrand hand them out inside the store, and even invited Bertrand to meet with him privately later. McCain thanked Bertrand for his work.

In addition to being a power-lawyer who openly practices the murder of free speech via scurrilous tort suits and community-organized prosecutorial assaults, Obama runs closely with Marxist-feminists. Marxist-feminists are the primary historical source of all anti-marriage and anti-religious policies, such as abortion, no-fault divorce, illegitimacy entitlements, legalized suicide, sexual liberation, gay rights, and gay marriage.

Let us not elevate a power-hungry male Marxist-feminist to the Presidency on Tuesday.

While McCain is not the ideal candidate we were looking for, he is not a lawyer or a card-carrying feminist. McCain will not send America into Constitutional anarchy driven by ACORN and its radical sister organizations who believe that that Saul Alinksy is God.

American feminist-socialists are presently drooling at the prospect of enacting the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which will permit them to dictate American policy from law offices overseas. We must not turn the Constitution over to A.B.A. globalist legal dictators.

On Tuesday, let us vote for John McCain, the only candidate who will prevent the American Bar Association from turning America over to globalist Star-Chamber lawyers in Geneva and Brussels.

————————————————-

David R. Usher is President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition


[i] http://www.amazon.com/People-Lie-Hope-Healing-Human/dp/0684848597

[ii] http://www.abanet.org/domviol/docs/StandardsCommentary.pdf

[iii] http://www.abanet.org/abanet/media/statement/statement.cfm?releaseid=353

[iv] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122515067227674187.html

1 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • merck

    Election Unconstitutional? Any thoughts on this?

    http://unitedcivilrights.org/saveamericanow.html

    The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate.

    The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted.

    The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.[1]

    The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.[2]

  • http://www.decriminalizefatherhood.com DcFather

    Excellent piece, David. “Don’t vote for a lawyer” is sound-bite-ish enough for contemporary attention spans.

    We are now a nation of the lawyers, by the lawyers, and for the lawyers.

    If only we had a media willing to serve its most fundamental purpose and repeatedly point that out to the masses, instead of having sold their souls to the extreme left, there would still be hope for America as a free republic.

    Meanwhile we’re on the verge of going over the cliff into the abysmal depths of Marxist-feminist rule by judicial fiat.

  • merck

    “In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a Congress”

    -John Adams

    _______________________________________________________

    Lawyers are among the most disliked and distrusted people on the face of this earth, and always have been, for one reason, and one reason only, they’ve earned it.

    The stated mission of the American Bar Association, which was founded in 1878, is, “to be the national representative of the legal profession, serving the public and the profession by promoting justice, professional excellence and respect for the law.”

    I think most people would agree that they’ve failed miserably at their stated objective.

    As an aside, when the San Francisco earthquake and fire happened back in 1906, the craftsmen who were brought in to rebuild the city were paid about $4.00 a day on average. A New York City lawyer in 1906 made about $2.50 a day on average.

    What the hell happened to America?







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search